| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
flex-array
Zero-length arrays are deprecated[1] and are being replaced with
flexible array members in support of the ongoing efforts to tighten the
FORTIFY_SOURCE routines on memcpy(), correctly instrument array indexing
with UBSAN_BOUNDS, and to globally enable -fstrict-flex-arrays=3.
Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member.
This results in no differences in binary output.
[1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Gourav Samaiya <gsamaiya@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230103234835.never.378-kees@kernel.org
|
|
v2. fixup for ga103 early merge
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gourav Samaiya <gsamaiya@nvidia.com>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
no longer be used[2].
This code was transformed with the help of Coccinelle:
(next-20220214$ spatch --jobs $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) --sp-file script.cocci --include-headers --dir . > output.patch)
@@
identifier S, member, array;
type T1, T2;
@@
struct S {
...
T1 member;
T2 array[
- 0
];
};
UAPI and wireless changes were intentionally excluded from this patch
and will be sent out separately.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
We perform memory allocations long before we hit the code in SECBOOT that
would unlock the VPR, which could potentially result in memory allocation
within the locked region.
Run the scrubber binary right after VRAM init to ensure we don't.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
