Merge 6.15-rc4 into char-misc-next

We need the char-misc fixes in here as well.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index a47bcf71defc..9a3859443c04 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ void tick_resume(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
 static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tick_freeze_lock);
+static DEFINE_WAIT_OVERRIDE_MAP(tick_freeze_map, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
 static unsigned int tick_freeze_depth;
 
 /**
@@ -528,9 +529,22 @@ void tick_freeze(void)
 	if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) {
 		trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
 				     smp_processor_id(), true);
+		/*
+		 * All other CPUs have their interrupts disabled and are
+		 * suspended to idle. Other tasks have been frozen so there
+		 * is no scheduling happening. This means that there is no
+		 * concurrency in the system at this point. Therefore it is
+		 * okay to acquire a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT, such as a
+		 * spinlock, because the lock cannot be held by other CPUs
+		 * or threads and acquiring it cannot block.
+		 *
+		 * Inform lockdep about the situation.
+		 */
+		lock_map_acquire_try(&tick_freeze_map);
 		system_state = SYSTEM_SUSPEND;
 		sched_clock_suspend();
 		timekeeping_suspend();
+		lock_map_release(&tick_freeze_map);
 	} else {
 		tick_suspend_local();
 	}
@@ -552,8 +566,16 @@ void tick_unfreeze(void)
 	raw_spin_lock(&tick_freeze_lock);
 
 	if (tick_freeze_depth == num_online_cpus()) {
+		/*
+		 * Similar to tick_freeze(). On resumption the first CPU may
+		 * acquire uncontended sleeping locks while other CPUs block on
+		 * tick_freeze_lock.
+		 */
+		lock_map_acquire_try(&tick_freeze_map);
 		timekeeping_resume();
 		sched_clock_resume();
+		lock_map_release(&tick_freeze_map);
+
 		system_state = SYSTEM_RUNNING;
 		trace_suspend_resume(TPS("timekeeping_freeze"),
 				     smp_processor_id(), false);