summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-07-09x86/microcode: Move away from using a fake platform deviceGreg Kroah-Hartman
Downloading firmware needs a device to hang off of, and so a platform device seemed like the simplest way to do this. Now that we have a faux device interface, use that instead as this "microcode device" is not anything resembling a platform device at all. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/2025070121-omission-small-9308@gregkh
2025-05-15x86/cpuid: Rename have_cpuid_p() to cpuid_feature()Ahmed S. Darwish
In order to let all the APIs under <cpuid/api.h> have a shared "cpuid_" namespace, rename have_cpuid_p() to cpuid_feature(). Adjust all call-sites accordingly. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Cc: x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250508150240.172915-4-darwi@linutronix.de
2025-05-13Merge branch 'x86/msr' into x86/core, to resolve conflictsIngo Molnar
Conflicts: arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c Semantic conflict: arch/x86/include/asm/sev-internal.h Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2025-05-13Merge branch 'x86/microcode' into x86/core, to merge dependent commitsIngo Molnar
Prepare to resolve conflicts with an upstream series of fixes that conflict with pending x86 changes: 6f5bf947bab0 Merge tag 'its-for-linus-20250509' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2025-05-05x86/microcode: Consolidate the loader enablement checkingBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Consolidate the whole logic which determines whether the microcode loader should be enabled or not into a single function and call it everywhere. Well, almost everywhere - not in mk_early_pgtbl_32() because there the kernel is running without paging enabled and checking dis_ucode_ldr et al would require physical addresses and uglification of the code. But since this is 32-bit, the easier thing to do is to simply map the initrd unconditionally especially since that mapping is getting removed later anyway by zap_early_initrd_mapping() and avoid the uglification. In doing so, address the issue of old 486er machines without CPUID support, not booting current kernels. [ mingo: Fix no previous prototype for ‘microcode_loader_disabled’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] ] Fixes: 4c585af7180c1 ("x86/boot/32: Temporarily map initrd for microcode loading") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CANpbe9Wm3z8fy9HbgS8cuhoj0TREYEEkBipDuhgkWFvqX0UoVQ@mail.gmail.com
2025-05-02x86/msr: Add explicit includes of <asm/msr.h>Xin Li (Intel)
For historic reasons there are some TSC-related functions in the <asm/msr.h> header, even though there's an <asm/tsc.h> header. To facilitate the relocation of rdtsc{,_ordered}() from <asm/msr.h> to <asm/tsc.h> and to eventually eliminate the inclusion of <asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>, add an explicit <asm/msr.h> dependency to the source files that reference definitions from <asm/msr.h>. [ mingo: Clarified the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250501054241.1245648-1-xin@zytor.com
2025-04-30x86/microcode/AMD: Do not return error when microcode update is not necessaryAnnie Li
After 6f059e634dcd("x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic"), if the load is up-to-date, the AMD side returns UCODE_OK which leads to load_late_locked() returning -EBADFD. Handle UCODE_OK in the switch case to avoid this error. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Fixes: 6f059e634dcd ("x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logic") Signed-off-by: Annie Li <jiayanli@google.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250430053424.77438-1-jiayanli@google.com
2024-05-06x86/microcode: Remove unused struct cpu_info_ctxDr. David Alan Gilbert
This looks unused since 2071c0aeda22 ("x86/microcode: Simplify init path even more") Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506004300.770564-1-linux@treblig.org
2023-11-21x86/microcode: Rework early revisions reportingBorislav Petkov (AMD)
The AMD side of the loader issues the microcode revision for each logical thread on the system, which can become really noisy on huge machines. And doing that doesn't make a whole lot of sense - the microcode revision is already in /proc/cpuinfo. So in case one is interested in the theoretical support of mixed silicon steppings on AMD, one can check there. What is also missing on the AMD side - something which people have requested before - is showing the microcode revision the CPU had *before* the early update. So abstract that up in the main code and have the BSP on each vendor provide those revision numbers. Then, dump them only once on driver init. On Intel, do not dump the patch date - it is not needed. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wg=%2B8rceshMkB4VnKxmRccVLtBLPBawnewZuuqyx5U=3A@mail.gmail.com
2023-11-21x86/microcode: Remove the driver announcement and versionBorislav Petkov (AMD)
First of all, the print is useless. The driver will either load and say which microcode revision the machine has or issue an error. Then, the version number is meaningless and actively confusing, as Yazen mentioned recently: when a subset of patches are backported to a distro kernel, one can't assume the driver version is the same as the upstream one. And besides, the version number of the loader hasn't been used and incremented for a long time. So drop it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231115210212.9981-2-bp@alien8.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Prepare for minimal revision checkThomas Gleixner
Applying microcode late can be fatal for the running kernel when the update changes functionality which is in use already in a non-compatible way, e.g. by removing a CPUID bit. There is no way for admins which do not have access to the vendors deep technical support to decide whether late loading of such a microcode is safe or not. Intel has added a new field to the microcode header which tells the minimal microcode revision which is required to be active in the CPU in order to be safe. Provide infrastructure for handling this in the core code and a command line switch which allows to enforce it. If the update is considered safe the kernel is not tainted and the annoying warning message not emitted. If it's enforced and the currently loaded microcode revision is not safe for late loading then the load is aborted. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211724.079611170@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Handle "offline" CPUs correctlyThomas Gleixner
Offline CPUs need to be parked in a safe loop when microcode update is in progress on the primary CPU. Currently, offline CPUs are parked in mwait_play_dead(), and for Intel CPUs, its not a safe instruction, because the MWAIT instruction can be patched in the new microcode update that can cause instability. - Add a new microcode state 'UCODE_OFFLINE' to report status on per-CPU basis. - Force NMI on the offline CPUs. Wake up offline CPUs while the update is in progress and then return them back to mwait_play_dead() after microcode update is complete. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.660850472@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Protect against instrumentationThomas Gleixner
The wait for control loop in which the siblings are waiting for the microcode update on the primary thread must be protected against instrumentation as instrumentation can end up in #INT3, #DB or #PF, which then returns with IRET. That IRET reenables NMI which is the opposite of what the NMI rendezvous is trying to achieve. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.545969323@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Rendezvous and load in NMIThomas Gleixner
stop_machine() does not prevent the spin-waiting sibling from handling an NMI, which is obviously violating the whole concept of rendezvous. Implement a static branch right in the beginning of the NMI handler which is nopped out except when enabled by the late loading mechanism. The late loader enables the static branch before stop_machine() is invoked. Each CPU has an nmi_enable in its control structure which indicates whether the CPU should go into the update routine. This is required to bridge the gap between enabling the branch and actually being at the point where it is required to enter the loader wait loop. Each CPU which arrives in the stopper thread function sets that flag and issues a self NMI right after that. If the NMI function sees the flag clear, it returns. If it's set it clears the flag and enters the rendezvous. This is safe against a real NMI which hits in between setting the flag and sending the NMI to itself. The real NMI will be swallowed by the microcode update and the self NMI will then let stuff continue. Otherwise this would end up with a spurious NMI. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.489900814@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Replace the all-in-one rendevous handlerThomas Gleixner
with a new handler which just separates the control flow of primary and secondary CPUs. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.433704135@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Provide new control functionsThomas Gleixner
The current all in one code is unreadable and really not suited for adding future features like uniform loading with package or system scope. Provide a set of new control functions which split the handling of the primary and secondary CPUs. These will replace the current rendezvous all in one function in the next step. This is intentionally a separate change because diff makes an complete unreadable mess otherwise. So the flow separates the primary and the secondary CPUs into their own functions which use the control field in the per CPU ucode_ctrl struct. primary() secondary() wait_for_all() wait_for_all() apply_ucode() wait_for_release() release() apply_ucode() Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.377922731@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Add per CPU control fieldThomas Gleixner
Add a per CPU control field to ucode_ctrl and define constants for it which are going to be used to control the loading state machine. In theory this could be a global control field, but a global control does not cover the following case: 15 primary CPUs load microcode successfully 1 primary CPU fails and returns with an error code With global control the sibling of the failed CPU would either try again or the whole operation would be aborted with the consequence that the 15 siblings do not invoke the apply path and end up with inconsistent software state. The result in dmesg would be inconsistent too. There are two additional fields added and initialized: ctrl_cpu and secondaries. ctrl_cpu is the CPU number of the primary thread for now, but with the upcoming uniform loading at package or system scope this will be one CPU per package or just one CPU. Secondaries hands the control CPU a CPU mask which will be required to release the secondary CPUs out of the wait loop. Preparatory change for implementing a properly split control flow for primary and secondary CPUs. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.319959519@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Add per CPU result stateThomas Gleixner
The microcode rendezvous is purely acting on global state, which does not allow to analyze fails in a coherent way. Introduce per CPU state where the results are written into, which allows to analyze the return codes of the individual CPUs. Initialize the state when walking the cpu_present_mask in the online check to avoid another for_each_cpu() loop. Enhance the result print out with that. The structure is intentionally named ucode_ctrl as it will gain control fields in subsequent changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.632681010@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus()Thomas Gleixner
The code is too complicated for no reason: - The return value is pointless as this is a strict boolean. - It's way simpler to count down from num_online_cpus() and check for zero. - The timeout argument is pointless as this is always one second. - Touching the NMI watchdog every 100ns does not make any sense, neither does checking every 100ns. This is really not a hotpath operation. Preload the atomic counter with the number of online CPUs and simplify the whole timeout logic. Delay for one microsecond and touch the NMI watchdog once per millisecond. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.204251527@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logicThomas Gleixner
reload_store() is way too complicated. Split the inner workings out and make the following enhancements: - Taint the kernel only when the microcode was actually updated. If. e.g. the rendezvous fails, then nothing happened and there is no reason for tainting. - Return useful error codes Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.145048840@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctlyThomas Gleixner
On CPUs where microcode loading is not NMI-safe the SMT siblings which are parked in one of the play_dead() variants still react to NMIs. So if an NMI hits while the primary thread updates the microcode the resulting behaviour is undefined. The default play_dead() implementation on modern CPUs is using MWAIT which is not guaranteed to be safe against a microcode update which affects MWAIT. Take the cpus_booted_once_mask into account to detect this case and refuse to load late if the vendor specific driver does not advertise that late loading is NMI safe. AMD stated that this is safe, so mark the AMD driver accordingly. This requirement will be partially lifted in later changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.087472735@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep()Thomas Gleixner
This function has nothing to do with suspend. It's a hotplug callback. Remove the bogus comment. Drop the pointless debug printk. The hotplug core provides tracepoints which track the invocation of those callbacks. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.028651784@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirectionThomas Gleixner
Scheduling work on all CPUs to collect the microcode information is just another extra step for no value. Let the CPU hotplug callback registration do it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.354748138@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Mop up early loading leftoversThomas Gleixner
Get rid of the initrd_gone hack which was required to keep find_microcode_in_initrd() functional after init. As find_microcode_in_initrd() is now only used during init, mark it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.298854846@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/amd: Use cached microcode for AP loadThomas Gleixner
Now that the microcode cache is initialized before the APs are brought up, there is no point in scanning builtin/initrd microcode during AP loading. Convert the AP loader to utilize the cache, which in turn makes the CPU hotplug callback which applies the microcode after initrd/builtin is gone, obsolete as the early loading during late hotplug operations including the resume path depends now only on the cache. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.243426023@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin/initrd microcode earlyThomas Gleixner
There is no reason to scan builtin/initrd microcode on each AP. Cache the builtin/initrd microcode in an early initcall so that the early AP loader can utilize the cache. The existing fs initcall which invoked save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() is still required to maintain the initrd_gone flag. Rename it accordingly. This will be removed once the AP loader code is converted to use the cache. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.187566507@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocationThomas Gleixner
Microcode is applied on the APs during early bringup. There is no point in trying to apply the microcode again during the hotplug operations and neither at the point where the microcode device is initialized. Collect CPU info and microcode revision in setup_online_cpu() for now. This will move to the CPU hotplug callback later. [ bp: Leave the starting notifier for the following scenario: - boot, late load, suspend to disk, resume without the starting notifier, only the last core manages to update the microcode upon resume: # rdmsr -a 0x8b 10000bf 10000bf 10000bf 10000bf 10000bf 10000dc <---- This is on an AMD F10h machine. For the future, one should check whether potential unification of the CPU init path could cover the resume path too so that this can be simplified even more. tglx: This is caused by the odd handling of APs which try to find the microcode blob in builtin or initrd instead of caching the microcode blob during early init before the APs are brought up. Will be cleaned up in a later step. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.018821624@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-loadThomas Gleixner
There are situations where the late microcode is loaded into memory but is not applied: 1) The rendezvous fails 2) The microcode is rejected by the CPUs If any of this happens then the pointer which was updated at firmware load time is stale and subsequent CPU hotplug operations either fail to update or create inconsistent microcode state. Save the loaded microcode in a separate pointer before the late load is attempted and when successful, update the hotplug pointer accordingly via a new microcode_ops callback. Remove the pointless fallback in the loader to a microcode pointer which is never populated. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.505491309@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loadingThomas Gleixner
The early loading code is overly complicated: - It scans the builtin/initrd for microcode not only on the BSP, but also on all APs during early boot and then later in the boot process it scans again to duplicate and save the microcode before initrd goes away. That's a pointless exercise because this can be simply done before bringing up the APs when the memory allocator is up and running. - Saving the microcode from within the scan loop is completely non-obvious and a left over of the microcode cache. This can be done at the call site now which makes it obvious. Rework the code so that only the BSP scans the builtin/initrd microcode once during early boot and save it away in an early initcall for later use. [ bp: Test and fold in a fix from tglx ontop which handles the need to distinguish what save_microcode() does depending on when it is called: - when on the BSP during early load, it needs to find a newer revision than the one currently loaded on the BSP - later, before SMP init, it still runs on the BSP and gets the BSP revision just loaded and uses that revision to know which patch to save for the APs. For that it needs to find the exact one as on the BSP. ] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.629085215@linutronix.de
2023-10-19x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUsAshok Raj
Mixed steppings aren't supported on Intel CPUs. Only one microcode patch is required for the entire system. The caching of microcode blobs which match the family and model is therefore pointless and in fact is dysfunctional as CPU hotplug updates use only a single microcode blob, i.e. the one where *intel_ucode_patch points to. Remove the microcode cache and make it an AMD local feature. [ tglx: - save only at the end. Otherwise random microcode ends up in the pointer for early loading - free the ucode patch pointer in save_microcode_patch() only after kmemdup() has succeeded, as reported by Andrew Cooper ] Originally-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.404362809@linutronix.de
2023-10-18x86/microcode/32: Move early loading after paging enableThomas Gleixner
32-bit loads microcode before paging is enabled. The commit which introduced that has zero justification in the changelog. The cover letter has slightly more content, but it does not give any technical justification either: "The problem in current microcode loading method is that we load a microcode way, way too late; ideally we should load it before turning paging on. This may only be practical on 32 bits since we can't get to 64-bit mode without paging on, but we should still do it as early as at all possible." Handwaving word salad with zero technical content. Someone claimed in an offlist conversation that this is required for curing the ATOM erratum AAE44/AAF40/AAG38/AAH41. That erratum requires an microcode update in order to make the usage of PSE safe. But during early boot, PSE is completely irrelevant and it is evaluated way later. Neither is it relevant for the AP on single core HT enabled CPUs as the microcode loading on the AP is not doing anything. On dual core CPUs there is a theoretical problem if a split of an executable large page between enabling paging including PSE and loading the microcode happens. But that's only theoretical, it's practically irrelevant because the affected dual core CPUs are 64bit enabled and therefore have paging and PSE enabled before loading the microcode on the second core. So why would it work on 64-bit but not on 32-bit? The erratum: "AAG38 Code Fetch May Occur to Incorrect Address After a Large Page is Split Into 4-Kbyte Pages Problem: If software clears the PS (page size) bit in a present PDE (page directory entry), that will cause linear addresses mapped through this PDE to use 4-KByte pages instead of using a large page after old TLB entries are invalidated. Due to this erratum, if a code fetch uses this PDE before the TLB entry for the large page is invalidated then it may fetch from a different physical address than specified by either the old large page translation or the new 4-KByte page translation. This erratum may also cause speculative code fetches from incorrect addresses." The practical relevance for this is exactly zero because there is no splitting of large text pages during early boot-time, i.e. between paging enable and microcode loading, and neither during CPU hotplug. IOW, this load microcode before paging enable is yet another voodoo programming solution in search of a problem. What's worse is that it causes at least two serious problems: 1) When stackprotector is enabled, the microcode loader code has the stackprotector mechanics enabled. The read from the per CPU variable __stack_chk_guard is always accessing the virtual address either directly on UP or via %fs on SMP. In physical address mode this results in an access to memory above 3GB. So this works by chance as the hardware returns the same value when there is no RAM at this physical address. When there is RAM populated above 3G then the read is by chance the same as nothing changes that memory during the very early boot stage. That's not necessarily true during runtime CPU hotplug. 2) When function tracing is enabled, the relevant microcode loader functions and the functions invoked from there will call into the tracing code and evaluate global and per CPU variables in physical address mode. What could potentially go wrong? Cure this and move the microcode loading after the early paging enable, use the new temporary initrd mapping and remove the gunk in the microcode loader which is required to handle physical address mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.348298216@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Move core specific defines to local headerThomas Gleixner
There is no reason to expose all of this globally. Move everything which is not required outside of the microcode specific code to local header files and into the respective source files. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.952876381@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Make reload_early_microcode() staticThomas Gleixner
fe055896c040 ("x86/microcode: Merge the early microcode loader") left this needlessly public. Git archaeology provided by Borislav. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.834943153@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Include vendor headers into microcode.hAshok Raj
Currently vendor specific headers are included explicitly when used in common code. Instead, include the vendor specific headers in microcode.h, and include that in all usages. No functional change. Suggested-by: Boris Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.776541545@linutronix.de
2023-08-08x86/microcode: Remove microcode_mutexSebastian Andrzej Siewior
microcode_mutex is only used by reload_store(). It has a comment saying "to synchronize with each other". Other user of this mutex have been removed in the commits 181b6f40e9ea8 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the OLD_INTERFACE"). b6f86689d5b74 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk") The sysfs interface does not need additional synchronisation vs itself because it is provided as kernfs_ops::mutex which is acquired in kernfs_fop_write_iter(). Remove the superfluous microcode_mutex. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804075853.JF_n6GXC@linutronix.de
2023-07-27x86/microcode/AMD: Rip out static buffersBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Load straight from the containers (initrd or builtin, for example). There's no need to cache the patch per node. This even simplifies the code a bit with the opportunity for more cleanups later. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230720202813.3269888-1-john.allen@amd.com
2023-03-17x86/microcode: move to use bus_get_dev_root()Greg Kroah-Hartman
Direct access to the struct bus_type dev_root pointer is going away soon so replace that with a call to bus_get_dev_root() instead, which is what it is there for. Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313182918.1312597-9-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-02-06x86/microcode/core: Return an error only when necessaryBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Return an error from the late loading function which is run on each CPU only when an error has actually been encountered during the update. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-5-bp@alien8.de
2023-02-06x86/microcode/AMD: Add a @cpu parameter to the reloading functionsBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Will be used in a subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-3-bp@alien8.de
2023-01-31x86/microcode: Allow only "1" as a late reload trigger valueAshok Raj
Microcode gets reloaded late only if "1" is written to the reload file. However, the code silently treats any other unsigned integer as a successful write even though no actions are performed to load microcode. Make the loader more strict to accept only "1" as a trigger value and return an error otherwise. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130213955.6046-3-ashok.raj@intel.com
2023-01-21x86/microcode: Adjust late loading result reporting messageAshok Raj
During late microcode loading, the "Reload completed" message is issued unconditionally, regardless of success or failure. Adjust the message to report the result of the update. [ bp: Massage. ] Fixes: 9bd681251b7c ("x86/microcode: Announce reload operation's completion") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/874judpqqd.ffs@tglx/
2023-01-21x86/microcode: Check CPU capabilities after late microcode update correctlyAshok Raj
The kernel caches each CPU's feature bits at boot in an x86_capability[] structure. However, the capabilities in the BSP's copy can be turned off as a result of certain command line parameters or configuration restrictions, for example the SGX bit. This can cause a mismatch when comparing the values before and after the microcode update. Another example is X86_FEATURE_SRBDS_CTRL which gets added only after microcode update: --- cpuid.before 2023-01-21 14:54:15.652000747 +0100 +++ cpuid.after 2023-01-21 14:54:26.632001024 +0100 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ CPU: 0x00000004 0x04: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x00000000 ecx=0x00000000 edx=0x00000000 0x00000005 0x00: eax=0x00000040 ebx=0x00000040 ecx=0x00000003 edx=0x11142120 0x00000006 0x00: eax=0x000027f7 ebx=0x00000002 ecx=0x00000001 edx=0x00000000 - 0x00000007 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x029c6fbf ecx=0x40000000 edx=0xbc002400 + 0x00000007 0x00: eax=0x00000000 ebx=0x029c6fbf ecx=0x40000000 edx=0xbc002e00 ^^^ and which proves for a gazillionth time that late loading is a bad bad idea. microcode_check() is called after an update to report any previously cached CPUID bits which might have changed due to the update. Therefore, store the cached CPU caps before the update and compare them with the CPU caps after the microcode update has succeeded. Thus, the comparison is done between the CPUID *hardware* bits before and after the upgrade instead of using the cached, possibly runtime modified values in BSP's boot_cpu_data copy. As a result, false warnings about CPUID bits changes are avoided. [ bp: - Massage. - Add SRBDS_CTRL example. - Add kernel-doc. - Incorporate forgotten review feedback from dhansen. ] Fixes: 1008c52c09dc ("x86/CPU: Add a microcode loader callback") Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230109153555.4986-3-ashok.raj@intel.com
2023-01-20x86/microcode: Add a parameter to microcode_check() to store CPU capabilitiesAshok Raj
Add a parameter to store CPU capabilities before performing a microcode update so that CPU capabilities can be compared before and after update. [ bp: Massage. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230109153555.4986-2-ashok.raj@intel.com
2023-01-18x86/microcode: Use the DEVICE_ATTR_RO() macroGuangju Wang[baidu]
Use DEVICE_ATTR_RO() helper instead of open-coded DEVICE_ATTR(), which makes the code a bit shorter and easier to read. No change in functionality. Signed-off-by: Guangju Wang[baidu] <wgj900@163.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118023554.1898-1-wgj900@163.com
2022-11-02x86/microcode: Drop struct ucode_cpu_info.validBorislav Petkov
It is not needed anymore. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028142638.28498-6-bp@alien8.de
2022-11-02x86/microcode: Do some minor fixupsBorislav Petkov
Improve debugging printks and fixup formatting. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028142638.28498-5-bp@alien8.de
2022-11-02x86/microcode: Kill refresh_fwBorislav Petkov
request_microcode_fw() can always request firmware now so drop this superfluous argument. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028142638.28498-4-bp@alien8.de
2022-11-02x86/microcode: Simplify init path even moreBorislav Petkov
Get rid of all the IPI-sending functions and their wrappers and use those which are supposed to be called on each CPU. Thus: - microcode_init_cpu() gets called on each CPU on init, applying any new microcode that the driver might've found on the filesystem. - mc_cpu_starting() simply tries to apply cached microcode as this is the cpuhp starting callback which gets called on CPU resume too. Even if the driver init function is a late initcall, there is no filesystem by then (not even a hdd driver has been loaded yet) so a new firmware load attempt cannot simply be done. It is pointless anyway - for that there's late loading if one really needs it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028142638.28498-3-bp@alien8.de
2022-11-02x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunkBorislav Petkov
This is a left-over from the old days when CPU hotplug wasn't as robust as it is now. Currently, microcode gets loaded early on the CPU init path and there's no need to attempt to load it again, which that subsys interface callback is doing. The only other thing that the subsys interface init path was doing is adding the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/microcode/ hierarchy. So add a function which gets called on each CPU after all the necessary driver setup has happened. Use schedule_on_each_cpu() which can block because the sysfs creating code does kmem_cache_zalloc() which can block too and the initial version of this where it did that setup in an IPI handler of on_each_cpu() can cause a deadlock of the sort: lock(fs_reclaim); <Interrupt> lock(fs_reclaim); as the IPI handler runs in IRQ context. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028142638.28498-2-bp@alien8.de
2022-09-02x86/microcode: Print previous version of microcode after reloadAshok Raj
Print both old and new versions of microcode after a reload is complete because knowing the previous microcode version is sometimes important from a debugging perspective. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829181030.722891-1-ashok.raj@intel.com