perf dso: Minor refactor to allow clang's Wthread-safety analysis

The pattern:

```
if (x) {
   lock(...)
}
block1;
if (x) {
   unlock(...)
}
```

defeats clang's -Wthread-safety analysis where it complains of locks
held on one path and not another.

Add helper functions for "block1" then restructure as:

```
if (x) {
   lock(...);
   block1();
   unlock(...);
} else {
   block1();
}
```

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Cc: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
Cc: Fei Lang <langfei@huawei.com>
Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250519224645.1810891-1-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions