| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
All the users of intel_de_*() functions now pass in struct
intel_display, and we can remove the __to_intel_display() _Generic()
compat wrappers.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3aac42eab7b03c791afee940d0a647770afc99c5.1746175756.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
intel_de_wait_for_set(), intel_de_wait_for_clear(), intel_de_read_fw(),
and intel_de_write_fw() are only passed struct intel_display. Remove the
unnecessary compatibility wrappers.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/35589d84ee7996f8972ddb3ebc1aae1b53077b19.1742906146.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Add to_intel_uncore() function to avoid the inclusion of i915_drv.h from
intel_de.h. This reveals a number of implicit dependencies on i915_drv.h
that need to be added.
For now, to_intel_uncore() can be an inline function, with all the
includes in compat intel_uncore.h, as long as i915_drv.h isn't
included. The implicit dependencies on i915_drv.h is a problem in
display code, but the same is not true for xe_device.h etc.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/377e2b400d126776224fc49874ed9cb03ac3123c.1732104170.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
The i915_reg_rw tracing is a small isolated part of i915_trace.h. Its
users are orthogonal to the other i915_trace.h users as well, and its
implementation does not require all the includes of i915_trace.h. Split
i915_reg_rw tracing to separate intel_uncore_trace.[ch].
The main underlying goal is to reduce implicit includes of i915_drv.h
from display code.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1a3623fbb120adc55bc1cab1e27aca6e55487163.1732104170.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Some display MMIO transactions for offsets in the range that requires
the DMC wakelock happen in atomic context (this has been confirmed
during tests on PTL). That means that we need to use a non-sleeping
variant of MMIO waiting function.
Implement __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() and use it when
waiting for acknowledgment of acquire/release.
v2:
- No __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() wrapper to convert
i915 to display. (Jani)
- Add a quick explanation why DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US is defined
in microseconds. (Luca)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-4-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
With many of the intel_de_* callers switched over to struct
intel_display, we can remove some of the unnecessary generic wrappers.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/82da66027a122b336278daa2c9a9eb39843082ba.1730146000.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
We need to be able to do both MMIO and DSB based pipe/plane
programming. To that end plumb the 'dsb' all way from the top
into the plane commit hooks.
The compiler appears smart enough to combine the branches from
all the back-to-back register writes into a single branch.
So the generated asm ends up looking more or less like this:
plane_hook()
{
if (dsb) {
intel_dsb_reg_write();
intel_dsb_reg_write();
...
} else {
intel_de_write_fw();
intel_de_write_fw();
...
}
}
which seems like a reasonably efficient way to do this.
An alternative I was also considering is some kind of closure
(register write function + display vs. dsb pointer passed to it).
That does result is smaller code as there are no branches anymore,
but having each register access go via function pointer sounds
less efficient.
Not that I actually measured the overhead of either approach yet.
Also the reg_rw tracepoint seems to be making a huge mess of the
generated code for the mmio path. And additionally there's some
kind of IS_GSI_REG() hack in __raw_uncore_read() which ends up
generating a pointless branch for every mmio register access.
So looks like there might be quite a bit of room for improvement
in the mmio path still.
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240930170415.23841-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
|
It would be too much noise to convert the intel_de_* functions from
using struct drm_i915_private to struct intel_display all at once. Add
generic wrappers using __to_intel_display() to accept both.
v2: Take the intel_dmc_wl_* changes into account
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1b0e8e7c732535e18c8498a2e18fe1e4c123e2f5.1713358679.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Convert the dmc wakelock interface to struct intel_display instead of
struct drm_i915_private. We'll want to convert the intel_de interfaces,
and there's a bit of coupling between the two, so start here.
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3c260bbbce0af8714b07157dc032b038efa3bf1c.1713358679.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Rename __intel_wait_for_register_nowl() to
__intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() to be in line with the rest of
intel_de.h.
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/967d3fc67a9053f7d5f9c03010fd5f94dc8d547d.1713358679.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
In order to reduce the DC5->DC2 restore time, wakelocks have been
introduced in DMC so the driver can tell it when registers and other
memory areas are going to be accessed and keep their respective blocks
awake.
Implement this in the driver by adding the concept of DMC wakelocks.
When the driver needs to access memory which lies inside pre-defined
ranges, it will tell DMC to set the wakelock, access the memory, then
wait for a while and clear the wakelock.
The wakelock state is protected in the driver with spinlocks to
prevent concurrency issues.
BSpec: 71583
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240412094148.808179-2-luciano.coelho@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Do some renames on the register wait functions for clarity and brevity:
intel_de_wait_for_register -> intel_de_wait
intel_de_wait_for_register_fw -> intel_de_wait_fw
__intel_de_wait_for_register -> intel_de_wait_custom
In particular, it seemed odd to have a double-underscored function be
called in a number of places.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240320160123.2904609-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Add intel_de_read64_2x32() wrapper for the uncore version of the same,
and use it to read the high and low frame registers. Avoid duplicating
code for existing helpers.
The slight functional difference is checking that the entire high
register remains the same across two reads, instead of just the part
we're interested in. This should be of no consequence. (Unless those
bits function as a PRNG.)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/33853549adff82045b95af527e14cfdff5712470.1673873708.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
A similar thing was added in intel_uncore_rmw(). Make it available for
display too.
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b82cb29e8ece63e68499307f9e3e83139e590d23.1670433372.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Add more de helpers to be able to avoid direct calls to uncore.
v3 by Jani:
- drop intel_de_write_samevalue/intel_de_rewrite_fw altogether
v2 by Jani:
- drop pcode stuff for now
- rename intel_de_write_samevalue -> intel_de_rewrite_fw
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/0d051554dfeeb4d8aa3bc9136ed111fa35f647d8.1670433372.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Several of our i915 header files, have been including i915_reg.h. This
means that any change to i915_reg.h will trigger a full rebuild of
pretty much every file of the driver, even those that don't have any
kind of register access. Let's delete the i915_reg.h include from all
headers and add an explicit include from the .c files that truly
need the register definitions; those that need a definition of
i915_reg_t for a function definition can get it from i915_reg_defs.h
instead.
We also remove two non-register #define's (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE and
GEN12_SFC_DONE_MAX) into i915_reg_defs.h to allow us to drop the
i915_reg.h include from a couple of headers.
There's probably a lot more header dependency optimization possible, but
the changes here roughly cut the number of files compiled after 'touch
i915_reg.h' in half --- a good first step.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220127234334.4016964-7-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
|
|
We lost the i915_reg_rw tracepoint for a lot of display registers
when we switched from the heavyweight normal register accessors to
the lightweight _fw() variants. See eg. commit dd584fc0711a
("drm/i915: Use I915_READ_FW for plane updates").
Put the tracepoints back so that the register traces might
actually be useful. Hopefully these should be close to free
when the tracepoint is not enabled and thus not slow down
our vblank critical sections significantly.
v2: Copy paste the same-cacheline-hang warning from
intel_uncore.h (Anshuman)
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
|
Add convenience helpers for the most common uncore operations with
struct drm_i915_private * as context rather than struct intel_uncore *.
The goal is to replace all instances of I915_READ(),
I915_POSTING_READ(), I915_WRITE(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW()
in display/ with these, to finally be able to get rid of the implicit
dev_priv local parameter use.
The idea is that any non-u32 reads or writes are special enough that
they can use the intel_uncore_* functions directly.
v2:
- rename the file intel_de.h
- move intel_de_wait_for_* there too
- also add de fw helpers
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200121113915.9813-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
