wifi: rtw89: remove consumers of driver mutex

All need lock have taken both driver mutex and wiphy lock, so we can remove
driver mutex safely by below spatch script. Also, check every
lockdep_assert_wiphy() is executed without locks warning at runtime.

@ rule1_1 @
@@

- lockdep_assert_held(&rtwdev->mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);

@ rule1_2 @
@@

- guard(mutex)(&rtwdev->mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);

@ rule2_1 @
@@

- mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
  ...
- mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);

@ rule2_2 @
@@

- mutex_unlock(&rtwdev->mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
  ...
- mutex_lock(&rtwdev->mutex);

@ rule3_1 @
type t;
identifier fn;
@@
  t fn(struct wiphy *wiphy, ...)
  {
  ...
- lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(wiphy);
  ...
  }

@ rule3_1_1 @
type t;
identifier fn;
@@
  t fn(...)
  {
  ...
  struct wiphy *wiphy = ...;
  ...
- lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(wiphy);
  ...
  }

@ rule3_2 @
type t;
identifier fn;
@@
  t fn(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, ...)
  {
  ...
- lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(hw->wiphy);
  ...
  }

@ rule3_2_1 @
type t;
identifier fn;
@@
  t fn(...)
  {
  ...
  struct ieee80211_hw *hw = ...;
  ...
- lockdep_assert_wiphy(rtwdev->hw->wiphy);
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(hw->wiphy);
  ...
  }

The compiler warnings will be fixed manually by latter patch:

  rtw89/mac80211.c:371:1: warning: statement expected after label

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250122060310.31976-8-pkshih@realtek.com

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions