| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Depmod reports a cyclic dependency between modules sparx5-switch.ko and
lan969x-switch.ko:
depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: lan969x_switch -> sparx5_switch -> lan969x_switch
depmod: ERROR: Found 2 modules in dependency cycles!
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modinst:132: depmod] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2
This makes sense, as they both require symbols from each other.
Fix this by compiling lan969x support into the sparx5-switch.ko module.
In order to do this, in a sensible way, we move the lan969x/ dir into
the sparx5/ dir and do some code cleanup of code that is no longer
required.
After this patch, depmod will no longer complain, as lan969x support is
compiled into the sparx5-swicth.ko module, and can no longer be compiled
as a standalone module.
Fixes: 98a01119608d ("net: sparx5: add compatible string for lan969x")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Use the is_sparx5() macro (introduced in earlier series [1]), in places
where we need to handle things a bit differently on lan969x.
These places are:
- in sparx5_dsm_calendar_update() we need to switch the calendar
from a to b on lan969x.
- in sparx5_start() we need to make sure the HSCH_SYS_CLK_PER
register is only touched on Sparx5.
- in sparx5_start() we need to disable VCAP and FDMA for lan969x
(will come in later series).
- in sparx5_mirror_port_get() we must make sure the
ANA_AC_PROBE_PORT_CFG1 register is only read on Sparx5.
- sparx5_netdev.c and sparx5_packet.c we need to use different IFH
(Internal Frame Header) offsets for lan969x.
- in sparx5_port_fifo_sz() we must bail out on lan969x.
- in sparx5_port_config_low_set() we must configure the phase
detection registers.
- in sparx5_port_config() and sparx5_port_init() we must do some
additional configuration of the port devices.
- in sparx5_dwrr_conf_set() we must derive the scheduling layer
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241004-b4-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-v2-8-d3290f581663@microchip.com/
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-12-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Lan969x has support for RedBox / HSR / PRP (not implemented yet). In
order to accommodate for this in the future, we need to give lan969x it's
own function for calculating the DSM calendar.
The function calculates the calendar for each taxi bus. The calendar is
used for bandwidth allocation towards the ports attached to the taxi
bus. A calendar configuration consists of up-to 64 slots, which may be
allocated to ports or left unused. Each slot accounts for 1 clock cycle.
Also expose sparx5_cal_speed_to_value(), sparx5_get_port_cal_speed,
sparx5_cal_bw and SPX5_DSM_CAL_EMPTY for use by lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-11-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, use spx5_rmw() for enabling the update of
the calendar. This is required to not overwrite the DSM_TAXI_CAL_CFG
register, as an additional write will be added before this one, in a
subsequent patch.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-2-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, add lan969x targets to
sparx5_target_chiptype and set the core clock frequency for these
throughout. Lan969x only supports a core clock frequency of 328MHz.
Also, set the policer update internal (pol_upd_int) matching the 328 MHz
frequency of the lan969x targets.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-1-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Internal ports and PGID's are both defined relative to the number of
front ports on Sparx5. This will not work on lan969x. Instead make them
offsets to the number of front ports and add two helpers to retrieve
them. Use the helpers throughout.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
We dont want to ops out each time a function needs to do some platform
specifics. In particular we have a few places, where it would be
convenient to just branch out on the platform type. Add the function
is_sparx5() and, initially, use it for:
- register writes that should only be done on Sparx5 (QSYS_CAL_CTRL,
CLKGEN_LCPLL1_CORE_CLK).
- function calls that should only be done on Sparx5
(ethtool_op_get_ts_info())
- register writes that are chip-exclusive (MASK_CFG1/2, PGID_CFG1/2,
these are replicated for n_ports >32 on Sparx5).
The is_sparx5() function simply checks the target chip type, to
determine if this is a Sparx5 SKU or not.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The DSM (Disassembler) calendar grants each port access to internal
busses. The configuration of the calendar is done differently on Sparx5
and lan969x. Therefore ops out the function that calculates the
calendar.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Now that we have indentified all the chip constants, update the use of
them where a symbol is already defined for the constant.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
This configures the Sparx5 calendars according to the bandwidth
requested in the Device Tree nodes.
It also checks if the total requested bandwidth is within the
specs of the detected Sparx5 models limits.
Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
