summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2023-09-25 16:37:45 -0700
committerAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2023-09-25 16:37:53 -0700
commit0e73ef1d8c09a1f21ca2b19684819dbbcdce00f9 (patch)
treec693b65caa5a8a700c04677fcce5e8db95a7a706 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
parente0fa6523e02ab31a27daf52e58a0d95fd52d5300 (diff)
parent85981e0f9e9fc882578f0ad7488d6c59193dd187 (diff)
Merge branch 'bpf: Add missed stats for kprobes'
Jiri Olsa says: ==================== hi, at the moment we can't retrieve the number of missed kprobe executions and subsequent execution of BPF programs. This patchset adds: - counting of missed execution on attach layer for: . kprobes attached through perf link (kprobe/ftrace) . kprobes attached through kprobe.multi link (fprobe) - counting of recursion_misses for BPF kprobe programs It's still technically possible to create kprobe without perf link (using SET_BPF perf ioctl) in which case we don't have a way to retrieve the kprobe's 'missed' count. However both libbpf and cilium/ebpf libraries use perf link if it's available, and for old kernels without perf link support we can use BPF program to retrieve the kprobe missed count. v3 changes: - added acks [Song] - make test_missed not serial [Andrii] Also available at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git bpf/missed_stats thanks, jirka ==================== Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c5
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index cefc5dd72573..a5e246f7b202 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it)
it->cnt = 0;
}
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_common_test(void)
+{
+}
+
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 {
int a;
};
@@ -343,6 +347,7 @@ BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new, KF_ITER_NEW)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_common_test)
BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set = {