summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_pcode.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-06-23drm/xe/compat: remove old pcode compat interfaceJani Nikula
With display code using the struct drm_device based pcode interface, we can drop the old pcode compat interface. We can also drop the __compat_uncore_to_tile() helper from intel_uncore.h compat header. Turns out a couple of headers depended on the intel_uncore.h include via intel_pcode.h. Fix them. Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/948016a031dcb2acef0c97071aac09fa49613e07.1750678991.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-06-23drm/i915/pcode: drop fast wait from snb_pcode_write_timeout()Jani Nikula
Only use the ms granularity wait in snb_pcode_write_timeout(), primarily to better align with the xe driver, which also only has the millisecond wait. Use an arbitrary 250 us fast wait before the specified ms wait, and have snb_pcode_write() default to 1 ms. This means snb_pcode_write() and snb_pcode_write_timeout() will always be sleeping functions. There should not be any atomic users for pcode writes though, and any display code using pcode via xe has already been non-atomic. The uncore wait will do a might_sleep() annotation that should catch any problems. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ba86280f53cea2d020308db35f1ecbd615d07d8a.1750678991.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2024-08-30drm/xe/pcode: Treat pcode as per-tile rather than per-GTMatt Roper
There's only one instance of the pcode per tile, and for GT-related accesses both the primary and media GT share the same register interface. Since Xe was using per-GT locking, the pcode mutex wasn't actually protecting everything that it should since concurrent accesses related to a tile's primary GT and media GT were possible. Fixes: dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs") Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240829220619.789159-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
2023-12-21drm/xe/display: Implement display supportMaarten Lankhorst
As for display, the intent is to share the display code with the i915 driver so that there is maximum reuse there. We do this by recompiling i915/display code twice. Now that i915 has been adapted to support the Xe build, we can add the xe/display support. This initial work is a collaboration of many people and unfortunately this squashed patch won't fully honor the proper credits. But let's try to add a few from the squashed patches: Co-developed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>