summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/exec.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>2011-05-24 17:11:44 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-05-25 08:39:12 -0700
commitd05f3169c0fbca16132ec7c2be71685c6de638b5 (patch)
tree37d82004869fa4e530617883f12cab7538dbd4a6 /fs/exec.c
parent248ac0e1943ad1796393d281b096184719eb3f97 (diff)
mm: make expand_downwards() symmetrical with expand_upwards()
Currently we have expand_upwards exported while expand_downwards is accessible only via expand_stack or expand_stack_downwards. check_stack_guard_page is a nice example of the asymmetry. It uses expand_stack for VM_GROWSDOWN while expand_upwards is called for VM_GROWSUP case. Let's clean this up by exporting both functions and make those names consistent. Let's use expand_{upwards,downwards} because expanding doesn't always involve stack manipulation (an example is ia64_do_page_fault which uses expand_upwards for registers backing store expansion). expand_downwards has to be defined for both CONFIG_STACK_GROWS{UP,DOWN} because get_arg_page calls the downwards version in the early process initialization phase for growsup configuration. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/exec.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/exec.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index c1cf372f17a..e276d5e0abb 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos,
#ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
if (write) {
- ret = expand_stack_downwards(bprm->vma, pos);
+ ret = expand_downwards(bprm->vma, pos);
if (ret < 0)
return NULL;
}