| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
rust-next
Pull pin-init updates from Benno Lossin:
"Added:
- 'Wrapper<T>' trait for creating pin-initializers for wrapper
structs with a structurally pinned value such as 'UnsafeCell<T>' or
'MaybeUninit<T>'.
- 'MaybeZeroable' derive macro to try to derive 'Zeroable', but not
error if not all fields implement it. This is needed to derive
'Zeroable' for all bindgen-generated structs.
- 'unsafe fn cast_[pin_]init()' functions to unsafely change the
initialized type of an initializer. These are utilized by the
'Wrapper<T>' implementations.
Changed:
- Added support for visibility in 'Zeroable' derive macro.
- Added support for 'union's in 'Zeroable' derive macro.
Upstream dev news:
- The CI has been streamlined & some bugs with it have been fixed. I
also added new workflows to check if the user-space version and the
one in the kernel tree have diverged.
- I also started to use the issues [1] tab to keep track of any
problems or unexpected/unwanted things. This should help folks
report and diagnose issues w.r.t. 'pin-init' better.
[1] https://github.com/rust-for-linux/pin-init/issues"
* tag 'pin-init-v6.16' of https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux:
rust: pin-init: improve documentation for `Zeroable` derive macros
rust: pin-init: fix typos
rust: pin-init: add `MaybeZeroable` derive macro
rust: pin-init: allow `Zeroable` derive macro to also be applied to unions
rust: pin-init: allow `pub` fields in `derive(Zeroable)`
rust: pin-init: Update the structural pinning link in readme.
rust: pin-init: Update Changelog and Readme
rust: pin-init: Implement `Wrapper` for `UnsafePinned` behind feature flag.
rust: pin-init: Add the `Wrapper` trait.
rust: pin-init: add `cast_[pin_]init` functions to change the initialized type
rust: pin-init: examples: use `allow` instead of `expect`
rust: pin-init: examples: conditionally enable `feature(lint_reasons)`
rust: pin-init: internal: skip rustfmt formatting of kernel-only module
rust: pin-init: synchronize README.md
|
|
Starting with Rust 1.88.0 (expected 2025-06-26) [1], `rustc` may move
back the `uninlined_format_args` to `style` from `pedantic` (it was
there waiting for rust-analyzer suppotr), and thus we will start to see
lints like:
warning: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> rust/macros/kunit.rs:105:37
|
105 | let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{}", test);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
help: change this to
|
105 - let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{}", test);
105 + let kunit_wrapper_fn_name = format!("kunit_rust_wrapper_{test}");
There is even a case that is a pure removal:
warning: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> rust/macros/module.rs:51:13
|
51 | format!("{field}={content}\0", field = field, content = content)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#uninlined_format_args
help: change this to
|
51 - format!("{field}={content}\0", field = field, content = content)
51 + format!("{field}={content}\0")
The lints all seem like nice cleanups, thus just apply them.
We may want to disable `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` in the future.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs).
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/14160 [1]
Acked-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502140237.1659624-6-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
This derive macro implements `Zeroable` for structs & unions precisely
if all fields also implement `Zeroable` and does nothing otherwise. The
plain `Zeroable` derive macro instead errors when it cannot derive
`Zeroable` safely. The `MaybeZeroable` derive macro is useful in cases
where manual checking is infeasible such as with the bindings crate.
Move the zeroable generics parsing into a standalone function in order
to avoid code duplication between the two derive macros.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/42/commits/1165cdad1a391b923efaf30cf76bc61e38da022e
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
|
|
The `quote` module only is available in the kernel and thus running
`cargo fmt` or `rustfmt internal/src/lib.rs` in the user-space
repository [1] results in:
error: couldn't read `~/pin-init/internal/src/../../../macros/quote.rs`: No such file or directory (os error 2)
--> ~/pin-init/internal/src/lib.rs:25:1
|
25 | mod quote;
| ^^^^^^^^^^
Error writing files: failed to resolve mod `quote`: ~/pin-init/internal/src/../../../macros/quote.rs does not exist
Thus mark it with `rustfmt::skip` when compiling without kernel support.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init [1]
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/pull/33/commits/a6caf1945e51da38761aab4dffa56e63e2baa218
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250414195928.129040-2-benno.lossin@proton.me
Reviewed-by: Christian Schrefl <chrisi.schrefl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
|
|
Remove the last differences between the kernel version and the
user-space version.
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-20-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Synchronize the internal macros crate with the user-space version that
uses the quote crate [1] instead of a custom `quote!` macro. The imports
in the different version are achieved using `cfg` on the kernel config
value. This cfg is always set in the kernel and never set in the
user-space version.
Since the quote crate requires the proc_macro2 crate, imports also need
to be adjusted and `.into()` calls have to be inserted.
Link: https://crates.io/crates/quote [1]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@Kloenk.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-19-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Rename relative paths inside of the crate to still refer to the same
items, also rename paths inside of the kernel crate and adjust the build
system to build the crate.
[ Remove the `expect` (and thus the `lint_reasons` feature) since
the tree now uses `quote!` from `rust/macros/export.rs`. Remove the
`TokenStream` import removal, since it is now used as well.
In addition, temporarily (i.e. just for this commit) use an `--extern
force:alloc` to prevent an unknown `new_uninit` error in the `rustdoc`
target. For context, please see a similar case in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240422090644.525520-1-ojeda@kernel.org/
And adjusted the message above. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-16-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Add infrastructure for moving the initialization API to its own crate.
Covers all make targets such as `rust-analyzer` and `rustdoc`. The tests
of pin-init are not added to `rusttest`, as they are already tested in
the user-space repository [1].
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init [1]
Co-developed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-15-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the documentation of proc-macros from pin-init-internal into
pin-init. This is because documentation can only reference types from
dependencies and pin-init-internal cannot have pin-init as a dependency,
as that would be cyclic.
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-5-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation of splitting off the pin-init crate from the kernel
crate, move all pin-init API code (including proc-macros) into
`rust/pin-init`.
Moved modules have their import path adjusted via the `#[path = "..."]`
attribute. This allows the files to still be imported in the kernel
crate even though the files are in different directories.
Code that is moved out of files (but the file itself stays where it is)
is imported via the `include!` macro. This also allows the code to be
moved while still being part of the kernel crate.
Note that this commit moves the generics parsing code out of the GPL-2.0
file `rust/macros/helpers.rs` into the Apache-2.0 OR MIT file
`rust/pin_init/internal/src/helpers.rs`. I am the sole author of that
code and it already is available with that license at [1].
The same is true for the entry-points of the proc-macros `pin_data`,
`pinned_drop` and `derive_zeroable` in `rust/macros/lib.rs` that are
moved to `rust/pin_data/internal/src/lib.rs`. Although there are some
smaller patches that fix the doctests.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pinned-init [1]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-3-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
