Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Reorganize the Curve25519 library code:
- Build a single libcurve25519 module, instead of up to three modules:
libcurve25519, libcurve25519-generic, and an arch-specific module.
- Move the arch-specific Curve25519 code from arch/$(SRCARCH)/crypto/ to
lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/. Centralize the build rules into
lib/crypto/Makefile and lib/crypto/Kconfig.
- Include the arch-specific code directly in lib/crypto/curve25519.c via
a header, rather than using a separate .c file.
- Eliminate the entanglement with CRYPTO. CRYPTO_LIB_CURVE25519 no
longer selects CRYPTO, and the arch-specific Curve25519 code no longer
depends on CRYPTO.
This brings Curve25519 in line with the latest conventions for
lib/crypto/, used by other algorithms. The exception is that I kept the
generic code in separate translation units for now. (Some of the
function names collide between the x86 and generic Curve25519 code. And
the Curve25519 functions are very long anyway, so inlining doesn't
matter as much for Curve25519 as it does for some other algorithms.)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250906213523.84915-11-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
As was done with the other algorithms, reorganize the BLAKE2s code so
that the generic implementation and the arch-specific "glue" code is
consolidated into a single translation unit, so that the compiler will
inline the functions and automatically decide whether to include the
generic code in the resulting binary or not.
Similarly, also consolidate the build rules into
lib/crypto/{Makefile,Kconfig}. This removes the last uses of
lib/crypto/{arm,x86}/{Makefile,Kconfig}, so remove those too.
Don't keep the !KMSAN dependency. It was needed only for other
algorithms such as ChaCha that initialize memory from assembly code.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827151131.27733-12-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
When support for a crypto algorithm is enabled, the arch-optimized
implementation of that algorithm should be enabled too. We've learned
this the hard way many times over the years: people regularly forget to
enable the arch-optimized implementations of the crypto algorithms,
resulting in significant performance being left on the table.
Currently, BLAKE2s support is always enabled ('obj-y'), since random.c
uses it. Therefore, the arch-optimized BLAKE2s code, which exists for
ARM and x86_64, should be always enabled too. Let's do that.
Note that the effect on kernel image size is very small and should not
be a concern. On ARM, enabling CRYPTO_BLAKE2S_ARM actually *shrinks*
the kernel size by about 1200 bytes, since the ARM-optimized
blake2s_compress() completely replaces the generic blake2s_compress().
On x86_64, enabling CRYPTO_BLAKE2S_X86 increases the kernel size by
about 1400 bytes, as the generic blake2s_compress() is still included as
a fallback; however, for context, that is only about a quarter the size
of the generic blake2s_compress(). The x86_64 optimized BLAKE2s code
uses much less icache at runtime than the generic code.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827151131.27733-10-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Consolidate the ChaCha code into a single module (excluding
chacha-block-generic.c which remains always built-in for random.c),
similar to various other algorithms:
- Each arch now provides a header file lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/chacha.h,
replacing lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/chacha*.c. The header defines
chacha_crypt_arch() and hchacha_block_arch(). It is included by
lib/crypto/chacha.c, and thus the code gets built into the single
libchacha module, with improved inlining in some cases.
- Whether arch-optimized ChaCha is buildable is now controlled centrally
by lib/crypto/Kconfig instead of by lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Kconfig.
The conditions for enabling it remain the same as before, and it
remains enabled by default.
- Any additional arch-specific translation units for the optimized
ChaCha code, such as assembly files, are now compiled by
lib/crypto/Makefile instead of lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile.
This removes the last use for the Makefile and Kconfig files in the
arm64, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 subdirectories of lib/crypto/. So
also remove those files and the references to them.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827151131.27733-7-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
chacha_is_arch_optimized() is no longer used, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827151131.27733-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Consolidate the Poly1305 code into a single module, similar to various
other algorithms (SHA-1, SHA-256, SHA-512, etc.):
- Each arch now provides a header file lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/poly1305.h,
replacing lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/poly1305*.c. The header defines
poly1305_block_init(), poly1305_blocks(), poly1305_emit(), and
optionally poly1305_mod_init_arch(). It is included by
lib/crypto/poly1305.c, and thus the code gets built into the single
libpoly1305 module, with improved inlining in some cases.
- Whether arch-optimized Poly1305 is buildable is now controlled
centrally by lib/crypto/Kconfig instead of by
lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Kconfig. The conditions for enabling it remain
the same as before, and it remains enabled by default. (The PPC64 one
remains unconditionally disabled due to 'depends on BROKEN'.)
- Any additional arch-specific translation units for the optimized
Poly1305 code, such as assembly files, are now compiled by
lib/crypto/Makefile instead of lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile.
A special consideration is needed because the Adiantum code uses the
poly1305_core_*() functions directly. For now, just carry forward that
approach. This means retaining the CRYPTO_LIB_POLY1305_GENERIC kconfig
symbol, and keeping the poly1305_core_*() functions in separate
translation units. So it's not quite as streamlined I've done with the
other hash functions, but we still get a single libpoly1305 module.
Note: to see the diff from the arm, arm64, and x86 .c files to the new
.h files, view this commit with 'git show -M10'.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250829152513.92459-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
poly1305_is_arch_optimized() is unused, so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250829152513.92459-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Drop 'inline' from all the *_mod_init_arch() functions so that the
compiler will warn about any bugs where they are unused due to not being
wired up properly. (There are no such bugs currently, so this just
establishes a more robust convention for the future. Of course, these
functions also tend to get inlined anyway, regardless of the keyword.)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250816020457.432040-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Since sha512_kunit tests the fallback code paths without using
crypto_simd_disabled_for_test, make the SHA-512 code just use the
underlying may_use_simd() and irq_fpu_usable() functions directly
instead of crypto_simd_usable(). This eliminates an unnecessary layer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731223651.136939-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Since sha256_kunit tests the fallback code paths without using
crypto_simd_disabled_for_test, make the SHA-256 code just use the
underlying may_use_simd() and irq_fpu_usable() functions directly
instead of crypto_simd_usable(). This eliminates an unnecessary layer.
While doing this, also add likely() annotations, and fix a minor
inconsistency where the static keys in the sha256.h files were in a
different place than in the corresponding sha1.h and sha512.h files.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731223510.136650-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the arm-optimized SHA-1 code via arm-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha1_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-1 library
functions be arm-optimized, and it fixes the longstanding issue where
the arm-optimized SHA-1 code was disabled by default. SHA-1 still
remains available through crypto_shash, but individual architectures no
longer need to handle it.
To match sha1_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of the
assembly functions from int to size_t. The assembly functions actually
already treated it as size_t.
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712232329.818226-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Fix poly1305-armv4.pl to not do '.globl poly1305_blocks_neon' when
poly1305_blocks_neon() is not defined. Then, remove the empty __weak
definition of poly1305_blocks_neon(), which was still needed only
because of that unnecessary globl statement. (It also used to be needed
because the compiler could generate calls to it when
CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON=n, but that has been fixed.)
Thanks to Arnd Bergmann for reporting that the globl statement in the
asm file was still depending on the weak symbol.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711212822.6372-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Restore the SIMD usability check that was removed by commit 773426f4771b
("crypto: arm/poly1305 - Add block-only interface").
This safety check is cheap and is well worth eliminating a footgun.
While the Poly1305 functions should not be called when SIMD registers
are unusable, if they are anyway, they should just do the right thing
instead of corrupting random tasks' registers and/or computing incorrect
MACs. Fixing this is also needed for poly1305_kunit to pass.
Just use may_use_simd() instead of the original crypto_simd_usable(),
since poly1305_kunit won't rely on crypto_simd_disabled_for_test.
Fixes: 773426f4771b ("crypto: arm/poly1305 - Add block-only interface")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250706231100.176113-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Consolidate the CPU-based SHA-256 code into a single module, following
what I did with SHA-512:
- Each arch now provides a header file lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/sha256.h,
replacing lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/sha256.c. The header defines
sha256_blocks() and optionally sha256_mod_init_arch(). It is included
by lib/crypto/sha256.c, and thus the code gets built into the single
libsha256 module, with proper inlining and dead code elimination.
- sha256_blocks_generic() is moved from lib/crypto/sha256-generic.c into
lib/crypto/sha256.c. It's now a static function marked with
__maybe_unused, so the compiler automatically eliminates it in any
cases where it's not used.
- Whether arch-optimized SHA-256 is buildable is now controlled
centrally by lib/crypto/Kconfig instead of by
lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Kconfig. The conditions for enabling it remain
the same as before, and it remains enabled by default.
- Any additional arch-specific translation units for the optimized
SHA-256 code (such as assembly files) are now compiled by
lib/crypto/Makefile instead of lib/crypto/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-13-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Remove sha256_is_arch_optimized(), since it is no longer used.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-12-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
The previous commit made the SHA-256 compression function state be
strongly typed, but it wasn't propagated all the way down to the
implementations of it. Do that now.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of having both sha256_blocks_arch() and sha256_blocks_simd(),
instead have just sha256_blocks_arch() which uses the most efficient
implementation that is available in the calling context.
This is simpler, as it reduces the API surface. It's also safer, since
sha256_blocks_arch() just works in all contexts, including contexts
where the FPU/SIMD/vector registers cannot be used. This doesn't mean
that SHA-256 computations *should* be done in such contexts, but rather
we should just do the right thing instead of corrupting a random task's
registers. Eliminating this footgun and simplifying the code is well
worth the very small performance cost of doing the check.
Note: in the case of arm and arm64, what used to be sha256_blocks_arch()
is renamed back to its original name of sha256_block_data_order().
sha256_blocks_arch() is now used for the higher-level dispatch function.
This renaming also required an update to lib/crypto/arm64/sha512.h,
since sha2-armv8.pl is shared by both SHA-256 and SHA-512.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160645.3198-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Move the contents of arch/arm/lib/crypto/ into lib/crypto/arm/.
The new code organization makes a lot more sense for how this code
actually works and is developed. In particular, it makes it possible to
build each algorithm as a single module, with better inlining and dead
code elimination. For a more detailed explanation, see the patchset
which did this for the CRC library code:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250607200454.73587-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/.
Also see the patchset which did this for SHA-512:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20250616014019.415791-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/
This is just a preparatory commit, which does the move to get the files
into their new location but keeps them building the same way as before.
Later commits will make the actual improvements to the way the
arch-optimized code is integrated for each algorithm.
Add a gitignore entry for the removed directory arch/arm/lib/crypto/ so
that people don't accidentally commit leftover generated files.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250619191908.134235-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|
|
Instead of exposing the arm-optimized SHA-512 code via arm-specific
crypto_shash algorithms, instead just implement the sha512_blocks()
library function. This is much simpler, it makes the SHA-512 (and
SHA-384) library functions be arm-optimized, and it fixes the
longstanding issue where the arm-optimized SHA-512 code was disabled by
default. SHA-512 still remains available through crypto_shash, but
individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
To match sha512_blocks(), change the type of the nblocks parameter of
the assembly functions from int to size_t. The assembly functions
actually already treated it as size_t.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250630160320.2888-8-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
|