summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/netfs/read_pgpriv2.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-07-14netfs: Fix race between cache write completion and ALL_QUEUED being setDavid Howells
When netfslib is issuing subrequests, the subrequests start processing immediately and may complete before we reach the end of the issuing function. At the end of the issuing function we set NETFS_RREQ_ALL_QUEUED to indicate to the collector that we aren't going to issue any more subreqs and that it can do the final notifications and cleanup. Now, this isn't a problem if the request is synchronous (NETFS_RREQ_OFFLOAD_COLLECTION is unset) as the result collection will be done in-thread and we're guaranteed an opportunity to run the collector. However, if the request is asynchronous, collection is primarily triggered by the termination of subrequests queuing it on a workqueue. Now, a race can occur here if the app thread sets ALL_QUEUED after the last subrequest terminates. This can happen most easily with the copy2cache code (as used by Ceph) where, in the collection routine of a read request, an asynchronous write request is spawned to copy data to the cache. Folios are added to the write request as they're unlocked, but there may be a delay before ALL_QUEUED is set as the write subrequests may complete before we get there. If all the write subreqs have finished by the ALL_QUEUED point, no further events happen and the collection never happens, leaving the request hanging. Fix this by queuing the collector after setting ALL_QUEUED. This is a bit heavy-handed and it may be sufficient to do it only if there are no extant subreqs. Also add a tracepoint to cross-reference both requests in a copy-to-request operation and add a trace to the netfs_rreq tracepoint to indicate the setting of ALL_QUEUED. Fixes: e2d46f2ec332 ("netfs: Change the read result collector to only use one work item") Reported-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKPOu+8z_ijTLHdiCYGU_Uk7yYD=shxyGLwfe-L7AV3DhebS3w@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250711151005.2956810-3-dhowells@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.org> cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org> cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com> cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-07-14netfs: Fix copy-to-cache so that it performs collection with ceph+fscacheDavid Howells
The netfs copy-to-cache that is used by Ceph with local caching sets up a new request to write data just read to the cache. The request is started and then left to look after itself whilst the app continues. The request gets notified by the backing fs upon completion of the async DIO write, but then tries to wake up the app because NETFS_RREQ_OFFLOAD_COLLECTION isn't set - but the app isn't waiting there, and so the request just hangs. Fix this by setting NETFS_RREQ_OFFLOAD_COLLECTION which causes the notification from the backing filesystem to put the collection onto a work queue instead. Fixes: e2d46f2ec332 ("netfs: Change the read result collector to only use one work item") Reported-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKPOu+8z_ijTLHdiCYGU_Uk7yYD=shxyGLwfe-L7AV3DhebS3w@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250711151005.2956810-2-dhowells@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.org> cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org> cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> cc: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com> cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-05-21netfs: Fix the request's work item to not require a refDavid Howells
When the netfs_io_request struct's work item is queued, it must be supplied with a ref to the work item struct to prevent it being deallocated whilst on the queue or whilst it is being processed. This is tricky to manage as we have to get a ref before we try and queue it and then we may find it's already queued and is thus already holding a ref - in which case we have to try and get rid of the ref again. The problem comes if we're in BH or IRQ context and need to drop the ref: if netfs_put_request() reduces the count to 0, we have to do the cleanup - but the cleanup may need to wait. Fix this by adding a new work item to the request, ->cleanup_work, and dispatching that when the refcount hits zero. That can then synchronously cancel any outstanding work on the main work item before doing the cleanup. Adding a new work item also deals with another problem upstream where it's sometimes changing the work func in the put function and requeuing it - which has occasionally in the past caused the cleanup to happen incorrectly. As a bonus, this allows us to get rid of the 'was_async' parameter from a bunch of functions. This indicated whether the put function might not be permitted to sleep. Fixes: 3d3c95046742 ("netfs: Provide readahead and readpage netfs helpers") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250519090707.2848510-4-dhowells@redhat.com cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com> cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-12-20netfs: Change the read result collector to only use one work itemDavid Howells
Change the way netfslib collects read results to do all the collection for a particular read request using a single work item that walks along the subrequest queue as subrequests make progress or complete, unlocking folios progressively rather than doing the unlock in parallel as parallel requests come in. The code is remodelled to be more like the write-side code, though only using a single stream. This makes it more directly comparable and thus easier to duplicate fixes between the two sides. This has a number of advantages: (1) It's simpler. There doesn't need to be a complex donation mechanism to handle mismatches between the size and alignment of subrequests and folios. The collector unlocks folios as the subrequests covering each complete. (2) It should cause less scheduler overhead as there's a single work item in play unlocking pages in parallel when a read gets split up into a lot of subrequests instead of one per subrequest. Whilst the parallellism is nice in theory, in practice, the vast majority of loads are sequential reads of the whole file, so committing a bunch of threads to unlocking folios out of order doesn't help in those cases. (3) It should make it easier to implement content decryption. A folio cannot be decrypted until all the requests that contribute to it have completed - and, again, most loads are sequential and so, most of the time, we want to begin decryption sequentially (though it's great if the decryption can happen in parallel). There is a disadvantage in that we're losing the ability to decrypt and unlock things on an as-things-arrive basis which may affect some applications. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216204124.3752367-28-dhowells@redhat.com cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-12-20netfs: Abstract out a rolling folio buffer implementationDavid Howells
A rolling buffer is a series of folios held in a list of folio_queues. New folios and folio_queue structs may be inserted at the head simultaneously with spent ones being removed from the tail without the need for locking. The rolling buffer includes an iov_iter and it has to be careful managing this as the list of folio_queues is extended such that an oops doesn't incurred because the iterator was pointing to the end of a folio_queue segment that got appended to and then removed. We need to use the mechanism twice, once for read and once for write, and, in future patches, we will use a second rolling buffer to handle bounce buffering for content encryption. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216204124.3752367-6-dhowells@redhat.com cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-12-20netfs: Fix the (non-)cancellation of copy when cache is temporarily disabledDavid Howells
When the caching for a cookie is temporarily disabled (e.g. due to a DIO write on that file), future copying to the cache for that file is disabled until all fds open on that file are closed. However, if netfslib is using the deprecated PG_private_2 method (such as is currently used by ceph), and decides it wants to copy to the cache, netfs_advance_write() will just bail at the first check seeing that the cache stream is unavailable, and indicate that it dealt with all the content. This means that we have no subrequests to provide notifications to drive the state machine or even to pin the request and the request just gets discarded, leaving the folios with PG_private_2 set. Fix this by jumping directly to cancel the request if the cache is not available. That way, we don't remove mark3 from the folio_queue list and netfs_pgpriv2_cancel() will clean up the folios. This was found by running the generic/013 xfstest against ceph with an active cache and the "-o fsc" option passed to ceph. That would usually hang Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading") Reported-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKPOu+_4m80thNy5_fvROoxBm689YtA0dZ-=gcmkzwYSY4syqw@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213135013.2964079-11-dhowells@redhat.com cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-12cachefiles, netfs: Fix write to partial block at EOFDavid Howells
Because it uses DIO writes, cachefiles is unable to make a write to the backing file if that write is not aligned to and sized according to the backing file's DIO block alignment. This makes it tricky to handle a write to the cache where the EOF on the network file is not correctly aligned. To get around this, netfslib attempts to tell the driver it is calling how much more data there is available beyond the EOF that it can use to pad the write (netfslib preclears the part of the folio above the EOF). However, it tries to tell the cache what the maximum length is, but doesn't calculate this correctly; and, in any case, cachefiles actually ignores the value and just skips the block. Fix this by: (1) Change the value passed to indicate the amount of extra data that can be added to the operation (now ->submit_extendable_to). This is much simpler to calculate as it's just the end of the folio minus the top of the data within the folio - rather than having to account for data spread over multiple folios. (2) Make cachefiles add some of this data if the subrequest it is given ends at the network file's i_size if the extra data is sufficient to pad out to a whole block. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814203850.2240469-22-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2 Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-12netfs: Speed up buffered readingDavid Howells
Improve the efficiency of buffered reads in a number of ways: (1) Overhaul the algorithm in general so that it's a lot more compact and split the read submission code between buffered and unbuffered versions. The unbuffered version can be vastly simplified. (2) Read-result collection is handed off to a work queue rather than being done in the I/O thread. Multiple subrequests can be processes simultaneously. (3) When a subrequest is collected, any folios it fully spans are collected and "spare" data on either side is donated to either the previous or the next subrequest in the sequence. Notes: (*) Readahead expansion is massively slows down fio, presumably because it causes a load of extra allocations, both folio and xarray, up front before RPC requests can be transmitted. (*) RDMA with cifs does appear to work, both with SIW and RXE. (*) PG_private_2-based reading and copy-to-cache is split out into its own file and altered to use folio_queue. Note that the copy to the cache now creates a new write transaction against the cache and adds the folios to be copied into it. This allows it to use part of the writeback I/O code. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814203850.2240469-20-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2 Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>