Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
VDSO time functions do not call any other function, so they don't
need to save/restore LR. However, retrieving the address of VDSO data
page requires using LR hence saving then restoring it, which can be
heavy on some CPUs. On the other hand, VDSO functions on powerpc are
not standard functions and require a wrapper function to call C VDSO
functions. And that wrapper has to save and restore LR in order to
call the C VDSO function, so retrieving VDSO data page address in that
wrapper doesn't require additional save/restore of LR.
For random VDSO functions it is a bit different. Because the function
calls __arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack(), it saves and restores LR.
Retrieving VDSO data page address can then be done there without
additional save/restore of LR.
So lets implement __arch_get_vdso_rng_data() and simplify the wrapper.
It starts paving the way for the day powerpc will implement a more
standard ABI for VDSO functions.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/a1a9bd0df508f1b5c04684b7366940577dfc6262.1727858295.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
The page containing VDSO time data is swapped with the one containing
TIME namespace data when a process uses a non-root time namespace.
For other data like powerpc specific data and RNG data, it means
tracking whether time namespace is the root one or not to know which
page to use.
Simplify the logic behind by moving time data out of first data page
so that the first data page which contains everything else always
remains the first page. Time data is in the second or third page
depending on selected time namespace.
While we are playing with get_datapage macro, directly take into
account the data offset inside the macro instead of adding that offset
afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/0557d3ec898c1d0ea2fc59fa8757618e524c5d94.1727858295.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
|
|
Extend getrandom() vDSO implementation to VDSO64.
Tested on QEMU on both ppc64_defconfig and ppc64le_defconfig.
Results from a Power9 (PowerNV):
~ # ./vdso_test_getrandom bench-single
vdso: 25000000 times in 0.787943615 seconds
libc: 25000000 times in 14.101887252 seconds
syscall: 25000000 times in 14.047475082 seconds
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Tested-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
To be consistent with other VDSO functions, the function is called
__kernel_getrandom()
__arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack() fonction is implemented basically
with 32 bits operations. It performs 4 QUARTERROUND operations in
parallele. There are enough registers to avoid using the stack:
On input:
r3: output bytes
r4: 32-byte key input
r5: 8-byte counter input/output
r6: number of 64-byte blocks to write to output
During operation:
stack: pointer to counter (r5) and non-volatile registers (r14-131)
r0: counter of blocks (initialised with r6)
r4: Value '4' after key has been read, used for indexing
r5-r12: key
r14-r15: block counter
r16-r31: chacha state
At the end:
r0, r6-r12: Zeroised
r5, r14-r31: Restored
Performance on powerpc 885 (using kernel selftest):
~# ./vdso_test_getrandom bench-single
vdso: 25000000 times in 62.938002291 seconds
libc: 25000000 times in 535.581916866 seconds
syscall: 25000000 times in 531.525042806 seconds
Performance on powerpc 8321 (using kernel selftest):
~# ./vdso_test_getrandom bench-single
vdso: 25000000 times in 16.899318858 seconds
libc: 25000000 times in 131.050596522 seconds
syscall: 25000000 times in 129.794790389 seconds
This first patch adds support for VDSO32. As selftests cannot easily
be generated only for VDSO32, and because the following patch brings
support for VDSO64 anyway, this patch opts out all code in
__arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack() so that vdso_test_chacha will not
fail to compile and will not crash on PPC64/PPC64LE, allthough the
selftest itself will fail.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|