| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Pass 'ublk_thread *' to more common helpers, then we can avoid to store
this reference into 'struct ublk_io'.
Prepare for supporting to handle IO via different task context.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250713143415.2857561-14-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
'struct thread' is task local structure, and the related code will become
more readable if we pass it via parameter.
Meantime pass 'ublk_thread *' to ublk_io_alloc_sqes(), and this way is
natural since we use per-thread io_uring for handling IO.
More importantly it helps much for removing the current ubq_daemon or
per-io-task limit.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250713143415.2857561-13-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
The `tag` parameter can be figured out from cqe->user_data, and that is
also the only way to get the info, so remove `tag` parameter, and
let target code retrieve it from cqe->user_data.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250713143415.2857561-12-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
We currently have a helper ublk_queue_alloc_sqes which the ublk targets
use to allocate SQEs for their own operations. However, as we move
towards decoupled ublk_queues and ublk server threads, this helper does
not make sense anymore. SQEs are allocated from rings, and we will have
one ring per thread to avoid locking. Change the SQE allocation helper
to ublk_io_alloc_sqes. Currently this still allocates SQEs from the io's
queue's ring, but when we fully decouple threads and queues, it will
allocate from the io's thread's ring instead.
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250529-ublk_task_per_io-v8-3-e9d3b119336a@purestorage.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Currently, when we process CQEs, we know which ublk_queue we are working
on because we know which ring we are working on, and ublk_queues and
rings are in 1:1 correspondence. However, as we decouple ublk_queues
from ublk server threads, ublk_queues and rings will no longer be in 1:1
correspondence - each ublk server thread will have a ring, and each
thread may issue commands against more than one ublk_queue. So in order
to know which ublk_queue a CQE refers to, plumb that information in the
associated SQE's user_data.
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250529-ublk_task_per_io-v8-2-e9d3b119336a@purestorage.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Add test for covering UBLK_AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK:
- pass '--auto_zc_fallback' to null target, which requires both F_AUTO_BUF_REG
and F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY for handling UBLK_AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK
- add ->buf_index() method for returning invalid buffer index to trigger
UBLK_AUTO_BUF_REG_FALLBACK
- add generic_09 for running the test
- add --auto_zc_fallback test in stress_03/stress_04/stress_05
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250520045455.515691-7-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
|
Add one simple fault inject target, and verify if an application using ublk
device sees an I/O error quickly after the ublk server dies.
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416035444.99569-9-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
