Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The driver specific HDCP GSC code will eventually be part of the driver
cores rather than display. Remove the struct intel_display references
from them, and pass struct drm_device instead.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bf9aa8e44e18eef41e3077a2966935b4e2649b62.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
The in/out buffers are just opaque data, and don't need to be considered
u8*. Switching to void* lets us drop a ton of unnecessary casts.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ea005adb713e85b797d83204c80de0a2a8e5ab47.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
The opaque HDCP GSC context nicely abstracts the differences between
drivers. Pass that instead of struct drm_i915_private or struct
xe_device to intel_hdcp_gsc_msg_send(). We can store the driver specific
data in the context.
This lets us drop the dependency on i915_drv.h from
intel_hdcp_gsc_message.c.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/df1653212f9014e717701b017e78e0017884b870.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Name the functions intel_hdcp_gsc_context_alloc() and
intel_hdcp_gsc_context_free() for consistency.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c6e25686ed20b5fdea9a59faf6a64a7312a075b0.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
It's really about the context more than about the message.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ca0a802a81ba4e96e7c40646a32386d4351d6ff4.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Allocate and initialize the HDCP GSC message in
intel_hdcp_gsc_hdcp2_init() as before, but store the pointer to
display->hdcp.hdcp_message in the caller. Similarly, pass in the pointer
to intel_hdcp_gsc_free_message().
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a74fcc941126bf92d12115b5faf4f75099e26242.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
The gsc_hdcp_ops is duplicated and initialized exactly the same way in
two different places (for i915 and xe), and requires forward
declarations for all the hooks. Deduplicate, and make the functions
static.
There are slight differences in the i915 and xe implementations of
intel_hdcp_gsc_init() and intel_hdcp_gsc_fini(). Take the best of both,
and improve.
We need to expose intel_hdcp_gsc_hdcp2_init() and
intel_hdcp_gsc_free_message() for this, and create the latter for xe.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/21e7871b35d4c7d13f016b5ecb4f10e5be72c531.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
intel_hdcp_gsc_msg_send() and intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status() are declared
in intel_hdcp_gsc.h.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f300d7cdb2af681291df938194f575f05c2c41bc.1745524803.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Use intel_display structure instead of drm_i915_private wherever
possible in hdcp_gsc related files.
--v2
-make intel_hdcp_gsc_hdcp2_init accept intel_display [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240911090540.643155-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
|
|
Use to_intel_display() instead of kdev_to_i915() in the HDCP component
API hooks. Avoid further drive-by changes at this point, and just
convert the display pointer to i915, and leave the struct intel_display
conversion for later.
The NULL error checking in the hooks make this a bit cumbersome. I'm not
actually sure they're really required, but don't go down that rabbit
hole just now.
Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/efd5c4c164c01b7ee50ad43f202b074b373fb810.1724942754.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Clean up the top level include/drm directory by grouping all the Intel
specific files under a common subdirectory.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/5f53384118e33123d3c87b94cc8835360237698b.1717075103.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Just use a simple {} to zero initialize arrays/structs instead
of the hodgepodge of stuff we are using currently.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231012122442.15718-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Create a new file intel_hdcp_gsc_message that contain functions
which fill the hdcp messages we send to gsc cs this refactor will
help us reuse code for Xe later on
--v2
-add the missed file for proper build
--v3
-use forward declarations instead of #includes [Jani]
--v4
-move linux/err.h to intel_hdcp_gsc_message.c from
intel_hdcp_gsc_message.h [Jani]
--v5
-move linux include on top of drm includes [Uma]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231009095537.653619-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
|