summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-04-20powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresingNicholas Piggin
PC-Relative or PCREL addressing is an extension to the ELF ABI which uses Power ISA v3.1 PC-relative instructions to calculate addresses, rather than the traditional TOC scheme. Add an option to build vmlinux using pcrel addressing. Modules continue to use TOC addressing. - TOC address helpers and r2 are poisoned with -1 when running vmlinux. r2 could be used for something useful once things are ironed out. - Assembly must call C functions with @notoc annotation, or the linker complains aobut a missing nop after the call. This is done with the CFUNC macro introduced earlier. - Boot: with the exception of prom_init, the execution branches to the kernel virtual address early in boot, before any addresses are generated, which ensures 34-bit pcrel addressing does not miss the high PAGE_OFFSET bits. TOC relative addressing has a similar requirement. prom_init does not go to the virtual address and its addresses should not carry over to the post-prom kernel. - Ftrace trampolines are converted from TOC addressing to pcrel addressing, including module ftrace trampolines that currently use the kernel TOC to find ftrace target functions. - BPF function prologue and function calling generation are converted from TOC to pcrel. - copypage_64.S has an interesting problem, prefixed instructions have alignment restrictions so the linker can add padding, which makes the assembler treat the difference between two local labels as non-constant even if alignment is arranged so padding is not required. This may need toolchain help to solve nicely, for now move the prefix instruction out of the alternate patch section to work around it. This reduces kernel text size by about 6%. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20230408021752.862660-6-npiggin@gmail.com
2023-02-10powerpc/bpf: Only pad length-variable code at initial passChristophe Leroy
Now that two real additional passes are performed in case of extra pass requested by BPF core, padding is not needed anymore except during initial pass done before memory allocation to count maximum possible program size. So, only do the padding when 'image' is NULL. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/921851d6577badc1e6b08b270a0ced80a6a26d03.1675245773.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2023-02-10powerpc/bpf: Perform complete extra passes to update addressesChristophe Leroy
BPF core calls the jit compiler again for an extra pass in order to properly set subprog addresses. Unlike other architectures, powerpc only updates the addresses during that extra pass. It means that holes must have been left in the code in order to enable the maximum possible instruction size. In order to avoid waste of space, and waste of CPU time on powerpc processors on which the NOP instruction is not 0-cycle, perform two real additional passes. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d484a4ac95949ff55fc4344b674e7c0d3ddbfcd5.1675245773.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2022-06-29powerpc/bpf/64: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchgHari Bathini
This adds two atomic opcodes BPF_XCHG and BPF_CMPXCHG on ppc64, both of which include the BPF_FETCH flag. The kernel's atomic_cmpxchg operation fundamentally has 3 operands, but we only have two register fields. Therefore the operand we compare against (the kernel's API calls it 'old') is hard-coded to be BPF_REG_R0. Also, kernel's atomic_cmpxchg returns the previous value at dst_reg + off. JIT the same for BPF too with return value put in BPF_REG_0. BPF_REG_R0 = atomic_cmpxchg(dst_reg + off, BPF_REG_R0, src_reg); Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le) Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2022-06-29powerpc/bpf/64: add support for atomic fetch operationsHari Bathini
Adding instructions for ppc64 for atomic[64]_fetch_add atomic[64]_fetch_and atomic[64]_fetch_or atomic[64]_fetch_xor Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le) Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2022-06-29powerpc/bpf/64: add support for BPF_ATOMIC bitwise operationsHari Bathini
Adding instructions for ppc64 for atomic[64]_and atomic[64]_or atomic[64]_xor Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (ppc64le) Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610155552.25892-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2022-05-19powerpc: Finalise cleanup around ABI useChristophe Leroy
Now that we have CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 and CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2, get rid of all indirect detection of ABI version. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/709d9d69523c14c8a9fba4486395dca0f2d675b1.1652074503.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2022-05-19powerpc: Replace PPC64_ELF_ABI_v{1/2} by CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V{1/2}Christophe Leroy
Replace all uses of PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1 and PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2 by resp CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 and CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ba13d59e8c50bc9aa6328f1c7f0c0d0278e0a3a7.1652074503.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2022-03-08powerpc/bpf: Simplify bpf_to_ppc() and adopt it for powerpc64Naveen N. Rao
Convert bpf_to_ppc() to a macro to help simplify its usage since codegen_context is available in all places it is used. Adopt it also for powerpc64 for uniformity and get rid of the global b2p structure. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/09f0540ce3e0cd4120b5b33993b5e73b6ef9e979.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf: Store temp registers' bpf to ppc mappingJordan Niethe
In bpf_jit_build_body(), the mapping of TMP_REG_1 and TMP_REG_2's bpf register to ppc register is evalulated at every use despite not changing. Instead, determine the ppc register once and store the result. Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> [Rebased, converted additional usage sites] Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0944e2f0fa6dd254ea401f1c946fb6c9a5294278.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc/bpf: Use _Rn macros for GPRsNaveen N. Rao
Use _Rn macros to specify register names to make their usage clear. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7df626b8cdc6141d4295ac16137c82ad570b6637.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc/bpf: Move bpf_jit64.h into bpf_jit_comp64.cNaveen N. Rao
There is no need for a separate header anymore. Move the contents of bpf_jit64.h into bpf_jit_comp64.c Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b873a8e6eff7d91bf2a2cabdd53082aadfe20761.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf: Get rid of PPC_BPF_[LL|STL|STLU] macrosNaveen N. Rao
All these macros now have a single user. Expand their usage in place. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e0526fc7633a34f983a7a330712b55bdfaf20482.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf: Convert some of the uses of PPC_BPF_[LL|STL] to PPC_BPF_[LD|STD]Naveen N. Rao
PPC_BPF_[LL|STL] are macros meant for scenarios where we may have to deal with a non-word aligned offset. Limit their usage to only those scenarios by converting the rest to just use PPC_BPF_[LD|STD]. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0eb472428165a307f6fdaf22b0c33cbf13a9a635.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf: Optimize instruction sequence used for function callsNaveen N. Rao
When calling BPF helpers, we load the function address to call into a register. This can result in upto 5 instructions. Optimize this by instead using the kernel toc in r2 and adjusting offset to the BPF helper. This works since all BPF helpers are part of kernel text, and all BPF programs/functions utilize the kernel TOC. Further more: - load the actual function entry address in elf v1, rather than loading it through the function descriptor address. - load the Local Entry Point (LEP) in elf v2 skipping TOC setup. - consolidate code across elf abi v1 and v2 by using r12 on both. Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1233c7544e60dcb021c52b1f840b0f21a87b33ed.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf elfv1: Do not load TOC before calling functionsNaveen N. Rao
BPF helpers always reside in core kernel and all BPF programs use the kernel TOC. As such, there is no need to load the TOC before calling helpers or other BPF functions. Drop code to do the same. Add a check to ensure we don't proceed if this assumption ever changes in future. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a3cd3da4d24d95d845cd10382b1af083600c9074.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf elfv2: Setup kernel TOC in r2 on entryNaveen N. Rao
In preparation for using kernel TOC, load the same in r2 on entry. With elfv1, the kernel TOC is already setup by our caller. We adjust the number of instructions to skip on a tail call accordingly. We get rid of the #ifdef in bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() since FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE is itself under a #ifdef. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/18a05a4ceec14a8617c9dd4b7128d0afa83fd14e.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc64/bpf: Do not save/restore LR on each call to bpf_stf_barrier()Naveen N. Rao
Instead of saving and restoring LR before each invocation to bpf_stf_barrier(), set SEEN_FUNC flag so that we save/restore LR in prologue/epilogue. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4446f25478d82a2a4ac9dab2ebdfd88ddf923eb7.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc/bpf: Handle large branch ranges with BPF_EXITNaveen N. Rao
In some scenarios, it is possible that the program epilogue is outside the branch range for a BPF_EXIT instruction. Instead of rejecting such programs, emit epilogue as an alternate exit point from the program. Track the location of the same so that subsequent exits can take either of the two paths. Reported-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33aa2e92645a92712be23b18035a2c6dcb92ff8d.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-03-08powerpc/bpf: Emit a single branch instruction for known short branch rangesNaveen N. Rao
PPC_BCC() emits two instructions to accommodate scenarios where we need to branch outside the range of a conditional branch. PPC_BCC_SHORT() emits a single branch instruction and can be used when the branch is known to be within a conditional branch range. Convert some of the uses of PPC_BCC() in the powerpc BPF JIT over to PPC_BCC_SHORT() where we know the branch range. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edbca01377d1d5f472868bf6d8962b0a0d85b96f.1644834730.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-01-15powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06Naveen N. Rao
Johan reported the below crash with test_bpf on ppc64 e5500: test_bpf: #296 ALU_END_FROM_LE 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1] BE PAGE_SIZE=4K SMP NR_CPUS=24 QEMU e500 Modules linked in: test_bpf(+) CPU: 0 PID: 76 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty #1 NIP: 8000000000061c3c LR: 80000000006dea64 CTR: 8000000000061c18 REGS: c0000000032d3420 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-03771-g98c2059e008a-dirty) MSR: 0000000080089000 <EE,ME> CR: 88002822 XER: 20000000 IRQMASK: 0 <...> NIP [8000000000061c3c] 0x8000000000061c3c LR [80000000006dea64] .__run_one+0x104/0x17c [test_bpf] Call Trace: .__run_one+0x60/0x17c [test_bpf] (unreliable) .test_bpf_init+0x6a8/0xdc8 [test_bpf] .do_one_initcall+0x6c/0x28c .do_init_module+0x68/0x28c .load_module+0x2460/0x2abc .__do_sys_init_module+0x120/0x18c .system_call_exception+0x110/0x1b8 system_call_common+0xf0/0x210 --- interrupt: c00 at 0x101d0acc <...> ---[ end trace 47b2bf19090bb3d0 ]--- Illegal instruction The illegal instruction turned out to be 'ldbrx' emitted for BPF_FROM_[L|B]E, which was only introduced in ISA v2.06. Guard use of the same and implement an alternative approach for older processors. Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Reported-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d1e51c6fdf572062cf3009a751c3406bda01b832.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-01-15powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra passNaveen N. Rao
These instructions are updated after the initial JIT, so redo codegen during the extra pass. Rename bpf_jit_fixup_subprog_calls() to clarify that this is more than just subprog calls. Fixes: 69c087ba6225b5 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.15 Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7cc162af77ba918eb3ecd26ec9e7824bc44b1fae.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-01-14Merge tag 'powerpc-5.17-1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux Pull powerpc updates from Michael Ellerman: - Optimise radix KVM guest entry/exit by 2x on Power9/Power10. - Allow firmware to tell us whether to disable the entry and uaccess flushes on Power10 or later CPUs. - Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for 32 and 64-bit BPF jits. - Several fixes and improvements to our hard lockup watchdog. - Activate HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS on 32-bit. - Allow building the 64-bit Book3S kernel without hash MMU support, ie. Radix only. - Add KUAP (SMAP) support for 40x, 44x, 8xx, Book3E (64-bit). - Add new encodings for perf_mem_data_src.mem_hops field, and use them on Power10. - A series of small performance improvements to 64-bit interrupt entry. - Several commits fixing issues when building with the clang integrated assembler. - Many other small features and fixes. Thanks to Alan Modra, Alexey Kardashevskiy, Ammar Faizi, Anders Roxell, Arnd Bergmann, Athira Rajeev, Cédric Le Goater, Christophe JAILLET, Christophe Leroy, Christoph Hellwig, Daniel Axtens, David Yang, Erhard Furtner, Fabiano Rosas, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Guo Ren, Hari Bathini, Jason Wang, Joel Stanley, Julia Lawall, Kajol Jain, Kees Cook, Laurent Dufour, Madhavan Srinivasan, Mark Brown, Minghao Chi, Nageswara R Sastry, Naresh Kamboju, Nathan Chancellor, Nathan Lynch, Nicholas Piggin, Nick Child, Oliver O'Halloran, Peiwei Hu, Randy Dunlap, Ravi Bangoria, Rob Herring, Russell Currey, Sachin Sant, Sean Christopherson, Segher Boessenkool, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo, Tyrel Datwyler, Xiang wangx, and Yang Guang. * tag 'powerpc-5.17-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux: (240 commits) powerpc/xmon: Dump XIVE information for online-only processors. powerpc/opal: use default_groups in kobj_type powerpc/cacheinfo: use default_groups in kobj_type powerpc/sched: Remove unused TASK_SIZE_OF powerpc/xive: Add missing null check after calling kmalloc powerpc/floppy: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API selftests/powerpc: Add a test of sigreturning to an unaligned address powerpc/64s: Use EMIT_WARN_ENTRY for SRR debug warnings powerpc/64s: Mask NIP before checking against SRR0 powerpc/perf: Fix spelling of "its" powerpc/32: Fix boot failure with GCC latent entropy plugin powerpc/code-patching: Replace patch_instruction() by ppc_inst_write() in selftests powerpc/code-patching: Move code patching selftests in its own file powerpc/code-patching: Move instr_is_branch_{i/b}form() in code-patching.h powerpc/code-patching: Move patch_exception() outside code-patching.c powerpc/code-patching: Use test_trampoline for prefixed patch test powerpc/code-patching: Fix patch_branch() return on out-of-range failure powerpc/code-patching: Reorganise do_patch_instruction() to ease error handling powerpc/code-patching: Fix unmap_patch_area() error handling powerpc/code-patching: Fix error handling in do_patch_instruction() ...
2021-11-25bpf ppc64: Access only if addr is kernel addressRavi Bangoria
On PPC64 with KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to access userspace needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP. But that is not happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction. So, when BPF program tries to access invalid userspace address, page-fault handler considers it as bad KUAP fault: Kernel attempted to read user page (d0000000) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0) Considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID (which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer or NULL but should never be a pointer to userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM load only if addr is kernel address, otherwise set dst_reg=0 and move on. This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table. [Alexei suggested for x86] Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-7-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2021-11-25bpf ppc64: Add BPF_PROBE_MEM support for JITRavi Bangoria
BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions within BPF program. Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable sections within BPF program. fixup section contains two instructions, first instruction clears dest_reg and 2nd jumps to next instruction in the BPF code. extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of the instruction and 'fixup' field contains relative offset of the fixup entry. Example layout of BPF program with extable present: +------------------+ | | | | 0x4020 -->| ld r27,4(r3) | | | | | 0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r4) | | | | | |------------------| 0x4280 -->| li r27,0 | \ fixup entry | b 0x4024 | / 0x4288 -->| li r3,0 | | b 0x40b0 | |------------------| 0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry | fixup=0xffffffec | / 0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 | | fixup=0xffffffec | +------------------+ (Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real) Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2021-11-25bpf powerpc: refactor JIT compiler codeHari Bathini
Refactor powerpc LDX JITing code to simplify adding BPF_PROBE_MEM support. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2021-11-25bpf powerpc: Remove extra_pass from bpf_jit_build_body()Ravi Bangoria
In case of extra_pass, usual JIT passes are always skipped. So, extra_pass is always false while calling bpf_jit_build_body() and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123056.485795-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com
2021-11-16bpf: Change value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33Tiezhu Yang
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance. We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63 ("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is reasonable. After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can see there exists failed testcase. On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set: # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep -w FAIL Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL On some archs: # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep -w FAIL Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25 ("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code more readable. The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh. For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes, it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the JIT. Here are the test results on x86_64: # uname -m x86_64 # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #142 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
2021-10-07powerpc/bpf: Emit stf barrier instruction sequences for BPF_NOSPECNaveen N. Rao
Emit similar instruction sequences to commit a048a07d7f4535 ("powerpc/64s: Add support for a store forwarding barrier at kernel entry/exit") when encountering BPF_NOSPEC. Mitigations are enabled depending on what the firmware advertises. In particular, we do not gate these mitigations based on current settings, just like in x86. Due to this, we don't need to take any action if mitigations are enabled or disabled at runtime. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/956570cbc191cd41f8274bed48ee757a86dac62a.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2021-10-07powerpc/bpf: Fix BPF_SUB when imm == 0x80000000Naveen N. Rao
We aren't handling subtraction involving an immediate value of 0x80000000 properly. Fix the same. Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> [mpe: Fold in fix from Naveen to use imm <= 32768] Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fc4b1276eb10761fd7ce0814c8dd089da2815251.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2021-10-07powerpc/bpf: Fix BPF_MOD when imm == 1Naveen N. Rao
Only ignore the operation if dividing by 1. Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c674ca18c3046885602caebb326213731c675d06.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2021-10-07powerpc/bpf: Validate branch rangesNaveen N. Rao
Add checks to ensure that we never emit branch instructions with truncated branch offsets. Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/71d33a6b7603ec1013c9734dd8bdd4ff5e929142.1633464148.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2021-07-29bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4Daniel Borkmann
In case of JITs, each of the JIT backends compiles the BPF nospec instruction /either/ to a machine instruction which emits a speculation barrier /or/ to /no/ machine instruction in case the underlying architecture is not affected by Speculative Store Bypass or has different mitigations in place already. This covers both x86 and (implicitly) arm64: In case of x86, we use 'lfence' instruction for mitigation. In case of arm64, we rely on the firmware mitigation as controlled via the ssbd kernel parameter. Whenever the mitigation is enabled, it works for all of the kernel code with no need to provide any additional instructions here (hence only comment in arm64 JIT). Other archs can follow as needed. The BPF nospec instruction is specifically targeting Spectre v4 since i) we don't use a serialization barrier for the Spectre v1 case, and ii) mitigation instructions for v1 and v4 might be different on some archs. The BPF nospec is required for a future commit, where the BPF verifier does annotate intermediate BPF programs with speculation barriers. Co-developed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Co-developed-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Benedict Schlueter <benedict.schlueter@rub.de> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2021-07-05powerpc/bpf: Fix detecting BPF atomic instructionsNaveen N. Rao
Commit 91c960b0056672 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm") converted BPF_XADD to BPF_ATOMIC and added a way to distinguish instructions based on the immediate field. Existing JIT implementations were updated to check for the immediate field and to reject programs utilizing anything more than BPF_ADD (such as BPF_FETCH) in the immediate field. However, the check added to powerpc64 JIT did not look at the correct BPF instruction. Due to this, such programs would be accepted and incorrectly JIT'ed resulting in soft lockups, as seen with the atomic bounds test. Fix this by looking at the correct immediate value. Fixes: 91c960b0056672 ("bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm") Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4117b430ffaa8cd7af042496f87fd7539e4f17fd.1625145429.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2021-06-25powerpc/bpf: Use bctrl for making function callsNaveen N. Rao
blrl corrupts the link stack. Instead use bctrl when making function calls from BPF programs. Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210609090024.1446800-1-naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2021-06-16powerpc/ebpf64: Use PPC_RAW_MFLR()Christophe Leroy
Use PPC_RAW_MFLR() instead of open coding with PPC_INST_MFLR. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c1887623e91e8b4da36e669e4c74de86320a5092.1621506159.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-04-03powerpc/bpf: Reallocate BPF registers to volatile registers when possible on ↵Christophe Leroy
PPC32 When the BPF routine doesn't call any function, the non volatile registers can be reallocated to volatile registers in order to avoid having to save them/restore on the stack. Before this patch, the test #359 ADD default X is: 0: 7c 64 1b 78 mr r4,r3 4: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 8: 94 21 ff b0 stwu r1,-80(r1) c: 60 00 00 00 nop 10: 92 e1 00 2c stw r23,44(r1) 14: 93 01 00 30 stw r24,48(r1) 18: 93 21 00 34 stw r25,52(r1) 1c: 93 41 00 38 stw r26,56(r1) 20: 39 80 00 00 li r12,0 24: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0 28: 3b 40 00 00 li r26,0 2c: 3b 20 00 00 li r25,0 30: 7c 98 23 78 mr r24,r4 34: 7c 77 1b 78 mr r23,r3 38: 39 80 00 42 li r12,66 3c: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0 40: 7d 8c d2 14 add r12,r12,r26 44: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0 48: 7d 83 63 78 mr r3,r12 4c: 82 e1 00 2c lwz r23,44(r1) 50: 83 01 00 30 lwz r24,48(r1) 54: 83 21 00 34 lwz r25,52(r1) 58: 83 41 00 38 lwz r26,56(r1) 5c: 38 21 00 50 addi r1,r1,80 60: 4e 80 00 20 blr After this patch, the same test has become: 0: 7c 64 1b 78 mr r4,r3 4: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 8: 94 21 ff b0 stwu r1,-80(r1) c: 60 00 00 00 nop 10: 39 80 00 00 li r12,0 14: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0 18: 39 00 00 00 li r8,0 1c: 38 e0 00 00 li r7,0 20: 7c 86 23 78 mr r6,r4 24: 7c 65 1b 78 mr r5,r3 28: 39 80 00 42 li r12,66 2c: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0 30: 7d 8c 42 14 add r12,r12,r8 34: 39 60 00 00 li r11,0 38: 7d 83 63 78 mr r3,r12 3c: 38 21 00 50 addi r1,r1,80 40: 4e 80 00 20 blr Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b94562d7d2bb21aec89de0c40bb3cd91054b65a2.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-04-03powerpc/bpf: Move common functions into bpf_jit_comp.cChristophe Leroy
Move into bpf_jit_comp.c the functions that will remain common to PPC64 and PPC32 when we add support of EBPF for PPC32. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2c339d77fb168ef12b213ccddfee3cb6c8ce8ae1.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-04-03powerpc/bpf: Move common helpers into bpf_jit.hChristophe Leroy
Move functions bpf_flush_icache(), bpf_is_seen_register() and bpf_set_seen_register() in order to reuse them in future bpf_jit_comp32.c Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/28e8d5a75e64807d7e9d39a4b52658755e259f8c.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-04-03powerpc/bpf: Change register numbering for bpf_set/is_seen_register()Christophe Leroy
Instead of using BPF register number as input in functions bpf_set_seen_register() and bpf_is_seen_register(), use CPU register number directly. Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0cd2506f598e7095ea43e62dca1f472de5474a0d.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
2021-01-14bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .immBrendan Jackman
A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with the immediate discriminating different operations. In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD. This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero. All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
2020-07-16powerpc/ppc-opcode: Consolidate powerpc instructions from bpf_jit.hBalamuruhan S
Move macro definitions of powerpc instructions from bpf_jit.h to ppc-opcode.h and adopt the users of the macros accordingly. `PPC_MR()` is defined twice in bpf_jit.h, remove the duplicate one. Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624113038.908074-5-bala24@linux.ibm.com
2020-07-16powerpc/bpf_jit: Reuse instruction macros from ppc-opcode.hBalamuruhan S
Remove duplicate macro definitions from bpf_jit.h and reuse the macros from ppc-opcode.h Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624113038.908074-4-bala24@linux.ibm.com
2019-11-02powerpc/bpf: Fix tail call implementationEric Dumazet
We have seen many crashes on powerpc hosts while loading bpf programs. The problem here is that bpf_int_jit_compile() does a first pass to compute the program length. Then it allocates memory to store the generated program and calls bpf_jit_build_body() a second time (and a third time later) What I have observed is that the second bpf_jit_build_body() could end up using few more words than expected. If bpf_jit_binary_alloc() put the space for the program at the end of the allocated page, we then write on a non mapped memory. It appears that bpf_jit_emit_tail_call() calls bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue() while ctx->seen might not be stable. Only after the second pass we can be sure ctx->seen wont be changed. Trying to avoid a second pass seems quite complex and probably not worth it. Fixes: ce0761419faef ("powerpc/bpf: Implement support for tail calls") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191101033444.143741-1-edumazet@google.com
2019-06-17Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netDavid S. Miller
Honestly all the conflicts were simple overlapping changes, nothing really interesting to report. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-06-17Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/netLinus Torvalds
Pull networking fixes from David Miller: "Lots of bug fixes here: 1) Out of bounds access in __bpf_skc_lookup, from Lorenz Bauer. 2) Fix rate reporting in cfg80211_calculate_bitrate_he(), from John Crispin. 3) Use after free in psock backlog workqueue, from John Fastabend. 4) Fix source port matching in fdb peer flow rule of mlx5, from Raed Salem. 5) Use atomic_inc_not_zero() in fl6_sock_lookup(), from Eric Dumazet. 6) Network header needs to be set for packet redirect in nfp, from John Hurley. 7) Fix udp zerocopy refcnt, from Willem de Bruijn. 8) Don't assume linear buffers in vxlan and geneve error handlers, from Stefano Brivio. 9) Fix TOS matching in mlxsw, from Jiri Pirko. 10) More SCTP cookie memory leak fixes, from Neil Horman. 11) Fix VLAN filtering in rtl8366, from Linus Walluij. 12) Various TCP SACK payload size and fragmentation memory limit fixes from Eric Dumazet. 13) Use after free in pneigh_get_next(), also from Eric Dumazet. 14) LAPB control block leak fix from Jeremy Sowden" * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net: (145 commits) lapb: fixed leak of control-blocks. tipc: purge deferredq list for each grp member in tipc_group_delete ax25: fix inconsistent lock state in ax25_destroy_timer neigh: fix use-after-free read in pneigh_get_next tcp: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL hv_sock: Suppress bogus "may be used uninitialized" warnings be2net: Fix number of Rx queues used for flow hashing net: handle 802.1P vlan 0 packets properly tcp: enforce tcp_min_snd_mss in tcp_mtu_probing() tcp: add tcp_min_snd_mss sysctl tcp: tcp_fragment() should apply sane memory limits tcp: limit payload size of sacked skbs Revert "net: phylink: set the autoneg state in phylink_phy_change" bpf: fix nested bpf tracepoints with per-cpu data bpf: Fix out of bounds memory access in bpf_sk_storage vsock/virtio: set SOCK_DONE on peer shutdown net: dsa: rtl8366: Fix up VLAN filtering net: phylink: set the autoneg state in phylink_phy_change net: add high_order_alloc_disable sysctl/static key tcp: add tcp_tx_skb_cache sysctl ...
2019-06-13powerpc/bpf: use unsigned division instruction for 64-bit operationsNaveen N. Rao
BPF_ALU64 div/mod operations are currently using signed division, unlike BPF_ALU32 operations. Fix the same. DIV64 and MOD64 overflow tests pass with this fix. Fixes: 156d0e290e969c ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+ Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-06-05treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441Thomas Gleixner
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-05-24powerpc: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-genJiong Wang
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-03-16powerpc: bpf: Fix generation of load/store DW instructionsNaveen N. Rao
Yauheni Kaliuta pointed out that PTR_TO_STACK store/load verifier test was failing on powerpc64 BE, and rightfully indicated that the PPC_LD() macro is not masking away the last two bits of the offset per the ISA, resulting in the generation of 'lwa' instruction instead of the intended 'ld' instruction. Segher also pointed out that we can't simply mask away the last two bits as that will result in loading/storing from/to a memory location that was not intended. This patch addresses this by using ldx/stdx if the offset is not word-aligned. We load the offset into a temporary register (TMP_REG_2) and use that as the index register in a subsequent ldx/stdx. We fix PPC_LD() macro to mask off the last two bits, but enhance PPC_BPF_LL() and PPC_BPF_STL() to factor in the offset value and generate the proper instruction sequence. We also convert all existing users of PPC_LD() and PPC_STD() to use these macros. All existing uses of these macros have been audited to ensure that TMP_REG_2 can be clobbered. Fixes: 156d0e290e96 ("powerpc/ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.9+ Reported-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-07-29 17:50:20 +0000