| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
For historic reasons there are some TSC-related functions in the
<asm/msr.h> header, even though there's an <asm/tsc.h> header.
To facilitate the relocation of rdtsc{,_ordered}() from <asm/msr.h>
to <asm/tsc.h> and to eventually eliminate the inclusion of
<asm/msr.h> in <asm/tsc.h>, add an explicit <asm/msr.h> dependency
to the source files that reference definitions from <asm/msr.h>.
[ mingo: Clarified the changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250501054241.1245648-1-xin@zytor.com
|
|
Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
When split_lock_mitigate is disabled, each CPU needs its own delayed_work
structure. They are used to reenable split lock detection after its
disabling. But delayed_work structure must be correctly initialized after
its allocation.
Current implementation uses deferred initialization that makes the
split lock handler code unclear. The code can be simplified a bit
if the initialization is moved to the appropriate initcall.
sld_setup() is called before setup_per_cpu_areas(), thus it can't be used
for this purpose, so introduce an independent initcall for
the initialization.
[ mingo: Simplified the 'work' assignment line a bit more. ]
Signed-off-by: Maksim Davydov <davydov-max@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250325085807.171885-1-davydov-max@yandex-team.ru
|
|
If the warning mode with disabled mitigation mode is used, then on each
CPU where the split lock occurred detection will be disabled in order to
make progress and delayed work will be scheduled, which then will enable
detection back.
Now it turns out that all CPUs use one global delayed work structure.
This leads to the fact that if a split lock occurs on several CPUs
at the same time (within 2 jiffies), only one CPU will schedule delayed
work, but the rest will not.
The return value of schedule_delayed_work_on() would have shown this,
but it is not checked in the code.
A diagram that can help to understand the bug reproduction:
- sld_update_msr() enables/disables SLD on both CPUs on the same core
- schedule_delayed_work_on() internally checks WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT.
If a work has the 'pending' status, then schedule_delayed_work_on()
will return an error code and, most importantly, the work will not
be placed in the workqueue.
Let's say we have a multicore system on which split_lock_mitigate=0 and
a multithreaded application is running that calls splitlock in multiple
threads. Due to the fact that sld_update_msr() affects the entire core
(both CPUs), we will consider 2 CPUs from different cores. Let the 2
threads of this application schedule to CPU0 (core 0) and to CPU 2
(core 1), then:
| || |
| CPU 0 (core 0) || CPU 2 (core 1) |
|_________________________________||___________________________________|
| || |
| 1) SPLIT LOCK occured || |
| || |
| 2) split_lock_warn() || |
| || |
| 3) sysctl_sld_mitigate == 0 || |
| (work = &sl_reenable) || |
| || |
| 4) schedule_delayed_work_on() || |
| (reenable will be called || |
| after 2 jiffies on CPU 0) || |
| || |
| 5) disable SLD for core 0 || |
| || |
| ------------------------- || |
| || |
| || 6) SPLIT LOCK occured |
| || |
| || 7) split_lock_warn() |
| || |
| || 8) sysctl_sld_mitigate == 0 |
| || (work = &sl_reenable, |
| || the same address as in 3) ) |
| || |
| 2 jiffies || 9) schedule_delayed_work_on() |
| || fials because the work is in |
| || the pending state since 4). |
| || The work wasn't placed to the |
| || workqueue. reenable won't be |
| || called on CPU 2 |
| || |
| || 10) disable SLD for core 0 |
| || |
| || From now on SLD will |
| || never be reenabled on core 1 |
| || |
| ------------------------- || |
| || |
| 11) enable SLD for core 0 by || |
| __split_lock_reenable || |
| || |
If the application threads can be scheduled to all processor cores,
then over time there will be only one core left, on which SLD will be
enabled and split lock will be able to be detected; and on all other
cores SLD will be disabled all the time.
Most likely, this bug has not been noticed for so long because
sysctl_sld_mitigate default value is 1, and in this case a semaphore
is used that does not allow 2 different cores to have SLD disabled at
the same time, that is, strictly only one work is placed in the
workqueue.
In order to fix the warning mode with disabled mitigation mode,
delayed work has to be per-CPU. Implement it.
Fixes: 727209376f49 ("x86/split_lock: Add sysctl to control the misery mode")
Signed-off-by: Maksim Davydov <davydov-max@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250115131704.132609-1-davydov-max@yandex-team.ru
|
|
Add the const qualifier to all the ctl_tables in the tree except for
watchdog_hardlockup_sysctl, memory_allocation_profiling_sysctls,
loadpin_sysctl_table and the ones calling register_net_sysctl (./net,
drivers/inifiniband dirs). These are special cases as they use a
registration function with a non-const qualified ctl_table argument or
modify the arrays before passing them on to the registration function.
Constifying ctl_table structs will prevent the modification of
proc_handler function pointers as the arrays would reside in .rodata.
This is made possible after commit 78eb4ea25cd5 ("sysctl: treewide:
constify the ctl_table argument of proc_handlers") constified all the
proc_handlers.
Created this by running an spatch followed by a sed command:
Spatch:
virtual patch
@
depends on !(file in "net")
disable optional_qualifier
@
identifier table_name != {
watchdog_hardlockup_sysctl,
iwcm_ctl_table,
ucma_ctl_table,
memory_allocation_profiling_sysctls,
loadpin_sysctl_table
};
@@
+ const
struct ctl_table table_name [] = { ... };
sed:
sed --in-place \
-e "s/struct ctl_table .table = &uts_kern/const struct ctl_table *table = \&uts_kern/" \
kernel/utsname_sysctl.c
Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> # for kernel/trace/
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> # SCSI
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> # xfs
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>
|
|
Bus Lock Detect functionality on AMD platforms works identical to Intel.
Move split_lock and bus_lock specific code from intel.c to a dedicated
file so that it can be compiled and supported on non-Intel platforms.
Also, introduce CONFIG_X86_BUS_LOCK_DETECT, make it dependent on
CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL and add compilation dependency of the new bus_lock.c
file on CONFIG_X86_BUS_LOCK_DETECT.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240808062937.1149-2-ravi.bangoria@amd.com
|
