diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/helpers.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 78 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 72 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index 8980f6859443..6be16db9f188 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> #include <linux/poison.h> #include <linux/proc_ns.h> +#include <linux/sched/task.h> #include <linux/security.h> #include <linux/btf_ids.h> #include <linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h> @@ -2013,73 +2014,8 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_first(struct bpf_rb_root *root) */ __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) { - return get_task_struct(p); -} - -/** - * bpf_task_acquire_not_zero - Acquire a reference to a rcu task object. A task - * acquired by this kfunc which is not stored in a map as a kptr, must be - * released by calling bpf_task_release(). - * @p: The task on which a reference is being acquired. - */ -__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire_not_zero(struct task_struct *p) -{ - /* For the time being this function returns NULL, as it's not currently - * possible to safely acquire a reference to a task with RCU protection - * using get_task_struct() and put_task_struct(). This is due to the - * slightly odd mechanics of p->rcu_users, and how task RCU protection - * works. - * - * A struct task_struct is refcounted by two different refcount_t - * fields: - * - * 1. p->usage: The "true" refcount field which tracks a task's - * lifetime. The task is freed as soon as this - * refcount drops to 0. - * - * 2. p->rcu_users: An "RCU users" refcount field which is statically - * initialized to 2, and is co-located in a union with - * a struct rcu_head field (p->rcu). p->rcu_users - * essentially encapsulates a single p->usage - * refcount, and when p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU - * callback is scheduled on the struct rcu_head which - * decrements the p->usage refcount. - * - * There are two important implications to this task refcounting logic - * described above. The first is that - * refcount_inc_not_zero(&p->rcu_users) cannot be used anywhere, as - * after the refcount goes to 0, the RCU callback being scheduled will - * cause the memory backing the refcount to again be nonzero due to the - * fields sharing a union. The other is that we can't rely on RCU to - * guarantee that a task is valid in a BPF program. This is because a - * task could have already transitioned to being in the TASK_DEAD - * state, had its rcu_users refcount go to 0, and its rcu callback - * invoked in which it drops its single p->usage reference. At this - * point the task will be freed as soon as the last p->usage reference - * goes to 0, without waiting for another RCU gp to elapse. The only - * way that a BPF program can guarantee that a task is valid is in this - * scenario is to hold a p->usage refcount itself. - * - * Until we're able to resolve this issue, either by pulling - * p->rcu_users and p->rcu out of the union, or by getting rid of - * p->usage and just using p->rcu_users for refcounting, we'll just - * return NULL here. - */ - return NULL; -} - -/** - * bpf_task_kptr_get - Acquire a reference on a struct task_struct kptr. A task - * kptr acquired by this kfunc which is not subsequently stored in a map, must - * be released by calling bpf_task_release(). - * @pp: A pointer to a task kptr on which a reference is being acquired. - */ -__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_kptr_get(struct task_struct **pp) -{ - /* We must return NULL here until we have clarity on how to properly - * leverage RCU for ensuring a task's lifetime. See the comment above - * in bpf_task_acquire_not_zero() for more details. - */ + if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&p->rcu_users)) + return p; return NULL; } @@ -2089,7 +2025,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_kptr_get(struct task_struct **pp) */ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) { - put_task_struct(p); + put_task_struct_rcu_user(p); } #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS @@ -2199,7 +2135,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_from_pid(s32 pid) rcu_read_lock(); p = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns); if (p) - bpf_task_acquire(p); + p = bpf_task_acquire(p); rcu_read_unlock(); return p; @@ -2371,9 +2307,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_front) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_front, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_back, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL) -BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS) -BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire_not_zero, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RCU | KF_RET_NULL) -BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_kptr_get, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_KPTR_GET | KF_RET_NULL) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RCU | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_release, KF_RELEASE) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rbtree_remove, KF_ACQUIRE) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rbtree_add) |