| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The default behavior if the LMEMBAR doesn't match the maximum possible
size is to try to resize it. However the user might want to keep, even
for testing the behavior with small BAR, whatever size was set via
sysfs. Change the module parameter to int and check for negative value.
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250409-bar-resize-param-v1-1-75bf4df38aa0@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
xe_force_wake_get() now returns the reference count-incremented domain
mask. If it fails for individual domains, the return value will always
be 0. However, for XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL, it may return a non-zero value even
in the event of failure. Update the return handling of xe_force_wake_get()
to reflect this behavior, and ensure that the return value is passed as
input to xe_force_wake_put().
v3
- return xe_wakeref_t instead of int in xe_force_wake_get()
- xe_force_wake_put() error doesn't need to be escalated/considered as
probing error. It internally WARNS on domain ack failure.
v5
- return unsigned int from xe_force_wake_get()
v7
- Fix commit message
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241014075601.2324382-24-himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Spec says SW is expected to round up to the nearest 128K, if not already
aligned for the CC unit view of CCS. We are seeing the assert sometimes
pop on BMG to tell us that there is a hole between GSM and CCS, as well
as popping other asserts with having a vram size with strange alignment,
which is likely caused by misaligned offset here.
v2 (Shuicheng):
- Do the round_up() on final SW address.
BSpec: 68023
Fixes: b5c2ca0372dc ("drm/xe/xe2hpg: Determine flat ccs offset for vram")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Cc: Akshata Jahagirdar <akshata.jahagirdar@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.10+
Reviewed-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shuicheng Lin <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240916084911.13119-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
|
|
Stop using GT pointers for register access. Note that MIRROR_FUSE3 is a
GT register and is accessed via gt->mmio, whereas GSMBASE is an sgunit
register so it is accessed via tile->mmio.
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240910234719.3335472-58-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
|
|
VF drivers will obtain VRAM configuration from the GuC as part of
the VF self config. Use that configuration instead of trying to
read inaccessible registers.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240530133527.1328-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|
|
There is no point in mixing register access and VRAM code in the
same file. Move and rename the VRAM probe function to a new file
(there are no other changes other then new simple kernel-doc).
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240530133527.1328-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
|
