| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add tests for PR_SYS_DISPATCH_INCLUSIVE_ON correct/incorrect args,
and a test that ensures that the specified range is respected
by both PR_SYS_DISPATCH_EXCLUSIVE_ON and PR_SYS_DISPATCH_INCLUSIVE_ON.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8df4b50b176b073550bab5b3f3faff752c5f8e17.1747839857.git.dvyukov@google.com
|
|
Successful syscalls don't change errno, so checking errno is wrong
to ensure that a syscall has failed. For example for the following
sequence:
prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, op, 0x0, 0xff, 0);
EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, op, 0x0, 0x0, &sel);
EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
only the first syscall may fail and set errno, but the second may succeed
and keep errno intact, and the check will falsely pass.
Or if errno happened to be EINVAL before, even the first check may falsely
pass.
Also use EXPECT/ASSERT consistently. Currently there is an inconsistent mix
without obvious reasons for usage of one or another.
Fixes: 179ef035992e ("selftests: Add kselftest for syscall user dispatch")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/af6a04dbfef9af8570f5bab43e3ef1416b62699a.1747839857.git.dvyukov@google.com
|
|
Currently, the sud_test expects the emulated syscall to return the
emulated syscall number. This assumption only works on architectures
were the syscall calling convention use the same register for syscall
number/syscall return value. This is not the case for RISC-V and thus
the return value must be also emulated using the provided ucontext.
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206134438.473166-1-cleger@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Michael Kerrisk suggested that, from an API perspective, it is a bad
idea to share the PR_SYS_DISPATCH_ defines between the prctl operation
and the selector variable.
Therefore, define two new constants to be used by SUD's selector variable
and update the corresponding documentation and test cases.
While this changes the API syscall user dispatch has never been part of a
Linux release, it will show up for the first time in 5.11.
Suggested-by: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210205184321.2062251-1-krisman@collabora.com
|
|
Implement functionality tests for syscall user dispatch. In order to
make the test portable, refrain from open coding syscall dispatchers and
calculating glibc memory ranges.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201127193238.821364-6-krisman@collabora.com
|
