| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
With the latest llvm21 compiler, I hit several errors when building bpf
selftests. Some of errors look like below:
test_maps.c:565:40: error: variable 'val' is uninitialized when passed as a
const pointer argument here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized-const-pointer]
565 | assert(bpf_map_update_elem(fd, NULL, &val, 0) < 0 &&
| ^~~
prog_tests/bpf_iter.c:400:25: error: variable 'c' is uninitialized when passed
as a const pointer argument here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized-const-pointer]
400 | write(finish_pipe[1], &c, 1);
| ^
Some other errors have similar the pattern as the above.
These errors are fixed by initializing those variables properly.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250715185910.3659447-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic
Pull asm-generic fixes from Arnd Bergmann:
"These are three important bug fixes for the cross-architecture tree,
fixing a regression with the new syscall.tbl file, the inconsistent
numbering for the new uretprobe syscall and a bug with iowrite64be on
alpha"
* tag 'asm-generic-fixes-6.11-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic:
syscalls: fix syscall macros for newfstat/newfstatat
uretprobe: change syscall number, again
alpha: fix ioread64be()/iowrite64be() helpers
|
|
Despite multiple attempts to get the syscall number assignment right
for the newly added uretprobe syscall, we ended up with a bit of a mess:
- The number is defined as 467 based on the assumption that the
xattrat family of syscalls would use 463 through 466, but those
did not make it into 6.11.
- The include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h file still lists the number
463, but the new scripts/syscall.tbl that was supposed to have the
same data lists 467 instead as the number for arc, arm64, csky,
hexagon, loongarch, nios2, openrisc and riscv. None of these
architectures actually provide a uretprobe syscall.
- All the other architectures (powerpc, arm, mips, ...) don't list
this syscall at all.
There are two ways to make it consistent again: either list it with
the same syscall number on all architectures, or only list it on x86
but not in scripts/syscall.tbl and asm-generic/unistd.h.
Based on the most recent discussion, it seems like we won't need it
anywhere else, so just remove the inconsistent assignment and instead
move the x86 number to the next available one in the architecture
specific range, which is 335.
Fixes: 5c28424e9a34 ("syscalls: Fix to add sys_uretprobe to syscall.tbl")
Fixes: 190fec72df4a ("uprobe: Wire up uretprobe system call")
Fixes: 63ded110979b ("uprobe: Change uretprobe syscall scope and number")
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Fixing ASSERT_OK condition check in uprobe_syscall test,
otherwise we return from test on pipe success.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240726180847.684584-1-jolsa@kernel.org
|
|
Fixing the syscall number value.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240712135228.1619332-3-jolsa@kernel.org/
Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding uretprobe shadow stack test that runs all existing
uretprobe tests with shadow stack enabled if it's available.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-9-jolsa@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding test to verify that when called from outside of the
trampoline provided by kernel, the uretprobe syscall will cause
calling process to receive SIGILL signal and the attached bpf
program is not executed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-8-jolsa@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Adding test that creates uprobe consumer on uretprobe which changes some
of the registers. Making sure the changed registers are propagated to the
user space when the ureptobe syscall trampoline is used on x86_64.
To be able to do this, adding support to bpf_testmod to create uprobe via
new attribute file:
/sys/kernel/bpf_testmod_uprobe
This file is expecting file offset and creates related uprobe on current
process exe file and removes existing uprobe if offset is 0. The can be
only single uprobe at any time.
The uprobe has specific consumer that changes registers used in ureprobe
syscall trampoline and which are later checked in the test.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-7-jolsa@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
|
Add uretprobe syscall test that compares register values before
and after the uretprobe is hit. It also compares the register
values seen from attached bpf program.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240611112158.40795-6-jolsa@kernel.org/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
|
