arm64: poe: Handle spurious Overlay faults

[ Upstream commit 22f3a4f6085951eff28bd1e44d3f388c1d9a5f44 ]

We do not currently issue an ISB after updating POR_EL0 when
context-switching it, for instance. The rationale is that if the old
value of POR_EL0 is more restrictive and causes a fault during
uaccess, the access will be retried [1]. In other words, we are
trading an ISB on every context-switching for the (unlikely)
possibility of a spurious fault. We may also miss faults if the new
value of POR_EL0 is more restrictive, but that's considered
acceptable.

However, as things stand, a spurious Overlay fault results in
uaccess failing right away since it causes fault_from_pkey() to
return true. If an Overlay fault is reported, we therefore need to
double check POR_EL0 against vma_pkey(vma) - this is what
arch_vma_access_permitted() already does.

As it turns out, we already perform that explicit check if no
Overlay fault is reported, and we need to keep that check (see
comment added in fault_from_pkey()). Net result: the Overlay ISS2
bit isn't of much help to decide whether a pkey fault occurred.

Remove the check for the Overlay bit from fault_from_pkey() and
add a comment to try and explain the situation. While at it, also
add a comment to permission_overlay_switch() in case anyone gets
surprised by the lack of ISB.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZtYNGBrcE-j35fpw@arm.com/

Fixes: 160a8e13de6c ("arm64: context switch POR_EL0 register")
Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619160042.2499290-2-kevin.brodsky@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions