| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() provides JIT size of the BPF trampoline
before the buffer for JIT'ing it is allocated. The total number of
instructions emitted for BPF trampoline JIT code depends on where
the final image is located. So, the size arrived at with the dummy
pass in arch_bpf_trampoline_size() can vary from the actual size
needed in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). When the instructions
accounted in arch_bpf_trampoline_size() is less than the number of
instructions emitted during the actual JIT compile of the trampoline,
the below warning is produced:
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 204190 at arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:981 __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline.isra.0+0xd2c/0xdcc
which is:
/* Make sure the trampoline generation logic doesn't overflow */
if (image && WARN_ON_ONCE(&image[ctx->idx] >
(u32 *)rw_image_end - BPF_INSN_SAFETY)) {
So, during the dummy pass, instead of providing some arbitrary image
location, account for maximum possible instructions if and when there
is a dependency with image location for JIT'ing.
Fixes: d243b62b7bd3 ("powerpc64/bpf: Add support for bpf trampolines")
Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6168bfc8-659f-4b5a-a6fb-90a916dde3b3@linux.ibm.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+
Acked-by: Naveen N Rao (AMD) <naveen@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250422082609.949301-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Add support for bpf_arch_text_poke() and arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline()
for 64-bit powerpc. While the code is generic, BPF trampolines are only
enabled on 64-bit powerpc. 32-bit powerpc will need testing and some
updates.
BPF Trampolines adhere to the existing ftrace ABI utilizing a
two-instruction profiling sequence, as well as the newer ABI utilizing a
three-instruction profiling sequence enabling return with a 'blr'. The
trampoline code itself closely follows x86 implementation.
BPF prog JIT is extended to mimic 64-bit powerpc approach for ftrace
having a single nop at function entry, followed by the function
profiling sequence out-of-line and a separate long branch stub for calls
to trampolines that are out of range. A dummy_tramp is provided to
simplify synchronization similar to arm64.
When attaching a bpf trampoline to a bpf prog, we can patch up to three
things:
- the nop at bpf prog entry to go to the out-of-line stub
- the instruction in the out-of-line stub to either call the bpf trampoline
directly, or to branch to the long_branch stub.
- the trampoline address before the long_branch stub.
We do not need any synchronization here since we always have a valid
branch target regardless of the order in which the above stores are
seen. dummy_tramp ensures that the long_branch stub goes to a valid
destination on other cpus, even when the branch to the long_branch stub
is seen before the updated trampoline address.
However, when detaching a bpf trampoline from a bpf prog, or if changing
the bpf trampoline address, we need synchronization to ensure that other
cpus can no longer branch into the older trampoline so that it can be
safely freed. bpf_tramp_image_put() uses rcu_tasks to ensure all cpus
make forward progress, but we still need to ensure that other cpus
execute isync (or some CSI) so that they don't go back into the
trampoline again. While here, update the stale comment that describes
the redzone usage in ppc64 BPF JIT.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241030070850.1361304-18-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel()
Commit 61688a82e047 ("powerpc/bpf: enable kfunc call") enhanced
bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() to handle calls out to module region, where
bpf progs are generated. The only difference now between
bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() and bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel() is in
handling of the initial pass where target function address is not known.
Fold that logic into bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp() and rename it to
bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel() to simplify bpf function call JIT code.
We don't actually need to load/restore TOC across a call out to a
different kernel helper or to a different bpf program since they all
work with the kernel TOC. We only need to do it if we have to call out
to a module function. So, guard TOC load/restore with appropriate
conditions.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241030070850.1361304-10-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Add jit support for sign division and modulo. Tested using test_bpf
module.
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240517075650.248801-6-asavkov@redhat.com
|
|
Add jit support for sign extended mov. Tested using test_bpf module.
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240517075650.248801-5-asavkov@redhat.com
|
|
Add jit support for sign extended load. Tested using test_bpf module.
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240517075650.248801-4-asavkov@redhat.com
|
|
Add jit support for unconditional byte swap. Tested using BSWAP tests
from test_bpf module.
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240517075650.248801-3-asavkov@redhat.com
|
|
Add jit support for JMP32_JA instruction. Tested using test_bpf module.
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240517075650.248801-2-asavkov@redhat.com
|
|
The Linux Kernel Memory Model [1][2] requires RMW operations that have a
return value to be fully ordered.
BPF atomic operations with BPF_FETCH (including BPF_XCHG and
BPF_CMPXCHG) return a value back so they need to be JITed to fully
ordered operations. POWERPC currently emits relaxed operations for
these.
We can show this by running the following litmus-test:
PPC SB+atomic_add+fetch
{
0:r0=x; (* dst reg assuming offset is 0 *)
0:r1=2; (* src reg *)
0:r2=1;
0:r4=y; (* P0 writes to this, P1 reads this *)
0:r5=z; (* P1 writes to this, P0 reads this *)
0:r6=0;
1:r2=1;
1:r4=y;
1:r5=z;
}
P0 | P1 ;
stw r2, 0(r4) | stw r2,0(r5) ;
| ;
loop:lwarx r3, r6, r0 | ;
mr r8, r3 | ;
add r3, r3, r1 | sync ;
stwcx. r3, r6, r0 | ;
bne loop | ;
mr r1, r8 | ;
| ;
lwa r7, 0(r5) | lwa r7,0(r4) ;
~exists(0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0)
Witnesses
Positive: 9 Negative: 3
Condition ~exists (0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0)
Observation SB+atomic_add+fetch Sometimes 3 9
This test shows that the older store in P0 is reordered with a newer
load to a different address. Although there is a RMW operation with
fetch between them. Adding a sync before and after RMW fixes the issue:
Witnesses
Positive: 9 Negative: 0
Condition ~exists (0:r7=0 /\ 1:r7=0)
Observation SB+atomic_add+fetch Never 0 9
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/atomic_t.txt
Fixes: aea7ef8a82c0 ("powerpc/bpf/32: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operations")
Fixes: 2d9206b22743 ("powerpc/bpf/32: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Fixes: dbe6e2456fb0 ("powerpc/bpf/64: add support for atomic fetch operations")
Fixes: 1e82dfaa7819 ("powerpc/bpf/64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.0+
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240513100248.110535-1-puranjay@kernel.org
|
|
Currently, bpf jit code on powerpc assumes all the bpf functions and
helpers to be part of core kernel text. This is false for kfunc case,
as function addresses may not be part of core kernel text area. So,
add support for addresses that are not within core kernel text area
too, to enable kfunc support. Emit instructions based on whether the
function address is within core kernel text address or not, to retain
optimized instruction sequence where possible.
In case of PCREL, as a bpf function that is not within core kernel
text area is likely to go out of range with relative addressing on
kernel base, use PC relative addressing. If that goes out of range,
load the full address with PPC_LI64().
With addresses that are not within core kernel text area supported,
override bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call() to enable kfunc support. Also,
override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() to enable 64-bit pointers,
as an address offset can be more than 32-bit long on PPC64.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240502173205.142794-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
With PCREL addressing, there is no kernel TOC. So, it is not setup in
prologue when PCREL addressing is used. But the number of instructions
to skip on a tail call was not adjusted accordingly. That resulted in
not so obvious failures while using tailcalls. 'tailcalls' selftest
crashed the system with the below call trace:
bpf_test_run+0xe8/0x3cc (unreliable)
bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x348/0x778
__sys_bpf+0xb04/0x2b00
sys_bpf+0x28/0x38
system_call_exception+0x168/0x340
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
Also, as bpf programs are always module addresses and a bpf helper in
general is a core kernel text address, using PC relative addressing
often fails with "out of range of pcrel address" error. Switch to
using kernel base for relative addressing to handle this better.
Fixes: 7e3a68be42e1 ("powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresing")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.4+
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240502173205.142794-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc in powerpc jit. The jit engine first
writes the program to the rw buffer. When the jit is done, the program
is copied to the final location with bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize.
With multiple jit_subprogs, bpf_jit_free is called on some subprograms
that haven't got bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet. Implement custom
bpf_jit_free() like in commit 1d5f82d9dd47 ("bpf, x86: fix freeing of
not-finalized bpf_prog_pack") to call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(),
if necessary. As bpf_flush_icache() is not needed anymore, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231020141358.643575-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
PC-Relative or PCREL addressing is an extension to the ELF ABI which
uses Power ISA v3.1 PC-relative instructions to calculate addresses,
rather than the traditional TOC scheme.
Add an option to build vmlinux using pcrel addressing. Modules continue
to use TOC addressing.
- TOC address helpers and r2 are poisoned with -1 when running vmlinux.
r2 could be used for something useful once things are ironed out.
- Assembly must call C functions with @notoc annotation, or the linker
complains aobut a missing nop after the call. This is done with the
CFUNC macro introduced earlier.
- Boot: with the exception of prom_init, the execution branches to the
kernel virtual address early in boot, before any addresses are
generated, which ensures 34-bit pcrel addressing does not miss the
high PAGE_OFFSET bits. TOC relative addressing has a similar
requirement. prom_init does not go to the virtual address and its
addresses should not carry over to the post-prom kernel.
- Ftrace trampolines are converted from TOC addressing to pcrel
addressing, including module ftrace trampolines that currently use the
kernel TOC to find ftrace target functions.
- BPF function prologue and function calling generation are converted
from TOC to pcrel.
- copypage_64.S has an interesting problem, prefixed instructions have
alignment restrictions so the linker can add padding, which makes the
assembler treat the difference between two local labels as
non-constant even if alignment is arranged so padding is not required.
This may need toolchain help to solve nicely, for now move the prefix
instruction out of the alternate patch section to work around it.
This reduces kernel text size by about 6%.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230408021752.862660-6-npiggin@gmail.com
|
|
Now that two real additional passes are performed in case of extra pass
requested by BPF core, padding is not needed anymore except during
initial pass done before memory allocation to count maximum possible
program size.
So, only do the padding when 'image' is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/921851d6577badc1e6b08b270a0ced80a6a26d03.1675245773.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
BPF core calls the jit compiler again for an extra pass in order
to properly set subprog addresses.
Unlike other architectures, powerpc only updates the addresses
during that extra pass. It means that holes must have been left
in the code in order to enable the maximum possible instruction
size.
In order to avoid waste of space, and waste of CPU time on powerpc
processors on which the NOP instruction is not 0-cycle, perform
two real additional passes.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d484a4ac95949ff55fc4344b674e7c0d3ddbfcd5.1675245773.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc64, both
of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg
operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register
fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API
calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's
atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the
same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0.
BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg);
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le)
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Adding instructions for ppc64 for
atomic[64]_fetch_add
atomic[64]_fetch_and
atomic[64]_fetch_or
atomic[64]_fetch_xor
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le)
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Adding instructions for ppc64 for
atomic[64]_and
atomic[64]_or
atomic[64]_xor
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le)
Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Now that we have CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 and CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2,
get rid of all indirect detection of ABI version.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/709d9d69523c14c8a9fba4486395dca0f2d675b1.1652074503.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
Replace all uses of PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 and PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 by
resp CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 and CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ba13d59e8c50bc9aa6328f1c7f0c0d0278e0a3a7.1652074503.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
Convert bpf_to_ppc() to a macro to help simplify its usage since
codegen_context is available in all places it is used. Adopt it also for
powerpc64 for uniformity and get rid of the global b2p structure.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/09f0540ce3e0cd4120b5b33993b5e73b6ef9e979.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
In bpf_jit_build_body(), the mapping of TMP_REG_1 and TMP_REG_2's bpf
register to ppc register is evalulated at every use despite not
changing. Instead, determine the ppc register once and store the result.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
[Rebased, converted additional usage sites]
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0944e2f0fa6dd254ea401f1c946fb6c9a5294278.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Use _Rn macros to specify register names to make their usage clear.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7df626b8cdc6141d4295ac16137c82ad570b6637.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
There is no need for a separate header anymore. Move the contents of
bpf_jit64.h into bpf_jit_comp64.c
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b873a8e6eff7d91bf2a2cabdd53082aadfe20761.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
All these macros now have a single user. Expand their usage in place.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e0526fc7633a34f983a7a330712b55bdfaf20482.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
PPC_BPF_[LL|STL] are macros meant for scenarios where we may have to
deal with a non-word aligned offset. Limit their usage to only those
scenarios by converting the rest to just use PPC_BPF_[LD|STD].
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0eb472428165a307f6fdaf22b0c33cbf13a9a635.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
When calling BPF helpers, we load the function address to call into a
register. This can result in upto 5 instructions. Optimize this by
instead using the kernel toc in r2 and adjusting offset to the BPF
helper. This works since all BPF helpers are part of kernel text, and
all BPF programs/functions utilize the kernel TOC.
Further more:
- load the actual function entry address in elf v1, rather than loading
it through the function descriptor address.
- load the Local Entry Point (LEP) in elf v2 skipping TOC setup.
- consolidate code across elf abi v1 and v2 by using r12 on both.
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1233c7544e60dcb021c52b1f840b0f21a87b33ed.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
BPF helpers always reside in core kernel and all BPF programs use the
kernel TOC. As such, there is no need to load the TOC before calling
helpers or other BPF functions. Drop code to do the same.
Add a check to ensure we don't proceed if this assumption ever changes
in future.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a3cd3da4d24d95d845cd10382b1af083600c9074.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
In preparation for using kernel TOC, load the same in r2 on entry. With
elfv1, the kernel TOC is already setup by our caller.
We adjust the number of instructions to skip on a tail call accordingly.
We get rid of the #ifdef in bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() since
FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE is itself under a #ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/18a05a4ceec14a8617c9dd4b7128d0afa83fd14e.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Instead of saving and restoring LR before each invocation to
bpf_stf_barrier(), set SEEN_FUNC flag so that we save/restore LR in
prologue/epilogue.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4446f25478d82a2a4ac9dab2ebdfd88ddf923eb7.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
In some scenarios, it is possible that the program epilogue is outside
the branch range for a BPF_EXIT instruction. Instead of rejecting such
programs, emit epilogue as an alternate exit point from the program.
Track the location of the same so that subsequent exits can take either
of the two paths.
Reported-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33aa2e92645a92712be23b18035a2c6dcb92ff8d.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
PPC_BCC() emits two instructions to accommodate scenarios where we need
to branch outside the range of a conditional branch. PPC_BCC_SHORT()
emits a single branch instruction and can be used when the branch is
known to be within a conditional branch range.
Convert some of the uses of PPC_BCC() in the powerpc BPF JIT over to
PPC_BCC_SHORT() where we know the branch range.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edbca01377d1d5f472868bf6d8962b0a0d85b96f.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Johan reported the below crash with test_bpf on ppc64 e5500:
test_bpf: #296 ALU_END_FROM_LE 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500
Modules linked in: test_bpf(+)
CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty #1
NIP: 8000000000061c3c LR: 80000000006dea64 CTR: 8000000000061c18
REGS: c0000000032d3420 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty)
MSR: 0000000080089000 <EE,ME> CR: 88002822 XER: 20000000 IRQMASK: 0
<...>
NIP [8000000000061c3c] 0x8000000000061c3c
LR [80000000006dea64] .__run_one+0x104/0x17c [test_bpf]
Call Trace:
.__run_one+0x60/0x17c [test_bpf] (unreliable)
.test_bpf_init+0x6a8/0xdc8 [test_bpf]
.do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x28c
.do_init_module+0x68/0x28c
.load_module+0x2460/0x2abc
.__do_sys_init_module+0x120/0x18c
.system_call_exception+0x110/0x1b8
system_call_common+0xf0/0x210
--- interrupt: c00 at 0x101d0acc
<...>
---[ end trace 47b2bf19090bb3d0 ]---
Illegal instruction
The illegal instruction turned out to be 'ldbrx' emitted for
BPF_FROM_[L|B]E, which was only introduced in ISA v2.06. Guard use of
the same and implement an alternative approach for older processors.
Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Reported-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d1e51c6fdf572062cf3009a751c3406bda01b832.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
These instructions are updated after the initial JIT, so redo codegen
during the extra pass. Rename bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls() to clarify
that this is more than just subprog calls.
Fixes: 69c087ba6225b5 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7cc162af77ba918eb3ecd26ec9e7824bc44b1fae.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux
Pull powerpc updates from Michael Ellerman:
- Optimise radix KVM guest entry/exit by 2x on Power9/Power10.
- Allow firmware to tell us whether to disable the entry and uaccess
flushes on Power10 or later CPUs.
- Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for 32 and 64-bit BPF jits.
- Several fixes and improvements to our hard lockup watchdog.
- Activate HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on 32-bit.
- Allow building the 64-bit Book3S kernel without hash MMU support, ie.
Radix only.
- Add KUAP (SMAP) support for 40x, 44x, 8xx, Book3E (64-bit).
- Add new encodings for perf_mem_data_src.mem_hops field, and use them
on Power10.
- A series of small performance improvements to 64-bit interrupt entry.
- Several commits fixing issues when building with the clang integrated
assembler.
- Many other small features and fixes.
Thanks to Alan Modra, Alexey Kardashevskiy, Ammar Faizi, Anders Roxell,
Arnd Bergmann, Athira Rajeev, Cédric Le Goater, Christophe JAILLET,
Christophe Leroy, Christoph Hellwig, Daniel Axtens, David Yang, Erhard
Furtner, Fabiano Rosas, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Guo Ren, Hari Bathini, Jason
Wang, Joel Stanley, Julia Lawall, Kajol Jain, Kees Cook, Laurent Dufour,
Madhavan Srinivasan, Mark Brown, Minghao Chi, Nageswara R Sastry, Naresh
Kamboju, Nathan Chancellor, Nathan Lynch, Nicholas Piggin, Nick Child,
Oliver O'Halloran, Peiwei Hu, Randy Dunlap, Ravi Bangoria, Rob Herring,
Russell Currey, Sachin Sant, Sean Christopherson, Segher Boessenkool,
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, Tyrel Datwyler, Xiang wangx, and Yang
Guang.
* tag 'powerpc-5.17-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux: (240 commits)
powerpc/xmon: Dump XIVE information for online-only processors.
powerpc/opal: use default_groups in kobj_type
powerpc/cacheinfo: use default_groups in kobj_type
powerpc/sched: Remove unused TASK_SIZE_OF
powerpc/xive: Add missing null check after calling kmalloc
powerpc/floppy: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
selftests/powerpc: Add a test of sigreturning to an unaligned address
powerpc/64s: Use EMIT_WARN_ENTRY for SRR debug warnings
powerpc/64s: Mask NIP before checking against SRR0
powerpc/perf: Fix spelling of "its"
powerpc/32: Fix boot failure with GCC latent entropy plugin
powerpc/code-patching: Replace patch_instruction() by ppc_inst_write() in selftests
powerpc/code-patching: Move code patching selftests in its own file
powerpc/code-patching: Move instr_is_branch_{i/b}form() in code-patching.h
powerpc/code-patching: Move patch_exception() outside code-patching.c
powerpc/code-patching: Use test_trampoline for prefixed patch test
powerpc/code-patching: Fix patch_branch() return on out-of-range failure
powerpc/code-patching: Reorganise do_patch_instruction() to ease error handling
powerpc/code-patching: Fix unmap_patch_area() error handling
powerpc/code-patching: Fix error handling in do_patch_instruction()
...
|
|
On PPC64 with KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to
access userspace needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP.
But that is not happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction.
So, when BPF program tries to access invalid userspace address,
page-fault handler considers it as bad KUAP fault:
Kernel attempted to read user page (d0000000) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
Considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID (which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM
mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer or NULL but should
never be a pointer to userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM load
only if addr is kernel address, otherwise set dst_reg=0 and move on.
This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad
kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table.
[Alexei suggested for x86]
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-7-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.
Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains two instructions,
first instruction clears dest_reg and 2nd jumps to next instruction
in the BPF code. extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of
the instruction and 'fixup' field contains relative offset of the
fixup entry. Example layout of BPF program with extable present:
+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| ld r27,4(r3) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r4) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4280 -->| li r27,0 | \ fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4288 -->| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b0 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffec | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffec |
+------------------+
(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Refactor powerpc LDX JITing code to simplify adding BPF_PROBE_MEM
support.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
In case of extra_pass, usual JIT passes are always skipped. So,
extra_pass is always false while calling bpf_jit_build_body() and
can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
|
|
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater
than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent
with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance.
We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow
bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63
("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order
to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is
reasonable.
After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can
see there exists failed testcase.
On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set:
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
On some archs:
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf
# dmesg | grep -w FAIL
Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25
("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good
to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code
more readable.
The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and
limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the
mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh.
For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as
suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes,
it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT
can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases
in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the
JIT.
Here are the test results on x86_64:
# uname -m
x86_64
# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
# modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls
# dmesg | tail -1
test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed]
# rmmod test_bpf
# ./test_progs -t tailcalls
#142 tailcalls:OK
Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
|
|
Emit similar instruction sequences to commit a048a07d7f4535
("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel
entry/exit") when encountering BPF_NOSPEC.
Mitigations are enabled depending on what the firmware advertises. In
particular, we do not gate these mitigations based on current settings,
just like in x86. Due to this, we don't need to take any action if
mitigations are enabled or disabled at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/956570cbc191cd41f8274bed48ee757a86dac62a.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
We aren't handling subtraction involving an immediate value of
0x80000000 properly. Fix the same.
Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
[mpe: Fold in fix from Naveen to use imm <= 32768]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fc4b1276eb10761fd7ce0814c8dd089da2815251.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Only ignore the operation if dividing by 1.
Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c674ca18c3046885602caebb326213731c675d06.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Add checks to ensure that we never emit branch instructions with
truncated branch offsets.
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/71d33a6b7603ec1013c9734dd8bdd4ff5e929142.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction
/either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to
/no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected
by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already.
This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence'
instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation
as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled,
it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional
instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow
as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4
since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and
ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs.
The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does
annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers.
Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
|
|
Commit 91c960b0056672 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other
atomics in .imm") converted BPF_XADD to BPF_ATOMIC and added a way to
distinguish instructions based on the immediate field. Existing JIT
implementations were updated to check for the immediate field and to
reject programs utilizing anything more than BPF_ADD (such as BPF_FETCH)
in the immediate field.
However, the check added to powerpc64 JIT did not look at the correct
BPF instruction. Due to this, such programs would be accepted and
incorrectly JIT'ed resulting in soft lockups, as seen with the atomic
bounds test. Fix this by looking at the correct immediate value.
Fixes: 91c960b0056672 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm")
Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4117b430ffaa8cd7af042496f87fd7539e4f17fd.1625145429.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
blrl corrupts the link stack. Instead use bctrl when making function
calls from BPF programs.
Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210609090024.1446800-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
|
|
Use PPC_RAW_MFLR() instead of open coding with PPC_INST_MFLR.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c1887623e91e8b4da36e669e4c74de86320a5092.1621506159.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
PPC32
When the BPF routine doesn't call any function, the non volatile
registers can be reallocated to volatile registers in order to
avoid having to save them/restore on the stack.
Before this patch, the test #359 ADD default X is:
0: 7c 64 1b 78 mr r4,r3
4: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0
8: 94 21 ff b0 stwu r1,-80(r1)
c: 60 00 00 00 nop
10: 92 e1 00 2c stw r23,44(r1)
14: 93 01 00 30 stw r24,48(r1)
18: 93 21 00 34 stw r25,52(r1)
1c: 93 41 00 38 stw r26,56(r1)
20: 39 80 00 00 li r12,0
24: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
28: 3b 40 00 00 li r26,0
2c: 3b 20 00 00 li r25,0
30: 7c 98 23 78 mr r24,r4
34: 7c 77 1b 78 mr r23,r3
38: 39 80 00 42 li r12,66
3c: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
40: 7d 8c d2 14 add r12,r12,r26
44: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
48: 7d 83 63 78 mr r3,r12
4c: 82 e1 00 2c lwz r23,44(r1)
50: 83 01 00 30 lwz r24,48(r1)
54: 83 21 00 34 lwz r25,52(r1)
58: 83 41 00 38 lwz r26,56(r1)
5c: 38 21 00 50 addi r1,r1,80
60: 4e 80 00 20 blr
After this patch, the same test has become:
0: 7c 64 1b 78 mr r4,r3
4: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0
8: 94 21 ff b0 stwu r1,-80(r1)
c: 60 00 00 00 nop
10: 39 80 00 00 li r12,0
14: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
18: 39 00 00 00 li r8,0
1c: 38 e0 00 00 li r7,0
20: 7c 86 23 78 mr r6,r4
24: 7c 65 1b 78 mr r5,r3
28: 39 80 00 42 li r12,66
2c: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
30: 7d 8c 42 14 add r12,r12,r8
34: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0
38: 7d 83 63 78 mr r3,r12
3c: 38 21 00 50 addi r1,r1,80
40: 4e 80 00 20 blr
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b94562d7d2bb21aec89de0c40bb3cd91054b65a2.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
Move into bpf_jit_comp.c the functions that will remain common to
PPC64 and PPC32 when we add support of EBPF for PPC32.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2c339d77fb168ef12b213ccddfee3cb6c8ce8ae1.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
