| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We have a single transaction abort call that can be due to an error from
one of two calls to update_block_group_item(). Unfold the transaction
abort calls so that if they happen we know which update_block_group_item()
call failed.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_zone_finish() can fail for several reason. If it is -EAGAIN, we need
to try it again later. So, put the block group to the retry list properly.
Failing to do so will keep the removable block group intact until remount
and can causes unnecessary ENOSPC.
Fixes: 74e91b12b115 ("btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are some reports of "unable to find chunk map for logical 2147483648
length 16384" error message appears in dmesg. This means some IOs are
occurring after a block group is removed.
When a metadata tree node is cleaned on a zoned setup, we keep that node
still dirty and write it out not to create a write hole. However, this can
make a block group's used bytes == 0 while there is a dirty region left.
Such an unused block group is moved into the unused_bg list and processed
for removal. When the removal succeeds, the block group is removed from the
transaction->dirty_bgs list, so the unused dirty nodes in the block group
are not sent at the transaction commit time. It will be written at some
later time e.g, sync or umount, and causes "unable to find chunk map"
errors.
This can happen relatively easy on SMR whose zone size is 256MB. However,
calling do_zone_finish() on such block group returns -EAGAIN and keep that
block group intact, which is why the issue is hidden until now.
Fixes: afba2bc036b0 ("btrfs: zoned: implement active zone tracking")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It's just a simple wrapper around btrfs_clear_extent_bit() that passes a
NULL for its last argument (a cached extent state record), plus there is
not counter part - we have a btrfs_set_extent_bit() but we do not have a
btrfs_set_extent_bits() (plural version). So just remove it and make all
callers use btrfs_clear_extent_bit() directly.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When BTRFS is doing automatic block-group reclaim, it is spamming the
kernel log messages a lot.
Add a 'verbose' parameter to btrfs_relocate_chunk() and
btrfs_relocate_block_group() to control the verbosity of these log
message. This way the old behaviour of printing log messages on a
user-space initiated balance operation can be kept while excessive log
spamming due to auto reclaim is mitigated.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Remove the log message before reclaiming a chunk in
btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(). Especially with automatic block-group
reclaiming these messages spam the kernel log.
Note there is also a tracepoint for the same condition to ease debugging.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_dump_space_info()'s parameter dump_block_groups is used as a boolean
although it is defined as an integer.
Change it from int to bool.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
A few of the free space tree exported functions have a 'btrfs_' prefix in
their name, but most don't. Not only is this inconsistent, the preferred
style is to have such a prefix, to avoid potential collisions in the
future with other kernel code and offer a somewhat better readibility by
making it obvious in calls sites that we are calling btrfs specific code.
So add the 'btrfs_' prefix to all free space tree functions that are
missing it.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We are using an integer for the 'delalloc' argument but all we need is a
boolean, so switch the type to 'bool' and rename the parameter to
'is_delalloc' to better match the fact that it's a boolean.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
clean_pinned_extents()
Instead of detecting if there is a previous transaction by comparing the
current transaction's list prev member to the head of the transaction
list (fs_info->trans_list), use the list_is_first() helper which contains
that logic and the naming makes sense since a new transaction is always
added to the end of the list fs_info->trans_list with list_add_tail().
We are also extracting the previous transaction with list_last_entry()
against the transaction, which is correct but confusing because that
function is usually meant to be used against a pointer to the start of a
list and not a member of a list. It is easier to reason by either calling
list_first_entry() against the list fs_info->trans_list, since we can
never have more than two transactions in the list, or by calling
list_prev_entry() against the transaction. So change that to use the later
method.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Make the extent allocator and the chunk allocator aware of the sub-space.
It now uses BTRFS_SUB_GROUP_DATA_RELOC sub-space for data relocation block
group, and uses BTRFS_SUB_GROUP_TREELOG for metadata tree-log block group.
And, it needs to check the space_info is the right one when a block group
candidate is given. Also, new block group should now belong to the
specified one.
Now that, block_group->space_info is always set before
btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(), we no longer need to "find" the space_info.
So, rename the variable name to address that as well.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Current code assumes we have only one space_info for each block group type
(DATA, METADATA, and SYSTEM). We sometime need multiple space infos to
manage special block groups.
One example is handling the data relocation block group for the zoned mode.
That block group is dedicated for writing relocated data and we cannot
allocate any regular extent from that block group, which is implemented in
the zoned extent allocator. This block group still belongs to the normal
data space_info. So, when all the normal data block groups are full and
there is some free space in the dedicated block group, the space_info
looks to have some free space, while it cannot allocate normal extent
anymore. That results in a strange ENOSPC error. We need to have a
space_info for the relocation data block group to represent the situation
properly.
Adds a basic infrastructure for having a "sub-group" of a space_info:
creation and removing. A sub-group space_info belongs to one of the
primary space_infos and has the same flags as its parent.
This commit first introduces the relocation data sub-space_info, and the
next commit will introduce tree-log sub-space_info. In the future, it could
be useful to implement tiered storage for btrfs e.g. by implementing a
sub-group space_info for block groups resides on a fast storage.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Add struct btrfs_space_info parameter to btrfs_make_block_group(), its
related functions and related struct. Passed space_info will have a new
block group.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Take a btrfs_space_info argument in btrfs_chunk_alloc(). New block group
will belong to that space_info.
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Factor out check_removing_space_info() from btrfs_free_block_groups(). It
sanity checks a to-be-removed space_info. There is no functional change.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Old code has a lot of int for bool return values, bool is recommended
and done in new code. Convert the trivial cases that do simple 0/false
and 1/true. Functions comment are updated if needed.
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Using the helper makes it a bit more clear that we're accessing the
first list entry.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
These functions are exported so they should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by
convention, to make it clear they are btrfs specific and to avoid
collisions with functions from elsewhere in the kernel.
So add a 'btrfs_' prefix to their name to make it clear they are from
btrfs.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is an exported function so it should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by
convention, to make it clear it's btrfs specific and to avoid collisions
with functions from elsewhere in the kernel.
So rename it to btrfs_set_extent_bit().
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
These functions are exported so they should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by
convention, to make it clear they are btrfs specific and to avoid
collisions with functions from elsewhere in the kernel. One of them has a
double underscore prefix which is also discouraged.
So remove double underscore prefix where applicable and add a 'btrfs_'
prefix to their name to make it clear they are from btrfs.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The most trivial pattern for the auto freeing when the variable is
declared with the macro and the final btrfs_free_path() is removed.
There are almost none goto -> return conversions and there's no other
function cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The EXTENT_UPTODATE io tree flag is now used only to mark ranges in the
fs_info->excluded_extents as used by super blocks and not available for
extent allocation (to prevent adding those ranges as free space in the
in memory space caches). As we can use any flag for that purpose, and
we are using EXTENT_DIRTY for the pinned extents io tree for example,
remove the EXTENT_UPTODATE flag and use instead EXTENT_DIRTY for the
excluded extents io tree.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At btrfs_add_new_free_space() we keep searching for ranges in the excluded
extents io tree that have the EXTENT_DIRTY bit set, however we never ever
set that bit for ranges in that tree. That is a leftover from when that
function used the global freed extents trees (fs_info->freed_extents[2]),
where we used both the EXTENT_DIRTY and EXTENT_UPTODATE bits, but those
trees are gone with commit fe119a6eeb67 ("btrfs: switch to per-transaction
pinned extents"), which introduced the fs_info->excluded_extents io tree,
where only EXTENT_UPTODATE is set.
So remove the EXTENT_DIRTY bit search at btrfs_add_new_free_space().
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Similar to mark_bg_unused() and mark_bg_to_reclaim(), we have a few
places that use bg_list with refcounting, mostly for retrying failures
to reclaim/delete unused.
These have custom logic for handling locking and refcounting the bg_list
properly, but they actually all want to do the same thing, so pull that
logic out into a helper. Unfortunately, mark_bg_unused() does still need
the NEW flag to avoid prematurely marking stuff unused (even if refcount
is fine, we don't want to mess with bg creation), so it cannot use the
new helper.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
All other users of the bg_list list_head increment the refcount when
adding to a list and decrement it when deleting from the list. Just for
the sake of uniformity and to try to avoid refcounting bugs, do it for
this list as well.
This does not fix any known ref-counting bug, as the reference belongs
to a single task (trans_handle is not shared and this represents
trans_handle->new_bgs linkage) and will not lose its original refcount
while that thread is running. And BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW protects against
ref-counting errors "moving" the block group to the unused list without
taking a ref.
With that said, I still believe it is simpler to just hold the extra ref
count for this list user as well.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Block group creation is done in two phases, which results in a slightly
unintuitive property: a block group can be allocated/deallocated from
after btrfs_make_block_group() adds it to the space_info with
btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(), but before creation is completely completed
in btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). As a result, it is possible for a
block group to go unused and have 'btrfs_mark_bg_unused' called on it
concurrently with 'btrfs_create_pending_block_groups'. This causes a
number of issues, which were fixed with the block group flag
'BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW'.
However, this fix is not quite complete. Since it does not use the
unused_bg_lock, it is possible for the following race to occur:
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups btrfs_mark_bg_unused
if list_empty // false
list_del_init
clear_bit
else if (test_bit) // true
list_move_tail
And we get into the exact same broken ref count and invalid new_bgs
state for transaction cleanup that BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_NEW was designed to
prevent.
The broken refcount aspect will result in a warning like:
[1272.943527] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
[1272.943967] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 61 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
[1272.944731] Modules linked in: btrfs virtio_net xor zstd_compress raid6_pq null_blk [last unloaded: btrfs]
[1272.945550] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 61 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.14.0-rc5+ #108
[1272.946368] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[1272.946585] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
[1272.947273] Workqueue: btrfs_discard btrfs_discard_workfn [btrfs]
[1272.947788] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
[1272.949532] RSP: 0018:ffffbf1200247df0 EFLAGS: 00010282
[1272.949901] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa14b00e3f800 RCX: 0000000000000000
[1272.950437] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffbf1200247c78 RDI: 00000000ffffdfff
[1272.950986] RBP: ffffa14b00dc2860 R08: 00000000ffffdfff R09: ffffffff90526268
[1272.951512] R10: ffffffff904762c0 R11: 0000000063666572 R12: ffffa14b00dc28c0
[1272.952024] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffa14b00dc2868 R15: 000001285dcd12c0
[1272.952850] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa14d33c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[1272.953458] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1272.953931] CR2: 00007f838cbda000 CR3: 000000010104e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[1272.954474] Call Trace:
[1272.954655] <TASK>
[1272.954812] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
[1272.955173] ? __warn.cold+0x93/0xd7
[1272.955487] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
[1272.955816] ? report_bug+0xe7/0x120
[1272.956103] ? handle_bug+0x53/0x90
[1272.956424] ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
[1272.956700] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[1272.957011] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xba/0x110
[1272.957399] btrfs_discard_cancel_work.cold+0x26/0x2b [btrfs]
[1272.957853] btrfs_put_block_group.cold+0x5d/0x8e [btrfs]
[1272.958289] btrfs_discard_workfn+0x194/0x380 [btrfs]
[1272.958729] process_one_work+0x130/0x290
[1272.959026] worker_thread+0x2ea/0x420
[1272.959335] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[1272.959644] kthread+0xd7/0x1c0
[1272.959872] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[1272.960172] ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
[1272.960474] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[1272.960745] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[1272.961035] </TASK>
[1272.961238] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Though we have seen them in the async discard workfn as well. It is
most likely to happen after a relocation finishes which cancels discard,
tears down the block group, etc.
Fix this fully by taking the lock around the list_del_init + clear_bit
so that the two are done atomically.
Fixes: 0657b20c5a76 ("btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The fs_info can be taken from the given block group, so there is no need
to pass it as an argument. Also rename the local variable from 'info' to
'fs_info' which is more widely used, more clear and to be more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The most trivial pattern for the auto freeing when the variable is
declared with the macro and the final btrfs_free_path() is removed.
There are almost none goto -> return conversions and there's no other
function cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We are considering the used bytes counter of a block group as the amount
to update the space info's reclaim bytes counter after relocating the
block group, but this value alone is often not enough. This is because we
may have a reserved extent (or more) and in that case its size is
reflected in the reserved counter of the block group - the size of the
extent is only transferred from the reserved counter to the used counter
of the block group when the delayed ref for the extent is run - typically
when committing the transaction (or when flushing delayed refs due to
ENOSPC on space reservation). Such call chain for data extents is:
btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head()
run_one_delayed_ref()
run_delayed_data_ref()
alloc_reserved_file_extent()
alloc_reserved_extent()
btrfs_update_block_group()
-> transfers the extent size from the reserved
counter to the used counter
For metadata extents:
btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head()
run_one_delayed_ref()
run_delayed_tree_ref()
alloc_reserved_tree_block()
alloc_reserved_extent()
btrfs_update_block_group()
-> transfers the extent size from the reserved
counter to the used counter
Since relocation flushes delalloc, waits for ordered extent completion
and commits the current transaction before doing the actual relocation
work, the correct amount of reclaimed space is therefore the sum of the
"used" and "reserved" counters of the block group before we call
btrfs_relocate_chunk() at btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work().
So fix this by taking the "reserved" counter into consideration.
Fixes: 243192b67649 ("btrfs: report reclaim stats in sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(), we are grabbing twice the used bytes counter
of the block group while not holding the block group's spinlock. This can
result in races, reported by KCSAN and similar tools, since a concurrent
task can be updating that counter while at btrfs_update_block_group().
So avoid these races by grabbing the counter in a critical section
delimited by the block group's spinlock after setting the block group to
RO mode. This also avoids using two different values of the counter in
case it changes in between each read. This silences KCSAN and is required
for the next patch in the series too.
Fixes: 243192b67649 ("btrfs: report reclaim stats in sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
At btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(), we are grabbing a block group's zone unusable
bytes while not under the protection of the block group's spinlock, so
this can trigger race reports from KCSAN (or similar tools) since that
field is typically updated while holding the lock, such as at
__btrfs_add_free_space_zoned() for example.
Fix this by grabbing the zone unusable bytes while we are still in the
critical section holding the block group's spinlock, which is right above
where we are currently grabbing it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The btrfs_key is defined as objectid/type/offset and the keys are also
printed like that. For better readability, update all key
initializations to match this order.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but
that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was
obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something
like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling
btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument.
These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra
overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Update fs/btrfs/block-group.c to use rb_find_add_cached().
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger L. Beckermeyer III <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since commit e1e577aafe41 ("btrfs: store fs_info in space_info"), we have
the fs_info in a space_info. So, we can drop fs_info argument from
btrfs_update_space_info_*. There is no behavior change.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Fix some confusing spelling errors that were currently identified,
the details are as follows:
block-group.c: 2800: uncompressible ==> incompressible
extent-tree.c: 3131: EXTEMT ==> EXTENT
extent_io.c: 3124: utlizing ==> utilizing
extent_map.c: 1323: ealier ==> earlier
extent_map.c: 1325: possiblity ==> possibility
fiemap.c: 189: emmitted ==> emitted
fiemap.c: 197: emmitted ==> emitted
fiemap.c: 203: emmitted ==> emitted
transaction.h: 36: trasaction ==> transaction
volumes.c: 5312: filesysmte ==> filesystem
zoned.c: 1977: trasnsaction ==> transaction
Signed-off-by: Shen Lichuan <shenlichuan@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When btrfs reserves an extent and does not use it (e.g, by an error), it
calls btrfs_free_reserved_extent() to free the reserved extent. In the
process, it calls btrfs_add_free_space() and then it accounts the region
bytes as block_group->zone_unusable.
However, it leaves the space_info->bytes_zone_unusable side not updated. As
a result, ENOSPC can happen while a space_info reservation succeeded. The
reservation is fine because the freed region is not added in
space_info->bytes_zone_unusable, leaving that space as "free". OTOH,
corresponding block group counts it as zone_unusable and its allocation
pointer is not rewound, we cannot allocate an extent from that block group.
That will also negate space_info's async/sync reclaim process, and cause an
ENOSPC error from the extent allocation process.
Fix that by returning the space to space_info->bytes_zone_unusable.
Ideally, since a bio is not submitted for this reserved region, we should
return the space to free space and rewind the allocation pointer. But, it
needs rework on extent allocation handling, so let it work in this way for
now.
Fixes: 169e0da91a21 ("btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Continue adding const to parameters. This is for clarity and minor
addition to safety. There are some minor effects, in the assembly code
and .ko measured on release config.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
again
When btrfs makes a block group read-only, it adds all free regions in the
block group to space_info->bytes_readonly. That free space excludes
reserved and pinned regions. OTOH, when btrfs makes the block group
read-write again, it moves all the unused regions into the block group's
zone_unusable. That unused region includes reserved and pinned regions.
As a result, it counts too much zone_unusable bytes.
Fortunately (or unfortunately), having erroneous zone_unusable does not
affect the calculation of space_info->bytes_readonly, because free
space (num_bytes in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro) calculation is done based on
the erroneous zone_unusable and it reduces the num_bytes just to cancel the
error.
This behavior can be easily discovered by adding a WARN_ON to check e.g,
"bg->pinned > 0" in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(), and running fstests test
case like btrfs/282.
Fix it by properly considering pinned and reserved in
btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(). Also, add a WARN_ON and introduce
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable() to catch a similar mistake.
Fixes: 169e0da91a21 ("btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The structure is internal so we should use struct btrfs_inode for that.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Periodic reclaim runs the risk of getting stuck in a state where it
keeps reclaiming the same block group over and over. This can happen if
1. reclaiming that block_group fails
2. reclaiming that block_group fails to move any extents into existing
block_groups and just allocates a fresh chunk and moves everything.
Currently, 1. is a very tight loop inside the reclaim worker. That is
critical for edge triggered reclaim or else we risk forgetting about a
reclaimable group. On the other hand, with level triggered reclaim we
can break out of that loop and get it later.
With that fixed, 2. applies to both failures and "successes" with no
progress. If we have done a periodic reclaim on a space_info and nothing
has changed in that space_info, there is not much point to trying again,
so don't, until enough space gets free, which we capture with a
heuristic of needing to net free 1 chunk.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We currently employ a edge-triggered block group reclaim strategy which
marks block groups for reclaim as they free down past a threshold.
With a dynamic threshold, this is worse than doing it in a
level-triggered fashion periodically. That is because the reclaim
itself happens periodically, so the threshold at that point in time is
what really matters, not the threshold at freeing time. If we mark the
reclaim in a big pass, then sort by usage and do reclaim, we also
benefit from a negative feedback loop preventing unnecessary reclaims as
we crunch through the "best" candidates.
Since this is quite a different model, it requires some additional
support. The edge triggered reclaim has a good heuristic for not
reclaiming fresh block groups, so we need to replace that with a typical
GC sweep mark which skips block groups that have seen an allocation
since the last sweep.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We can currently recover allocated block_groups by:
- explicitly starting balance operations
- "auto reclaim" via bg_reclaim_threshold
The latter works by checking against a fixed threshold on frees. If we
pass from above the threshold to below, relocation triggers and the
block group will get reclaimed by the cleaner thread (assuming it is
still eligible)
Picking a threshold is challenging. Too high, and you end up trying to
reclaim very full block_groups which is quite costly, and you don't do
reclaim on block_groups that don't get quite THAT full, but could still
be quite fragmented and stranding a lot of space. Too low, and you
similarly miss out on reclaim even if you badly need it to avoid running
out of unallocated space, if you have heavily fragmented block groups
living above the threshold.
No matter the threshold, it suffers from a workload that happens to
bounce around that threshold, which can introduce arbitrary amounts of
reclaim waste.
To improve this situation, introduce a dynamic threshold. The basic idea
behind this threshold is that it should be very lax when there is plenty
of unallocated space, and increasingly aggressive as we approach zero
unallocated space. To that end, it sets a target for unallocated space
(10 chunks) and then linearly increases the threshold as the amount of
space short of the target we are increases. The formula is:
(target - unalloc) / target
I tested this by running it on three interesting workloads:
1. bounce allocations around X% full.
2. fill up all the way and introduce full fragmentation.
3. write in a fragmented way until the filesystem is just about full.
1. and 2. attack the weaknesses of a fixed threshold; fixed either works
perfectly or fully falls apart, depending on the threshold. Dynamic
always handles these cases well.
3. attacks dynamic by checking whether it is too zealous to reclaim in
conditions with low unallocated and low unused. It tends to claw back
1GiB of unallocated fairly aggressively, but not much more. Early
versions of dynamic threshold struggled on this test.
Additional work could be done to intelligently ratchet up the urgency of
reclaim in very low unallocated conditions. Existing mechanisms are
already useless in that case anyway.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When evaluating various reclaim strategies/thresholds against each
other, it is useful to collect data about the amount of reclaim
happening. Expose a count, error count, and byte count via sysfs
per space_info.
Note that this is only for automatic reclaim, not manually invoked
balances or other codepaths that use "relocate_block_group"
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The function btrfs_block_group_root() is declared in disk-io.c; however,
all its callers are in block-group.c. Move it to the latter file and
declare it static.
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
reclaim
There is a potential parallel list adding for retrying in
btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work and adding to the unused list. Since the block
group is removed from the reclaim list and it is on a relocation work,
it can be added into the unused list in parallel. When that happens,
adding it to the reclaim list will corrupt the list head and trigger
list corruption like below.
Fix it by taking fs_info->unused_bgs_lock.
[177.504][T2585409] BTRFS error (device nullb1): error relocating ch= unk 2415919104
[177.514][T2585409] list_del corruption. next->prev should be ff1100= 0344b119c0, but was ff11000377e87c70. (next=3Dff110002390cd9c0)
[177.529][T2585409] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[177.537][T2585409] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:65!
[177.545][T2585409] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
[177.555][T2585409] CPU: 9 PID: 2585409 Comm: kworker/u128:2 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc5-kts #1
[177.568][T2585409] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-520P-WTR/X12SPW-TF, BIOS 1.2 02/14/2022
[177.579][T2585409] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work[btrfs]
[177.589][T2585409] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.624][T2585409] RSP: 0018:ff11000377e87a70 EFLAGS: 00010286
[177.633][T2585409] RAX: 000000000000006d RBX: ff11000344b119c0 RCX:0000000000000000
[177.644][T2585409] RDX: 000000000000006d RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI:ffe21c006efd0f40
[177.655][T2585409] RBP: ff110002e0509f78 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:ffe21c006efd0f08
[177.665][T2585409] R10: ff11000377e87847 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:ff110002390cd9c0
[177.676][T2585409] R13: ff11000344b119c0 R14: ff110002e0508000 R15:dffffc0000000000
[177.687][T2585409] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff11000fec880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[177.700][T2585409] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[177.709][T2585409] CR2: 00007f06bc7b1978 CR3: 0000001021e86005 CR4:0000000000771ef0
[177.720][T2585409] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:0000000000000000
[177.731][T2585409] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:0000000000000400
[177.742][T2585409] PKRU: 55555554
[177.748][T2585409] Call Trace:
[177.753][T2585409] <TASK>
[177.759][T2585409] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
[177.766][T2585409] ? die+0x2e/0x50
[177.772][T2585409] ? do_trap+0x1ea/0x2d0
[177.779][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.788][T2585409] ? do_error_trap+0xa3/0x160
[177.795][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.805][T2585409] ? handle_invalid_op+0x2c/0x40
[177.812][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.820][T2585409] ? exc_invalid_op+0x2d/0x40
[177.827][T2585409] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
[177.834][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.843][T2585409] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x3d9/0x14c0 [btrfs]
There is a similar retry_list code in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(), but it is
safe, AFAICS. Since the block group was in the unused list, the used bytes
should be 0 when it was added to the unused list. Then, it checks
block_group->{used,reserved,pinned} are still 0 under the
block_group->lock. So, they should be still eligible for the unused list,
not the reclaim list.
The reason it is safe there it's because because we're holding
space_info->groups_sem in write mode.
That means no other task can allocate from the block group, so while we
are at deleted_unused_bgs() it's not possible for other tasks to
allocate and deallocate extents from the block group, so it can't be
added to the unused list or the reclaim list by anyone else.
The bug can be reproduced by btrfs/166 after a few rounds. In practice
this can be hit when relocation cannot find more chunk space and ends
with ENOSPC.
Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Fixes: 4eb4e85c4f81 ("btrfs: retry block group reclaim without infinite loop")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If inc_block_group_ro systematically fails (e.g. due to ETXTBUSY from
swap) or btrfs_relocate_chunk systematically fails (from lack of
space), then this worker becomes an infinite loop.
At the very least, this strands the cleaner thread, but can also result
in hung tasks/RCU stalls on PREEMPT_NONE kernels and if the
reclaim_bgs_lock mutex is not contended.
I believe the best long term fix is to manage reclaim via work queue,
where we queue up a relocation on the triggering condition and re-queue
on failure. In the meantime, this is an easy fix to apply to avoid the
immediate pain.
Fixes: 7e2718099438 ("btrfs: reinsert BGs failed to reclaim")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be
used soon") changed the behaviour of deleting unused block-groups on zoned
filesystems. Starting with this commit, we're using
btrfs_space_info_used() to calculate the number of used bytes in a
space_info. But btrfs_space_info_used() also accounts
btrfs_space_info::bytes_zone_unusable as used bytes.
So if a block group is 100% zone_unusable it is skipped from the deletion
step.
In order not to skip fully zone_unusable block-groups, also check if the
block-group has bytes left that can be used on a zoned filesystem.
Fixes: f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_put_caching_control() is only used in block-group.c, so mark it
static.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Lijuan Li <lilijuan@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The unlikely case of lookup error in btrfs_remove_block_group() can be
handled properly, in its caller this would lead to a transaction abort.
We can't do anything else, a block group must have been loaded first.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
