| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add support to allow optional-counters binding to a QP, whereas when
a bind operation is requested depending on the counter optional-counter
binding state the driver will determine if to also add optional-counters
to this QP binding.
The optional-counter binding is done by simply adding a steering
rule for the specific optional-counter condition with the additional
match over that QP number.
Note that optional-counters per QP rules are handled on an earlier prio
than per device counters, and per device counter correctness is maintained
by core whereas it is responsible to sum active counters when checking device
counter and to add them to history count when they are deallocated.
Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2cad1b891a6641ae61fe8d92f867e1059121813a.1741875070.git.leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
|
|
Change rdma_counter allocation to use rdma_zalloc_drv_obj() instead of,
explicitly allocating at core, in order to be contained inside driver
specific structures.
Adjust all drivers that use it to have their containing structure, and
add driver specific initialization operation.
This change is needed to allow upcoming patches to implement
optional-counters binding whereas inside each driver specific counter
struct his bound optional-counters will be maintained.
Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/a5a484f421fc2e5595158e61a354fba43272b02d.1741875070.git.leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
|
|
Current code uses many different types when dealing with a port of a RDMA
device: u8, unsigned int and u32. Switch to u32 to clean up the logic.
This allows us to make (at least) the core view consistent and use the
same type. Unfortunately not all places can be converted. Many uverbs
functions expect port to be u8 so keep those places in order not to break
UAPIs. HW/Spec defined values must also not be changed.
With the switch to u32 we now can support devices with more than 255
ports. U32_MAX is reserved to make control logic a bit easier to deal
with. As a device with U32_MAX ports probably isn't going to happen any
time soon this seems like a non issue.
When a device with more than 255 ports is created uverbs will report the
RDMA device as having 255 ports as this is the max currently supported.
The verbs interface is not changed yet because the IBTA spec limits the
port size in too many places to be u8 and all applications that relies in
verbs won't be able to cope with this change. At this stage, we are
extending the interfaces that are using vendor channel solely
Once the limitation is lifted mlx5 in switchdev mode will be able to have
thousands of SFs created by the device. As the only instance of an RDMA
device that reports more than 255 ports will be a representor device and
it exposes itself as a RAW Ethernet only device CM/MAD/IPoIB and other
ULPs aren't effected by this change and their sysfs/interfaces that are
exposes to userspace can remain unchanged.
While here cleanup some alignment issues and remove unneeded sanity
checks (mainly in rdmavt),
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210301070420.439400-1-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
|
|
There are number of counters types supported in mlx5_ib: HW counters,
congestion counters, Q-counters and flow counters. Almost all supporting
code was placed in main.c that made almost impossible to maintain the code
anymore. Let's create separate code namespace for the counters to easy
future generalization effort.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702081809.423482-4-leon@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
|
