diff options
| author | Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com> | 2025-03-26 13:42:07 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.com> | 2025-03-26 13:42:07 +0100 |
| commit | b3cc7428a32202936904b5b07cf9f135025bafd6 (patch) | |
| tree | d4a1a6180ac5939fccd92acd6f8d7d1388575c4a /lib/list_debug.c | |
| parent | db52926fb0be40e1d588a346df73f5ea3a34a4c6 (diff) | |
| parent | 01601fdd40ecf4467c8ae4d215dbb7d2a0599a2c (diff) | |
Merge branch 'for-6.15/amd_sfh' into for-linus
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Some platforms include a human presence detection (HPD) sensor. When
enabled and a user is detected a wake event will be emitted from the
sensor fusion hub that software can react to.
Example use cases are "wake from suspend on approach" or to "lock
when leaving".
This is currently enabled by default on supported systems, but users
can't control it. This essentially means that wake on approach is
enabled which is a really surprising behavior to users that don't
expect it.
Instead of defaulting to enabled add a sysfs knob that users can
use to enable the feature if desirable and set it to disabled by
default.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/list_debug.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/list_debug.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c index db602417febf0..ee7eeeb8f92cd 100644 --- a/lib/list_debug.c +++ b/lib/list_debug.c @@ -22,17 +22,17 @@ __list_valid_slowpath bool __list_add_valid_or_report(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev, struct list_head *next) { - if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL, + if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL, NULL, "list_add corruption. prev is NULL.\n") || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL, NULL, "list_add corruption. next is NULL.\n") || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev, next, "list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n", prev, next->prev, next) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next, prev, "list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n", next, prev->next, prev) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next, NULL, "list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n", new, prev, next)) return false; @@ -49,20 +49,20 @@ bool __list_del_entry_valid_or_report(struct list_head *entry) prev = entry->prev; next = entry->next; - if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL, + if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == NULL, NULL, "list_del corruption, %px->next is NULL\n", entry) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == NULL, NULL, "list_del corruption, %px->prev is NULL\n", entry) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1, next, "list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n", entry, LIST_POISON1) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2, prev, "list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n", entry, LIST_POISON2) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry, prev, "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px. (prev=%px)\n", entry, prev->next, prev) || - CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry, + CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry, next, "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px. (next=%px)\n", entry, next->prev, next)) return false; |