spinlock: lockbreak cleanup

The break_lock data structure and code for spinlocks is quite nasty.
Not only does it double the size of a spinlock but it changes locking to
a potentially less optimal trylock.

Put all of that under CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK, and introduce a
__raw_spin_is_contended that uses the lock data itself to determine whether
there are waiters on the lock, to be used if CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK is
not set.

Rename need_lockbreak to spin_needbreak, make it use spin_is_contended to
decouple it from the spinlock implementation, and make it typesafe (rwlocks
do not have any need_lockbreak sites -- why do they even get bloated up
with that break_lock then?).

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 524285e46fa..ba4c88088f6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4945,19 +4945,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_cond_resched);
  */
 int cond_resched_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
 {
+	int resched = need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (need_lockbreak(lock)) {
+	if (spin_needbreak(lock) || resched) {
 		spin_unlock(lock);
-		cpu_relax();
-		ret = 1;
-		spin_lock(lock);
-	}
-	if (need_resched() && system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
-		spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_);
-		_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
-		preempt_enable_no_resched();
-		__cond_resched();
+		if (resched && need_resched())
+			__cond_resched();
+		else
+			cpu_relax();
 		ret = 1;
 		spin_lock(lock);
 	}