Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
JF device is frozen on API 77. This prevented us from bumping the
minimum FW API of SO (and get rid of older FWs). This is because SO can
be combined with JF and then FW API 77 should be used.
Now as we have separate FW API ranges for the mac and the crf, we can
define for JF its own FW API range. This will allow bumping the minimum
FW API of SO Independently.
Do that now.
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250709200543.1628666-3-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
|
|
This really only needs to be distinguished based on the
RF type, bandwidth limit and possibly diversity (JF1).
Some of the names that are defined don't even exist.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250510214621.bca83604aa92.I35301d2d8b57c072284fff7bf6682b4a9424e56c@changeid
|
|
With all the cleanups now, we can rename the structure to
better indicate the functionality. For older devices this
isn't quite accurate, of course, but it's better to have a
name that reflects future use for maintenance.
Add some kernel-doc while at it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250509104454.2582160-9-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
|
|
Unify the JF configs to just one JF RF config. This can be
done because the differing fields (thermal and DCCM offsets)
won't be used for Qu MACs (and up) due to firmware support.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250509104454.2582160-4-miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
|