Merge tag 'v3.5-rc4' into drm-intel-next-queued

I want to merge the "no more fake agp on gen6+" patches into
drm-intel-next (well, the last pieces). But a patch in 3.5-rc4 also
adds a new use of dev->agp. Hence the backmarge to sort this out, for
otherwise drm-intel-next merged into Linus' tree would conflict in the
relevant code, things would compile but nicely OOPS at driver load :(

Conflicts in this merge are just simple cases of "both branches
changed/added lines at the same place". The only tricky part is to
keep the order correct wrt the unwind code in case of errors in
intel_ringbuffer.c (and the MI_DISPLAY_FLIP #defines in i915_reg.h
together, obviously).

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c

Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..82d1c794066d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/task_work.h>
+#include <linux/tracehook.h>
+
+int
+task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct task_work *twork, bool notify)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int err = -ESRCH;
+
+#ifndef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME
+	if (notify)
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+#endif
+	/*
+	 * We must not insert the new work if the task has already passed
+	 * exit_task_work(). We rely on do_exit()->raw_spin_unlock_wait()
+	 * and check PF_EXITING under pi_lock.
+	 */
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+	if (likely(!(task->flags & PF_EXITING))) {
+		hlist_add_head(&twork->hlist, &task->task_works);
+		err = 0;
+	}
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	/* test_and_set_bit() implies mb(), see tracehook_notify_resume(). */
+	if (likely(!err) && notify)
+		set_notify_resume(task);
+	return err;
+}
+
+struct task_work *
+task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct task_work *twork;
+	struct hlist_node *pos;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+	hlist_for_each_entry(twork, pos, &task->task_works, hlist) {
+		if (twork->func == func) {
+			hlist_del(&twork->hlist);
+			goto found;
+		}
+	}
+	twork = NULL;
+ found:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	return twork;
+}
+
+void task_work_run(void)
+{
+	struct task_struct *task = current;
+	struct hlist_head task_works;
+	struct hlist_node *pos;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
+	hlist_move_list(&task->task_works, &task_works);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock);
+
+	if (unlikely(hlist_empty(&task_works)))
+		return;
+	/*
+	 * We use hlist to save the space in task_struct, but we want fifo.
+	 * Find the last entry, the list should be short, then process them
+	 * in reverse order.
+	 */
+	for (pos = task_works.first; pos->next; pos = pos->next)
+		;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		struct hlist_node **pprev = pos->pprev;
+		struct task_work *twork = container_of(pos, struct task_work,
+							hlist);
+		twork->func(twork);
+
+		if (pprev == &task_works.first)
+			break;
+		pos = container_of(pprev, struct hlist_node, next);
+	}
+}