summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/dsa/tag.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-12-18net: dsa: restore dsa_software_vlan_untag() ability to operate on ↵Vladimir Oltean
VLAN-untagged traffic Robert Hodaszi reports that locally terminated traffic towards VLAN-unaware bridge ports is broken with ocelot-8021q. He is describing the same symptoms as for commit 1f9fc48fd302 ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges"). For context, the set merged as "VLAN fixes for Ocelot driver": https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240815000707.2006121-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/ was developed in a slightly different form earlier this year, in January. Initially, the switch was unconditionally configured to set OCELOT_ES0_TAG when using ocelot-8021q, regardless of port operating mode. This led to the situation where VLAN-unaware bridge ports would always push their PVID - see ocelot_vlan_unaware_pvid() - a negligible value anyway - into RX packets. To strip this in software, we would have needed DSA to know what private VID the switch chose for VLAN-unaware bridge ports, and pushed into the packets. This was implemented downstream, and a remnant of it remains in the form of a comment mentioning ds->ops->get_private_vid(), as something which would maybe need to be considered in the future. However, for upstream, it was deemed inappropriate, because it would mean introducing yet another behavior for stripping VLAN tags from VLAN-unaware bridge ports, when one already existed (ds->untag_bridge_pvid). The latter has been marked as obsolete along with an explanation why it is logically broken, but still, it would have been confusing. So, for upstream, felix_update_tag_8021q_rx_rule() was developed, which essentially changed the state of affairs from "Felix with ocelot-8021q delivers all packets as VLAN-tagged towards the CPU" into "Felix with ocelot-8021q delivers all packets from VLAN-aware bridge ports towards the CPU". This was done on the premise that in VLAN-unaware mode, there's nothing useful in the VLAN tags, and we can avoid introducing ds->ops->get_private_vid() in the DSA receive path if we configure the switch to not push those VLAN tags into packets in the first place. Unfortunately, and this is when the trainwreck started, the selftests developed initially and posted with the series were not re-ran. dsa_software_vlan_untag() was initially written given the assumption that users of this feature would send _all_ traffic as VLAN-tagged. It was only partially adapted to the new scheme, by removing ds->ops->get_private_vid(), which also used to be necessary in standalone ports mode. Where the trainwreck became even worse is that I had a second opportunity to think about this, when the dsa_software_vlan_untag() logic change initially broke sja1105, in commit 1f9fc48fd302 ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix reception from VLAN-unaware bridges"). I did not connect the dots that it also breaks ocelot-8021q, for pretty much the same reason that not all received packets will be VLAN-tagged. To be compatible with the optimized Felix control path which runs felix_update_tag_8021q_rx_rule() to only push VLAN tags when useful (in VLAN-aware mode), we need to restore the old dsa_software_vlan_untag() logic. The blamed commit introduced the assumption that dsa_software_vlan_untag() will see only VLAN-tagged packets, assumption which is false. What corrupts RX traffic is the fact that we call skb_vlan_untag() on packets which are not VLAN-tagged in the first place. Fixes: 93e4649efa96 ("net: dsa: provide a software untagging function on RX for VLAN-aware bridges") Reported-by: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@digi.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241215163334.615427-1-robert.hodaszi@digi.com/ Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241216135059.1258266-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-08-16net: dsa: provide a software untagging function on RX for VLAN-aware bridgesVladimir Oltean
Through code analysis, I realized that the ds->untag_bridge_pvid logic is contradictory - see the newly added FIXME above the kernel-doc for dsa_software_untag_vlan_unaware_bridge(). Moreover, for the Felix driver, I need something very similar, but which is actually _not_ contradictory: untag the bridge PVID on RX, but for VLAN-aware bridges. The existing logic does it for VLAN-unaware bridges. Since I don't want to change the functionality of drivers which were supposedly properly tested with the ds->untag_bridge_pvid flag, I have introduced a new one: ds->untag_vlan_aware_bridge_pvid, and I have refactored the DSA reception code into a common path for both flags. TODO: both flags should be unified under a single ds->software_vlan_untag, which users of both current flags should set. This is not something that can be carried out right away. It needs very careful examination of all drivers which make use of this functionality, since some of them actually get this wrong in the first place. For example, commit 9130c2d30c17 ("net: dsa: microchip: ksz8795: Use software untagging on CPU port") uses this in a driver which has ds->configure_vlan_while_not_filtering = true. The latter mechanism has been known for many years to be broken by design: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CABumfLzJmXDN_W-8Z=p9KyKUVi_HhS7o_poBkeKHS2BkAiyYpw@mail.gmail.com/ and we have the situation of 2 bugs canceling each other. There is no private VLAN, and the port follows the PVID of the VLAN-unaware bridge. So, it's kinda ok for that driver to use the ds->untag_bridge_pvid mechanism, in a broken way. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2023-10-24net: dsa: Use conduit and user termsFlorian Fainelli
Use more inclusive terms throughout the DSA subsystem by moving away from "master" which is replaced by "conduit" and "slave" which is replaced by "user". No functional changes. Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023181729.1191071-2-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-04-23net: dsa: update TX path comments to not mention skb_mac_header()Vladimir Oltean
Once commit 6d1ccff62780 ("net: reset mac header in dev_start_xmit()") will be reverted, it will no longer be true that skb->data points at skb_mac_header(skb) - since the skb->mac_header will not be set - so stop saying that, and just say that it points to the MAC header. I've reviewed vlan_insert_tag() and it does not *actually* depend on skb_mac_header(), so reword that to avoid the confusion. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-11-22net: dsa: move tagging protocol code to tag.{c,h}Vladimir Oltean
It would be nice if tagging protocol drivers could include just the header they need, since they are (mostly) data path and isolated from most of the other DSA core code does. Create a tag.c and a tag.h file which are meant to support tagging protocol drivers. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>