| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
These macros had initially no frequency field. When I added the "maximum
operation frequency" field, I did it initially on very common macros and
I decided to add an optional field for that (with VA_ARGS) in order to
prevent massively unreadable changes. I then added new variants in the
spinand.h header, and requested a frequency field for them by
default. Some times later, I also added maximum frequencies to other
existing variants, but I did it incorrectly, without noticing I was
wrong because the field was optional.
This mix is error prone, so let's do what I should have done since the
very beginning: add a frequency field to all READ_FROM_CACHE variants.
There is no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the (quad) program load macro name.
While at modifying it, better add the missing_ OP suffix to align with
all the other macros of the same kind.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really means by describing the expected bus
topology in the (single) program load macro name.
While at modifying it, better add the missing_ OP suffix to align with
all the other macros of the same kind.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (quad IO) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (quad output) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (dual IO) read from cache macro names. While at
modifying them, better reordering the macros to group them all by bus
topology which now feels more intuitive.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (dual output) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
SPI operations have been initially described through macros implicitly
implying the use of a single SPI SDR bus. Macros for supporting dual and
quad I/O transfers have been added on top, generally inspired by vendor
naming, followed by DTR operations. Soon we might see octal
and even octal DTR operations as well (including the opcode byte).
Let's clarify what the macro really mean by describing the expected bus
topology in the (single) read from cache macro names.
Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
So far, the SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP macro was taking a first
argument, "fast", which was inducing the possibility to support higher
bus frequencies than with the normal (slower) read from cache
alternative. In practice, without frequency change on the bus, this was
likely without effect, besides perhaps allowing another variant of the
same command, that could run at the default highest speed. If we want to
support this fully, we need to add a frequency parameter to the slowest
command. But before we do that, let's drop the "fast" boolean from the
macro and duplicate it, this will further help supporting having
different frequencies allowed for each variant.
The change is also of course propagated to all users. It has the nice
effect to have all macros aligned on the same pattern.
Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
|
Currently there are 3 different variants of read_id implementation:
1. opcode only. Found in GD5FxGQ4xF.
2. opcode + 1 addr byte. Found in GD5GxGQ4xA/E
3. opcode + 1 dummy byte. Found in other currently supported chips.
Original implementation was for variant 1 and let detect function
of chips with variant 2 and 3 to ignore the first byte. This isn't
robust:
1. For chips of variant 2, if SPI master doesn't keep MOSI low
during read, chip will get a random id offset, and the entire id
buffer will shift by that offset, causing detect failure.
2. For chips of variant 1, if it happens to get a devid that equals
to manufacture id of variant 2 or 3 chips, it'll get incorrectly
detected.
This patch reworks detect procedure to address problems above. New
logic do detection for all variants separatedly, in 1-2-3 order.
Since all current detect methods do exactly the same id matching
procedure, unify them into core.c and remove detect method from
manufacture_ops.
Tested on GD5F1GQ4UAYIG and W25N01GVZEIG.
Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200208074439.146296-1-gch981213@gmail.com
|
|
Add initial support for Paragon Technology
PN26G01Axxxxx and PN26G02Axxxxx SPI NAND
Datasheets available at
http://www.xtxtech.com/upfile/2016082517274590.pdf
http://www.xtxtech.com/upfile/2016082517282329.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kletsky <git-commits@allycomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
|
