summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/hid/bpf/hid_bpf_dispatch.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-06-27HID: bpf: prevent infinite recursions with hid_hw_raw_requests hooksBenjamin Tissoires
When we attach a sleepable hook to hid_hw_raw_requests, we can (and in many cases should) call ourself hid_bpf_raw_request(), to actually fetch data from the device itself. However, this means that we might enter an infinite loop between hid_hw_raw_requests hooks and hid_bpf_hw_request() call. To prevent that, if a hid_bpf_hw_request() call is emitted, we prevent any new call of this kfunc by storing the information in the context. This way we can always trace/monitor/filter the incoming bpf requests, while preventing those loops to happen. I don't think exposing "from_bpf" is very interesting because while writing such a bpf program, you need to match at least the report number and/or the source of the call. So a blind "if there is a hid_hw_raw_request() call, I'm emitting another one" makes no real sense. Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240626-hid_hw_req_bpf-v2-5-cfd60fb6c79f@kernel.org Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-06-14HID: bpf: remove tracing HID-BPF capabilityBenjamin Tissoires
We can now rely on struct_ops as we cleared the users in-tree. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-8-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-06-14HID: bpf: implement HID-BPF through bpf_struct_opsBenjamin Tissoires
We do this implementation in several steps to not have the CI failing: - first (this patch), we add struct_ops while keeping the existing infra available - then we change the selftests, the examples and the existing in-tree HID-BPF programs - then we remove the existing trace points making old HID-BPF obsolete There are a few advantages of struct_ops over tracing: - compatibility with sleepable programs (for hid_hw_raw_request() in a later patch) - a lot simpler in the kernel: it's a simple rcu protected list - we can add more parameters to the function called without much trouble - the "attach" is now generic through BPF-core: the caller just needs to set hid_id and flags before calling __load(). - all the BPF tough part is not handled in BPF-core through generic processing - hid_bpf_ctx is now only writable where it needs be Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240608-hid_bpf_struct_ops-v3-3-6ac6ade58329@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2024-01-31HID: bpf: remove double fdget()Benjamin Tissoires
When the kfunc hid_bpf_attach_prog() is called, we called twice fdget(): one for fetching the type of the bpf program, and one for actually attaching the program to the device. The problem is that between those two calls, we have no guarantees that the prog_fd is still the same file descriptor for the given program. Solve this by calling bpf_prog_get() earlier, and use this to fetch the program type. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAO-hwJJ8vh8JD3-P43L-_CLNmPx0hWj44aom0O838vfP4=_1CA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: f5c27da4e3c8 ("HID: initial BPF implementation") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124-b4-hid-bpf-fixes-v2-1-052520b1e5e6@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
2023-01-18HID: bpf: clean up entrypointBenjamin Tissoires
We don't need to watch for calls on bpf_prog_put_deferred(), so remove that from the entrypoints.bpf.c file. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2022-11-15HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptorBenjamin Tissoires
Add a new tracepoint hid_bpf_rdesc_fixup() so we can trigger a report descriptor fixup in the bpf world. Whenever the program gets attached/detached, the device is reconnected meaning that userspace will see it disappearing and reappearing with the new report descriptor. Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2022-11-15HID: bpf jmp table: simplify the logic of cleaning up programsBenjamin Tissoires
Kind of a hack, but works for now: Instead of listening for any close of eBPF program, we now decrement the refcount when we insert it in our internal map of fd progs. This is safe to do because: - we listen to any call of destructor of programs - when a program is being destroyed, we disable it by removing it from any RCU list used by any HID device (so it will never be called) - we then trigger a job to cleanup the prog fd map, but we overwrite the removal of the elements to not do anything on the programs, just remove the allocated space This is better than previously because we can remove the map of known programs and their usage count. We now rely on the refcount of bpf, which has greater chances of being accurate. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2022-11-15HID: initial BPF implementationBenjamin Tissoires
Declare an entry point that can use fmod_ret BPF programs, and also an API to access and change the incoming data. A simpler implementation would consist in just calling hid_bpf_device_event() for any incoming event and let users deal with the fact that they will be called for any event of any device. The goal of HID-BPF is to partially replace drivers, so this situation can be problematic because we might have programs which will step on each other toes. For that, we add a new API hid_bpf_attach_prog() that can be called from a syscall and we manually deal with a jump table in hid-bpf. Whenever we add a program to the jump table (in other words, when we attach a program to a HID device), we keep the number of time we added this program in the jump table so we can release it whenever there are no other users. HID devices have an RCU protected list of available programs in the jump table, and those programs are called one after the other thanks to bpf_tail_call(). To achieve the detection of users losing their fds on the programs we attached, we add 2 tracing facilities on bpf_prog_release() (for when a fd is closed) and bpf_free_inode() (for when a pinned program gets unpinned). Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>