summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_spin_lock_fail.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-03-15selftests/bpf: Test sleepable global subprogs in atomic contextsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Add tests for rejecting sleepable and accepting non-sleepable global function calls in atomic contexts. For spin locks, we still reject all global function calls. Once resilient spin locks land, we will carefully lift in cases where we deem it safe. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250301151846.1552362-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-23selftests/bpf: fix test_spin_lock_fail.c's global vars usageAndrii Nakryiko
Global variables of special types (like `struct bpf_spin_lock`) make underlying ARRAY maps non-mmapable. To make this work with libbpf's mmaping logic, application is expected to declare such special variables as static, so libbpf doesn't even attempt to mmap() such ARRAYs. test_spin_lock_fail.c didn't follow this rule, but given it relied on this test to trigger failures, this went unnoticed, as we never got to the step of mmap()'ing these ARRAY maps. It is fragile and relies on specific sequence of libbpf steps, which are an internal implementation details. Fix the test by marking lockA and lockB as static. Fixes: c48748aea4f8 ("selftests/bpf: Add failure test cases for spin lock pairing") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023043908.3834423-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Add test for static subprog call in lock csKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Add selftests for static subprog calls within bpf_spin_lock critical section, and ensure we still reject global subprog calls. Also test the case where a subprog call will unlock the caller's held lock, or the caller will unlock a lock taken by a subprog call, ensuring correct transfer of lock state across frames on exit. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240204222349.938118-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-11-17selftests/bpf: Add failure test cases for spin lock pairingKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
First, ensure that whenever a bpf_spin_lock is present in an allocation, the reg->id is preserved. This won't be true for global variables however, since they have a single map value per map, hence the verifier harcodes it to 0 (so that multiple pseudo ldimm64 insns can yield the same lock object per map at a given offset). Next, add test cases for all possible combinations (kptr, global, map value, inner map value). Since we lifted restriction on locking in inner maps, also add test cases for them. Currently, each lookup into an inner map gets a fresh reg->id, so even if the reg->map_ptr is same, they will be treated as separate allocations and the incorrect unlock pairing will be rejected. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221118015614.2013203-22-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>