| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed.
Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here.
Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
counter balanced.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
In most functions the driver data variable is called pc. Do the same in
the two remaining functions.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The .remove() function is only called after .probe() returned
successfully. In this case platform_set_drvdata() was called with a
non-NULL argument and so platfrom_get_drvdata() returns the same
non-NULL value.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
pwmchip_remove() always returns 0. Don't use the value to make it
possible to eventually change the function to return void. This is a
good thing as pwmchip_remove() is usually called from a remove function
(mostly for platform devices) and their return value is ignored by the
device core anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
To eventually get rid of all legacy drivers convert this driver to the
modern world implementing .apply(). This just pushes down a slightly
optimized variant of how legacy drivers are handled in the core.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
A struct berlin_pwm_chip * is now always called "bpc" (instead of "pwm"
which is usually used for struct pwm_device * or "chip" which is usually
used for struct pwm_chip *). The struct pwm_device * variables were
named "pwm_dev" or "pwm"; they are now always called "pwm".
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
To eventually get rid of all legacy drivers convert this driver to the
modern world implementing .apply(). This just pushes down a slightly
optimized variant of how legacy drivers are handled in the core.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
ecap_pwm_free is only called when a consumer releases the PWM (using
pwm_put() or pwm_free()). The consumer is expected to disable the PWM
before doing that. It's not clear if a warning about that is justified, but
if it is this is independent of the actual driver and can better be done in
the core. Also if there is a good reason it's wrong to disable the hardware
and so the call to pm_runtime_put_sync() should be dropped. Moreover there
is no matching pwm_runtime_get call and so the runtime usage counter might
become negative.
Fixes: 8e0cb05b3b75 ("pwm: pwm-tiecap: PWM driver support for ECAP APWM")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Since the PWM core uses device links (commit b2c200e3f2fd ("pwm: Add
consumer device link")) each consumer driver that requested the PWMs is
already gone. If they called pwm_put() (as they should) the
PWMF_REQUESTED bit is not set. If they failed (which is a bug) the
PWMF_REQUESTED bit might still be set, but the driver that cared is
gone, so nothing bad happens if the PWM chip goes away even if the
PWMF_REQUESTED is still present.
So the check can be dropped.
With this change pwmchip_remove() returns always 0, so lowlevel drivers
don't need to check the return code any more. Once all drivers dropped
this check this function can be changed to return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
With devm_pwmchip_add() we can drop pwmchip_remove() from the device
remove callback. The latter can then go away, too and as this is the
only user of platform_get_drvdata(), the respective call to
platform_set_drvdata() can go, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
With devm_pwmchip_add() we can drop pwmchip_remove() from the device
remove callback. The latter can then go away, too and as this is the
only user of platform_get_drvdata(), the respective call to
platform_set_drvdata() can go, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The .remove() callback disables clocks that were not enabled in
.probe(). So just probing and then unbinding the driver results in a clk
enable imbalance.
So just drop the call to disable the clocks. (Which BTW was also in the
wrong order because the call makes the PWM unfunctional and so should
have come only after pwmchip_remove()).
Fixes: 9f4c8f9607c3 ("pwm: imx: Add ipg clock operation")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
With devm_pwmchip_add() we can drop pwmchip_remove() from the device
remove callback. The latter can then go away, too and as this is the
only user of platform_get_drvdata(), the respective call to
platform_set_drvdata() can go, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
This potentially simplifies low-level PWM drivers.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Regmap operations can fail if the underlying subsystem is not working
properly (e.g. hogged I2C bus, etc.)
As this is useful information for the user, print an error message if it
happens.
Let probe fail if the first regmap_read or the first regmap_write fails.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Previously, the last used PWM channel could change the global prescale
setting, even if other channels are already in use.
Fix it by only allowing the first enabled PWM to change the global
chip-wide prescale setting. If there is more than one channel in use,
the prescale settings resulting from the chosen periods must match.
GPIOs do not count as enabled PWMs as they are not using the prescaler
and can't change it.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
If usage_power is set, the pca9685 driver will phase shift the
individual channels relative to their channel number. This improves EMI
because the enabled channels no longer turn on at the same time, while
still maintaining the configured duty cycle / power output.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
If usage_power is set, the PWM driver is only required to maintain
the power output but has more freedom regarding signal form.
If supported, the signal can be optimized, for example to
improve EMI by phase shifting individual channels.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Just using the previous callbacks to implment a similar procedure as the
legacy handling in the core.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clocks. The check for
pwmchip_remove()'s return value is dropped as this function returns
effectively always 0 and returning an error in a remove callback is
useless anyhow (as the device core ignores it and drops devm allocated
resources).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
With the original code a request for period = 65536000 ns and period =
32768000 ns yields the same register settings (which results in 32768000
ns) because the value for pwmc0 was miscalculated.
Also simplify using that fls(0) is 0.
Fixes: 721b595744f1 ("pwm: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti SoC PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
With the previous commit there is no need for the lowlevel driver any
more to specify it it uses two or three cells. So simplify accordingly.
The only non-trival change affects the pwm-rockchip driver: It used to only
support three cells if the hardware supports polarity. Now the default
number depends on the device tree which has to match hardware anyhow
(and if it doesn't the error is just a bit delayed as a PWM handle with
an inverted setting is catched when pwm_apply_state() is called).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
This allows to simplify all drivers that use three pwm-cells.
The only ugly side effect is that if a driver specified of_pwm_n_cells = 2
it suddenly supports device trees that use #pwm-cells = <3>. This however
isn't a bad thing because the driver doesn't need explicit support for
three cells as the core handles all the details. Also there is no such
in-tree driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Since the previous commit the latter function can do everything that the
former does. So simplify accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The two functions of_pwm_simple_xlate() and of_pwm_xlate_with_flags()
are quite similar. of_pwm_simple_xlate() only supports two-cell PWM
specifiers while of_pwm_xlate_with_flags() only supports PWM specifiers
with 3 or more cells. The latter can easily be modified to behave
identically to of_pwm_simple_xlate() for two-cell PWM specifiers. This
is implemented here and allows to drop of_pwm_simple_xlate() in the next
commit.
There is a small detail that is different now in the two-cell specifier
case in of_pwm_xlate_with_flags(): pwm->args.polarity is unconditionally
initialized to PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL in the latter. I didn't find a case
where this matters and doing that explicitly is the more robust
approach.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix up checkpatch warnings]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm
Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding:
"This adds support for the PWM controller found on Toshiba Visconti
SoCs and converts a couple of drivers to the atomic API.
There's also a bunch of cleanups and minor fixes across the board"
* tag 'pwm/for-5.13-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm: (35 commits)
pwm: Reword docs about pwm_apply_state()
pwm: atmel: Improve duty cycle calculation in .apply()
pwm: atmel: Fix duty cycle calculation in .get_state()
pwm: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti SoC PWM support
dt-bindings: pwm: Add bindings for Toshiba Visconti PWM Controller
arm64: dts: rockchip: Remove clock-names from PWM nodes
ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove clock-names from PWM nodes
dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: Add more compatible strings
dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-rockchip.txt to YAML
pwm: mediatek: Remove unused function
pwm: pca9685: Improve runtime PM behavior
pwm: pca9685: Support hardware readout
pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API
pwm: lpss: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
pwm: sti: Free resources only after pwmchip_remove()
pwm: sti: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
pwm: lpc3200: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
pwm: lpc18xx-sct: Free resources only after pwmchip_remove()
pwm: bcm-kona: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
pwm: bcm2835: Free resources only after pwmchip_remove()
...
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd
Pull MFD updates from Lee Jones:
"Core Framework:
- Add support for Software Nodes to MFD Core
- Remove support for Device Properties from MFD Core
- Use standard APIs in MFD Core
New Drivers:
- Add support for ROHM BD9576MUF and BD9573MUF PMICs
- Add support for Netronix Embedded Controller, PWM and RTC
- Add support for Actions Semi ATC260x PMICs and OnKey
New Device Support:
- Add support for DG1 PCIe Graphics Card to Intel PMT
- Add support for ROHM BD71815 PMIC to ROHM BD71828
- Add support for Tolino Shine 2 HD to Netronix Embedded Controller
- Add support for AX10 BMC Secure Updates to Intel M10 BMC
Removed Device Support:
- Remove Arizona Extcon support from MFD
- Remove ST-E AB8500 Power Supply code from MFD
- Remove AB3100 altogether
New Functionality:
- Add support for SMBus and I2C modes to Dialog DA9063
- Switch to using Software Nodes in Intel (various)
New/converted Device Tree bindings:
- rohm bd71815-pmic, rohm bd9576-pmic, netronix ntxec, actions
atc260x, ricoh rn5t618, qcom pm8xxx
- Fix-ups:
- Fix error handling/path; intel_pmt
- Simplify code; rohm-bd718x7, ab8500-core, intel-m10-bmc
- Trivial clean-ups (reordering, spelling); rohm-generic, rn5t618,
max8997
- Use correct data-type; db8500-prcmu
- Remove superfluous code; lp87565, intel_quark_i2c_gpi, lpc_sch, twl
- Use generic APIs/defines; lm3533-core, intel_quark_i2c_gpio
- Regmap related fix-ups; intel-m10-bmc, sec-core
- Reorder resource freeing during remove; intel_quark_i2c_gpio
- Make table indexing more robust; intel_quark_i2c_gpio
- Fix reference imbalances; arizona-irq
- Staticify and (un)constify things; arizona-spi, stmpe, ene-kb3930,
intel-lpss-acpi, intel-lpss-pci, atc260x-i2c, intel_quark_i2c_gpio
Bug Fixes:
- Fix incorrect (register) values; intel-m10-bmc
- Kconfig related fixes; ABX500_CORE
- Do not clear the Auto Reload Register; stm32-timers"
* tag 'mfd-next-5.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd: (84 commits)
mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Add support for MAX10 BMC Secure Updates
Revert "mfd: max8997: Add of_compatible to Extcon and Charger mfd_cell"
mfd: twl: Remove unused inline function twl4030charger_usb_en()
dt-bindings: mfd: Convert pm8xxx bindings to yaml
dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for pmk8350 rtc
i2c: designware: Get rid of legacy platform data
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Convert I²C to use software nodes
mfd: lpc_sch: Partially revert "Add support for Intel Quark X1000"
mfd: arizona: Fix rumtime PM imbalance on error
mfd: max8997: Replace 8998 with 8997
mfd: core: Use acpi_find_child_device() for child devices lookup
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Don't play dirty trick with const
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Enable MSI interrupt
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Reuse BAR definitions for MFD cell indexing
mfd: ntxec: Support for EC in Tolino Shine 2 HD
mfd: stm32-timers: Avoid clearing auto reload register
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Replace I²C speeds with descriptive definitions
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Remove unused struct device member
mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Unregister resources in reversed order
mfd: Kconfig: ABX500_CORE should depend on ARCH_U8500
...
|
|
In the calculation of the register value determining the duty cycle the
requested period is used instead of the actually implemented period which
results in suboptimal settings.
The following example assumes an input clock of 133333333 Hz on one of
the SoCs with 16 bit period.
When the following state is to be applied:
.period = 414727681
.duty_cycle = 652806
the following register values used to be calculated:
PRES = 10
CPRD = 54000
CDTY = 53916
which yields an actual duty cycle of a bit more than 645120 ns.
The setting
PRES = 10
CPRD = 54000
CDTY = 53915
however yields a duty of 652800 ns which is between the current result
and the requested value and so is a better approximation.
The reason for this error is that for the calculation of CDTY the
requested period was used instead of the actually implemented one.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The CDTY register contains the number of inactive cycles. .apply() does
this correctly, however .get_state() got this wrong.
Fixes: 651b510a74d4 ("pwm: atmel: Implement .get_state()")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Add driver for the PWM controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix up a couple of checkpatch warnings]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix the following clang warning:
drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:110:19: warning: unused function
'pwm_mediatek_readl' [-Wunused-function].
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The chip does not come out of POR in active state but in sleep state.
To be sure (in case the bootloader woke it up) we force it to sleep in
probe.
If runtime PM is disabled, we instead wake the chip in .probe and put it
to sleep in .remove.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Implement .get_state to read-out the current hardware state.
The hardware readout may return slightly different values than those
that were set in apply due to the limited range of possible prescale and
counter register values.
Also note that although the datasheet mentions 200 Hz as default
frequency when using the internal 25 MHz oscillator, the calculated
period from the default prescaler register setting of 30 is 5079040ns.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
previously experienced issues:
- The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
OFF registers were cleared in disable and the user was required to
call config to restore the duty cycle settings)
- If one sets a period resulting in the same prescale register value,
the sleep and write to the register is now skipped
- Previously, only the full ON bit was toggled in GPIO mode (and full
OFF cleared if set to high), which could result in both full OFF and
full ON not being set and on=0, off=0, which is not allowed according
to the datasheet
- The OFF registers were reset to 0 in probe, which could lead to the
forbidden on=0, off=0. Fixed by resetting to POR default (full OFF)
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clocks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clock.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing.) Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do, this
should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level driver.
So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clock.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clock.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Before pwmchip_remove() returns the PWM is expected to be functional. So
remove the pwmchip before disabling the clock.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
Adds support to control the PWM bus available in official Raspberry Pi
PoE HAT. Only RPi's co-processor has access to it, so commands have to
be sent through RPi's firmware mailbox interface.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
pwmchip_add() only calls pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and nothing else. All
other users of pwmchip_add_with_polarity() are gone. So drop
pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and move the code instead to pwmchip_add().
The initial assignment to pwm->state.polarity is dropped. In every correct
usage of the PWM API this value is overwritten later anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The only side effect of this change is that pwm->state.polarity is
initialized to PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL instead of PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED.
However all other members of pwm->state are uninitialized and consumers
are expected to provide the right polarity (either by setting it explicitly
or by using a helper like pwm_init_state() that overwrites .polarity
anyhow with a value independent of the initial value).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
The only side effect of this change is that pwm->state.polarity is
initialized to PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL instead of PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED.
However all other members of pwm->state are uninitialized and consumers
are expected to provide the right polarity (either by setting it explicitly
or by using a helper like pwm_init_state() that overwrites .polarity
anyhow with a value independent of the initial value).
The eventual goal is to remove pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and so simplify
the data flow in the PWM core.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
