diff options
author | Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> | 2022-07-05 12:00:18 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2022-07-07 16:35:21 +0200 |
commit | 2b4b2621fd6401865b31b9f403e4b936b7439e94 (patch) | |
tree | fa77994c04a9e5317a655a39f7f11cfbf64ee493 /net/unix/af_unix.c | |
parent | 935dc35c75318fa213d26808ad8bb130fb0b486e (diff) |
selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage RCU Tasks Trace usage
This benchmark measures grace period latency and kthread cpu usage of
RCU Tasks Trace when many processes are creating/deleting BPF
local_storage. Intent here is to quantify improvement on these metrics
after Paul's recent RCU Tasks patches [0].
Specifically, fork 15k tasks which call a bpf prog that creates/destroys
task local_storage and sleep in a loop, resulting in many
call_rcu_tasks_trace calls.
To determine grace period latency, trace time elapsed between
rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step and rcu_tasks_trace_postgp; for cpu usage
look at rcu_task_trace_kthread's stime in /proc/PID/stat.
On my virtualized test environment (Skylake, 8 cpus) benchmark results
demonstrate significant improvement:
BEFORE Paul's patches:
SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency avg 22298.551 us stddev 1302.165 us
SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period avg 2.291 stddev 0.324
AFTER Paul's patches:
SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency avg 16969.197 us stddev 2525.053 us
SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period avg 1.146 stddev 0.178
Note that since these patches are not in bpf-next benchmarking was done
by cherry-picking this patch onto rcu tree.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20220620225402.GA3842369@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220705190018.3239050-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'net/unix/af_unix.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions