Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Add internal loopback support for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the default loopback
mode is MAC level loopback, the MAC Tx data is looped back onto the Rx.
The MAC interface runs at a fixed 1:8 ratio of NETC clock in MAC-level
loopback mode, with no dependency on Tx clock.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506080735.3444381-15-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Since the offsets of the VLAN hash filter registers of ENETC v4 are
different from ENETC v1. Therefore, enetc_set_si_vlan_ht_filter() is
added to set the correct VLAN hash filter based on the SI ID and ENETC
revision, so that ENETC v4 PF driver can reuse enetc_vlan_rx_add_vid()
and enetc_vlan_rx_del_vid(). In addition, the VLAN promiscuous mode will
be enabled if VLAN filtering is disabled, which means that PF qualifies
for reception of all VLAN tags.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506080735.3444381-14-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The VLAN hash filters of ENETC v1 and v4 are basically the same, the only
difference is that the offset of the VLAN hash filter registers has been
changed in ENETC v4. So some functions like enetc_vlan_rx_add_vid() and
enetc_vlan_rx_del_vid() only need to be slightly modified to be reused
by ENETC v4. Currently, we just move these functions from enetc_pf.c to
enetc_pf_common.c. Appropriate modifications will be made for ENETC4 in
a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506080735.3444381-13-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Receive side scaling (RSS) is a network driver technology that enables
the efficient distribution of network receive processing across multiple
CPUs in multiprocessor systems. Therefore, it is better to enable RSS by
default so that the CPU load can be balanced and network performance can
be improved when then network is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506080735.3444381-11-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Compared with LS1028A, there are two main differences: first, i.MX95
ENETC uses NTMP 2.0 to manage the RSS table, and second, the offset
of the RSS Key registers is different. Some modifications have been
made in the previous patches based on these differences to ensure that
the relevant interfaces are compatible with i.MX95. So it's time to
add RSS support to i.MX95 ENETC PF.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506080735.3444381-9-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Since the offset of the RSS key registers of i.MX95 ENETC is different
from that of LS1028A, so add enetc_get_rss_key_base() to get the base
offset for the different chips, so that enetc_set_rss_key() can be
reused for this trivial thing.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250506080735.3444381-8-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Set NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 bit of hw_features and features because i.MX95
enetc and LS1028A driver implements UDP segmentation.
- i.MX95 ENETC supports UDP segmentation via LSO.
- LS1028A ENETC supports UDP segmentation since the commit 3d5b459ba0e3
("net: tso: add UDP segmentation support").
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219054755.1615626-5-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
ENETC rev 4.1 supports large send offload (LSO), segmenting large TCP
and UDP transmit units into multiple Ethernet frames. To support LSO,
software needs to fill some auxiliary information in Tx BD, such as LSO
header length, frame length, LSO maximum segment size, etc.
At 1Gbps link rate, TCP segmentation was tested using iperf3, and the
CPU performance before and after applying the patch was compared through
the top command. It can be seen that LSO saves a significant amount of
CPU cycles compared to software TSO.
Before applying the patch:
%Cpu(s): 0.1 us, 4.1 sy, 0.0 ni, 85.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.5 hi, 9.7 si
After applying the patch:
%Cpu(s): 0.1 us, 2.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 94.5 id, 0.0 wa, 0.4 hi, 2.6 si
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219054755.1615626-4-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The max chained Tx BDs of latest ENETC (i.MX95 ENETC, rev 4.1) has been
increased to 63, but since the range of MAX_SKB_FRAGS is 17~45, so for
i.MX95 ENETC and later revision, it is better to set ENETC4_MAX_SKB_FRAGS
to MAX_SKB_FRAGS.
In addition, add max_frags in struct enetc_drvdata to indicate the max
chained BDs supported by device. Because the max number of chained BDs
supported by LS1028A and i.MX95 ENETC is different.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219054755.1615626-3-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In addition to supporting Rx checksum offload, i.MX95 ENETC also supports
Tx checksum offload. The transmit checksum offload is implemented through
the Tx BD. To support Tx checksum offload, software needs to fill some
auxiliary information in Tx BD, such as IP version, IP header offset and
size, whether L4 is UDP or TCP, etc.
Same as Rx checksum offload, Tx checksum offload capability isn't defined
in register, so tx_csum bit is added to struct enetc_drvdata to indicate
whether the device supports Tx checksum offload.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241219054755.1615626-2-wei.fang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The i.MX95 ENETC has been upgraded to revision 4.1, which is different
from the LS1028A ENETC (revision 1.0) except for the SI part. Therefore,
the fsl-enetc driver is incompatible with i.MX95 ENETC PF. So add new
nxp-enetc4 driver to support i.MX95 ENETC PF, and this driver will be
used to support the ENETC PF with major revision 4 for other SoCs in the
future.
Currently, the nxp-enetc4 driver only supports basic transmission feature
for i.MX95 ENETC PF, the more basic and advanced features will be added
in the subsequent patches. In addition, PCS support has not been added
yet, so 10G ENETC (ENETC instance 2) is not supported now.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Compile enetc_pf_common.c as a standalone module to allow shared usage
between ENETC v1 and v4 PF drivers. Add struct enetc_pf_ops to register
different hardware operation interfaces for both ENETC v1 and v4 PF
drivers.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The ENETC PF driver of LS1028A (rev 1.0) is incompatible with the version
used on the i.MX95 platform (rev 4.1), except for the station interface
(SI) part. To reduce code redundancy and prepare for a new driver for rev
4.1 and later, extract shared interfaces from enetc_pf.c and move them to
enetc_pf_common.c. This refactoring lays the groundwork for compiling
enetc_pf_common.c into a shared driver for both platforms' PF drivers.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|