Merge branch 'bpf-token-and-bpf-fs-based-delegation'

Andrii Nakryiko says:

====================
BPF token and BPF FS-based delegation

This patch set introduces an ability to delegate a subset of BPF subsystem
functionality from privileged system-wide daemon (e.g., systemd or any other
container manager) through special mount options for userns-bound BPF FS to
a *trusted* unprivileged application. Trust is the key here. This
functionality is not about allowing unconditional unprivileged BPF usage.
Establishing trust, though, is completely up to the discretion of respective
privileged application that would create and mount a BPF FS instance with
delegation enabled, as different production setups can and do achieve it
through a combination of different means (signing, LSM, code reviews, etc),
and it's undesirable and infeasible for kernel to enforce any particular way
of validating trustworthiness of particular process.

The main motivation for this work is a desire to enable containerized BPF
applications to be used together with user namespaces. This is currently
impossible, as CAP_BPF, required for BPF subsystem usage, cannot be namespaced
or sandboxed, as a general rule. E.g., tracing BPF programs, thanks to BPF
helpers like bpf_probe_read_kernel() and bpf_probe_read_user() can safely read
arbitrary memory, and it's impossible to ensure that they only read memory of
processes belonging to any given namespace. This means that it's impossible to
have a mechanically verifiable namespace-aware CAP_BPF capability, and as such
another mechanism to allow safe usage of BPF functionality is necessary.BPF FS
delegation mount options and BPF token derived from such BPF FS instance is
such a mechanism. Kernel makes no assumption about what "trusted" constitutes
in any particular case, and it's up to specific privileged applications and
their surrounding infrastructure to decide that. What kernel provides is a set
of APIs to setup and mount special BPF FS instanecs and derive BPF tokens from
it. BPF FS and BPF token are both bound to its owning userns and in such a way
are constrained inside intended container. Users can then pass BPF token FD to
privileged bpf() syscall commands, like BPF map creation and BPF program
loading, to perform such operations without having init userns privileged.

This version incorporates feedback and suggestions ([3]) received on v3 of
this patch set, and instead of allowing to create BPF tokens directly assuming
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), we instead enhance BPF FS to accept a few new
delegation mount options. If these options are used and BPF FS itself is
properly created, set up, and mounted inside the user namespaced container,
user application is able to derive a BPF token object from BPF FS instance,
and pass that token to bpf() syscall. As explained in patch #3, BPF token
itself doesn't grant access to BPF functionality, but instead allows kernel to
do namespaced capabilities checks (ns_capable() vs capable()) for CAP_BPF,
CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, and CAP_SYS_ADMIN, as applicable. So it forms one
half of a puzzle and allows container managers and sys admins to have safe and
flexible configuration options: determining which containers get delegation of
BPF functionality through BPF FS, and then which applications within such
containers are allowed to perform bpf() commands, based on namespaces
capabilities.

Previous attempt at addressing this very same problem ([0]) attempted to
utilize authoritative LSM approach, but was conclusively rejected by upstream
LSM maintainers. BPF token concept is not changing anything about LSM
approach, but can be combined with LSM hooks for very fine-grained security
policy. Some ideas about making BPF token more convenient to use with LSM (in
particular custom BPF LSM programs) was briefly described in recent LSF/MM/BPF
2023 presentation ([1]). E.g., an ability to specify user-provided data
(context), which in combination with BPF LSM would allow implementing a very
dynamic and fine-granular custom security policies on top of BPF token. In the
interest of minimizing API surface area and discussions this was relegated to
follow up patches, as it's not essential to the fundamental concept of
delegatable BPF token.

It should be noted that BPF token is conceptually quite similar to the idea of
/dev/bpf device file, proposed by Song a while ago ([2]). The biggest
difference is the idea of using virtual anon_inode file to hold BPF token and
allowing multiple independent instances of them, each (potentially) with its
own set of restrictions. And also, crucially, BPF token approach is not using
any special stateful task-scoped flags. Instead, bpf() syscall accepts
token_fd parameters explicitly for each relevant BPF command. This addresses
main concerns brought up during the /dev/bpf discussion, and fits better with
overall BPF subsystem design.

This patch set adds a basic minimum of functionality to make BPF token idea
useful and to discuss API and functionality. Currently only low-level libbpf
APIs support creating and passing BPF token around, allowing to test kernel
functionality, but for the most part is not sufficient for real-world
applications, which typically use high-level libbpf APIs based on `struct
bpf_object` type. This was done with the intent to limit the size of patch set
and concentrate on mostly kernel-side changes. All the necessary plumbing for
libbpf will be sent as a separate follow up patch set kernel support makes it
upstream.

Another part that should happen once kernel-side BPF token is established, is
a set of conventions between applications (e.g., systemd), tools (e.g.,
bpftool), and libraries (e.g., libbpf) on exposing delegatable BPF FS
instance(s) at well-defined locations to allow applications take advantage of
this in automatic fashion without explicit code changes on BPF application's
side. But I'd like to postpone this discussion to after BPF token concept
lands.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412043300.360803-1-andrii@kernel.org/
  [1] http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2023_material/Trusted_unprivileged_BPF_LSFMM2023.pdf
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190627201923.2589391-2-songliubraving@fb.com/
  [3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/

v11->v12:
  - enforce exact userns match in bpf_token_capable() and
    bpf_token_allow_cmd() checks, for added strictness (Christian);
v10->v11:
  - fix BPF FS root check to disallow using bind-mounted subdirectory of BPF
    FS instance (Christian);
  - further restrict BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command to be executed from inside
    exactly the same user namespace as the one used to create BPF FS instance
    (Christian);
v9->v10:
  - slight adjustments in LSM parts (Paul);
  - setting delegate_xxx  options require capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) (Christian);
  - simplify BPF_TOKEN_CREATE UAPI by accepting BPF FS FD directly (Christian);
v8->v9:
  - fix issue in selftests due to sys/mount.h header (Jiri);
  - fix warning in doc comments in LSM hooks (kernel test robot);
v7->v8:
  - add bpf_token_allow_cmd and bpf_token_capable hooks (Paul);
  - inline bpf_token_alloc() into bpf_token_create() to prevent accidental
    divergence with security_bpf_token_create() hook (Paul);
v6->v7:
  - separate patches to refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_map_alloc LSM hooks, as
    discussed with Paul, and now they also accept struct bpf_token;
  - added bpf_token_create/bpf_token_free to allow LSMs (SELinux,
    specifically) to set up security LSM blob (Paul);
  - last patch also wires bpf_security_struct setup by SELinux, similar to how
    it's done for BPF map/prog, though I'm not sure if that's enough, so worst
    case it's easy to drop this patch if more full fledged SELinux
    implementation will be done separately;
  - small fixes for issues caught by code reviews (Jiri, Hou);
  - fix for test_maps test that doesn't use LIBBPF_OPTS() macro (CI);
v5->v6:
  - fix possible use of uninitialized variable in selftests (CI);
  - don't use anon_inode, instead create one from BPF FS instance (Christian);
  - don't store bpf_token inside struct bpf_map, instead pass it explicitly to
    map_check_btf(). We do store bpf_token inside prog->aux, because it's used
    during verification and even can be checked during attach time for some
    program types;
  - LSM hooks are left intact pending the conclusion of discussion with Paul
    Moore; I'd prefer to do LSM-related changes as a follow up patch set
    anyways;
v4->v5:
  - add pre-patch unifying CAP_NET_ADMIN handling inside kernel/bpf/syscall.c
    (Paul Moore);
  - fix build warnings and errors in selftests and kernel, detected by CI and
    kernel test robot;
v3->v4:
  - add delegation mount options to BPF FS;
  - BPF token is derived from the instance of BPF FS and associates itself
    with BPF FS' owning userns;
  - BPF token doesn't grant BPF functionality directly, it just turns
    capable() checks into ns_capable() checks within BPF FS' owning user;
  - BPF token cannot be pinned;
v2->v3:
  - make BPF_TOKEN_CREATE pin created BPF token in BPF FS, and disallow
    BPF_OBJ_PIN for BPF token;
v1->v2:
  - fix build failures on Kconfig with CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL unset;
  - drop BPF_F_TOKEN_UNKNOWN_* flags and simplify UAPI (Stanislav).
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 159 insertions, 56 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ebaccf77d56e..aff045eed375 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -1009,8 +1009,8 @@ int map_check_no_btf(const struct bpf_map *map,
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
 
-static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
-			 u32 btf_key_id, u32 btf_value_id)
+static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_token *token,
+			 const struct btf *btf, u32 btf_key_id, u32 btf_value_id)
 {
 	const struct btf_type *key_type, *value_type;
 	u32 key_size, value_size;
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ static int map_check_btf(struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
 	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(map->record)) {
 		int i;
 
-		if (!bpf_capable()) {
+		if (!bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_BPF)) {
 			ret = -EPERM;
 			goto free_map_tab;
 		}
@@ -1121,11 +1121,17 @@ free_map_tab:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD map_extra
+static bool bpf_net_capable(void)
+{
+	return capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) || capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+}
+
+#define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD map_token_fd
 /* called via syscall */
 static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	const struct bpf_map_ops *ops;
+	struct bpf_token *token = NULL;
 	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	u32 map_type = attr->map_type;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
@@ -1176,14 +1182,32 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	if (!ops->map_mem_usage)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (attr->map_token_fd) {
+		token = bpf_token_get_from_fd(attr->map_token_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(token))
+			return PTR_ERR(token);
+
+		/* if current token doesn't grant map creation permissions,
+		 * then we can't use this token, so ignore it and rely on
+		 * system-wide capabilities checks
+		 */
+		if (!bpf_token_allow_cmd(token, BPF_MAP_CREATE) ||
+		    !bpf_token_allow_map_type(token, attr->map_type)) {
+			bpf_token_put(token);
+			token = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	err = -EPERM;
+
 	/* Intent here is for unprivileged_bpf_disabled to block BPF map
 	 * creation for unprivileged users; other actions depend
 	 * on fd availability and access to bpffs, so are dependent on
 	 * object creation success. Even with unprivileged BPF disabled,
 	 * capability checks are still carried out.
 	 */
-	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_capable())
-		return -EPERM;
+	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_BPF))
+		goto put_token;
 
 	/* check privileged map type permissions */
 	switch (map_type) {
@@ -1216,25 +1240,27 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP:
-		if (!bpf_capable())
-			return -EPERM;
+		if (!bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_BPF))
+			goto put_token;
 		break;
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP_HASH:
 	case BPF_MAP_TYPE_XSKMAP:
-		if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
-			return -EPERM;
+		if (!bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+			goto put_token;
 		break;
 	default:
 		WARN(1, "unsupported map type %d", map_type);
-		return -EPERM;
+		goto put_token;
 	}
 
 	map = ops->map_alloc(attr);
-	if (IS_ERR(map))
-		return PTR_ERR(map);
+	if (IS_ERR(map)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(map);
+		goto put_token;
+	}
 	map->ops = ops;
 	map->map_type = map_type;
 
@@ -1271,7 +1297,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		map->btf = btf;
 
 		if (attr->btf_value_type_id) {
-			err = map_check_btf(map, btf, attr->btf_key_type_id,
+			err = map_check_btf(map, token, btf, attr->btf_key_type_id,
 					    attr->btf_value_type_id);
 			if (err)
 				goto free_map;
@@ -1283,15 +1309,16 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
 			attr->btf_vmlinux_value_type_id;
 	}
 
-	err = security_bpf_map_alloc(map);
+	err = security_bpf_map_create(map, attr, token);
 	if (err)
-		goto free_map;
+		goto free_map_sec;
 
 	err = bpf_map_alloc_id(map);
 	if (err)
 		goto free_map_sec;
 
 	bpf_map_save_memcg(map);
+	bpf_token_put(token);
 
 	err = bpf_map_new_fd(map, f_flags);
 	if (err < 0) {
@@ -1312,6 +1339,8 @@ free_map_sec:
 free_map:
 	btf_put(map->btf);
 	map->ops->map_free(map);
+put_token:
+	bpf_token_put(token);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -2133,7 +2162,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	kvfree(aux->func_info);
 	kfree(aux->func_info_aux);
 	free_uid(aux->user);
-	security_bpf_prog_free(aux);
+	security_bpf_prog_free(aux->prog);
 	bpf_prog_free(aux->prog);
 }
 
@@ -2579,13 +2608,15 @@ static bool is_perfmon_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
 }
 
 /* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */
-#define	BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD log_true_size
+#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD prog_token_fd
 
 static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 {
 	enum bpf_prog_type type = attr->prog_type;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog, *dst_prog = NULL;
 	struct btf *attach_btf = NULL;
+	struct bpf_token *token = NULL;
+	bool bpf_cap;
 	int err;
 	char license[128];
 
@@ -2602,10 +2633,31 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 				 BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	bpf_prog_load_fixup_attach_type(attr);
+
+	if (attr->prog_token_fd) {
+		token = bpf_token_get_from_fd(attr->prog_token_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(token))
+			return PTR_ERR(token);
+		/* if current token doesn't grant prog loading permissions,
+		 * then we can't use this token, so ignore it and rely on
+		 * system-wide capabilities checks
+		 */
+		if (!bpf_token_allow_cmd(token, BPF_PROG_LOAD) ||
+		    !bpf_token_allow_prog_type(token, attr->prog_type,
+					       attr->expected_attach_type)) {
+			bpf_token_put(token);
+			token = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	bpf_cap = bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_BPF);
+	err = -EPERM;
+
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
 	    (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT) &&
-	    !bpf_capable())
-		return -EPERM;
+	    !bpf_cap)
+		goto put_token;
 
 	/* Intent here is for unprivileged_bpf_disabled to block BPF program
 	 * creation for unprivileged users; other actions depend
@@ -2614,21 +2666,23 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 	 * capability checks are still carried out for these
 	 * and other operations.
 	 */
-	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_capable())
-		return -EPERM;
+	if (sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled && !bpf_cap)
+		goto put_token;
 
 	if (attr->insn_cnt == 0 ||
-	    attr->insn_cnt > (bpf_capable() ? BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS : BPF_MAXINSNS))
-		return -E2BIG;
+	    attr->insn_cnt > (bpf_cap ? BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS : BPF_MAXINSNS)) {
+		err = -E2BIG;
+		goto put_token;
+	}
 	if (type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER &&
 	    type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB &&
-	    !bpf_capable())
-		return -EPERM;
+	    !bpf_cap)
+		goto put_token;
 
-	if (is_net_admin_prog_type(type) && !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
-		return -EPERM;
-	if (is_perfmon_prog_type(type) && !perfmon_capable())
-		return -EPERM;
+	if (is_net_admin_prog_type(type) && !bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+		goto put_token;
+	if (is_perfmon_prog_type(type) && !bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_PERFMON))
+		goto put_token;
 
 	/* attach_prog_fd/attach_btf_obj_fd can specify fd of either bpf_prog
 	 * or btf, we need to check which one it is
@@ -2638,27 +2692,33 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 		if (IS_ERR(dst_prog)) {
 			dst_prog = NULL;
 			attach_btf = btf_get_by_fd(attr->attach_btf_obj_fd);
-			if (IS_ERR(attach_btf))
-				return -EINVAL;
+			if (IS_ERR(attach_btf)) {
+				err = -EINVAL;
+				goto put_token;
+			}
 			if (!btf_is_kernel(attach_btf)) {
 				/* attaching through specifying bpf_prog's BTF
 				 * objects directly might be supported eventually
 				 */
 				btf_put(attach_btf);
-				return -ENOTSUPP;
+				err = -ENOTSUPP;
+				goto put_token;
 			}
 		}
 	} else if (attr->attach_btf_id) {
 		/* fall back to vmlinux BTF, if BTF type ID is specified */
 		attach_btf = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
-		if (IS_ERR(attach_btf))
-			return PTR_ERR(attach_btf);
-		if (!attach_btf)
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (IS_ERR(attach_btf)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(attach_btf);
+			goto put_token;
+		}
+		if (!attach_btf) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto put_token;
+		}
 		btf_get(attach_btf);
 	}
 
-	bpf_prog_load_fixup_attach_type(attr);
 	if (bpf_prog_load_check_attach(type, attr->expected_attach_type,
 				       attach_btf, attr->attach_btf_id,
 				       dst_prog)) {
@@ -2666,7 +2726,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 			bpf_prog_put(dst_prog);
 		if (attach_btf)
 			btf_put(attach_btf);
-		return -EINVAL;
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto put_token;
 	}
 
 	/* plain bpf_prog allocation */
@@ -2676,7 +2737,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 			bpf_prog_put(dst_prog);
 		if (attach_btf)
 			btf_put(attach_btf);
-		return -ENOMEM;
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto put_token;
 	}
 
 	prog->expected_attach_type = attr->expected_attach_type;
@@ -2687,9 +2749,9 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 	prog->aux->sleepable = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
 	prog->aux->xdp_has_frags = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS;
 
-	err = security_bpf_prog_alloc(prog->aux);
-	if (err)
-		goto free_prog;
+	/* move token into prog->aux, reuse taken refcnt */
+	prog->aux->token = token;
+	token = NULL;
 
 	prog->aux->user = get_current_user();
 	prog->len = attr->insn_cnt;
@@ -2698,12 +2760,12 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 	if (copy_from_bpfptr(prog->insns,
 			     make_bpfptr(attr->insns, uattr.is_kernel),
 			     bpf_prog_insn_size(prog)) != 0)
-		goto free_prog_sec;
+		goto free_prog;
 	/* copy eBPF program license from user space */
 	if (strncpy_from_bpfptr(license,
 				make_bpfptr(attr->license, uattr.is_kernel),
 				sizeof(license) - 1) < 0)
-		goto free_prog_sec;
+		goto free_prog;
 	license[sizeof(license) - 1] = 0;
 
 	/* eBPF programs must be GPL compatible to use GPL-ed functions */
@@ -2717,25 +2779,29 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 	if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux)) {
 		err = bpf_prog_dev_bound_init(prog, attr);
 		if (err)
-			goto free_prog_sec;
+			goto free_prog;
 	}
 
 	if (type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT && dst_prog &&
 	    bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(dst_prog->aux)) {
 		err = bpf_prog_dev_bound_inherit(prog, dst_prog);
 		if (err)
-			goto free_prog_sec;
+			goto free_prog;
 	}
 
 	/* find program type: socket_filter vs tracing_filter */
 	err = find_prog_type(type, prog);
 	if (err < 0)
-		goto free_prog_sec;
+		goto free_prog;
 
 	prog->aux->load_time = ktime_get_boottime_ns();
 	err = bpf_obj_name_cpy(prog->aux->name, attr->prog_name,
 			       sizeof(attr->prog_name));
 	if (err < 0)
+		goto free_prog;
+
+	err = security_bpf_prog_load(prog, attr, token);
+	if (err)
 		goto free_prog_sec;
 
 	/* run eBPF verifier */
@@ -2781,13 +2847,16 @@ free_used_maps:
 	 */
 	__bpf_prog_put_noref(prog, prog->aux->real_func_cnt);
 	return err;
+
 free_prog_sec:
-	free_uid(prog->aux->user);
-	security_bpf_prog_free(prog->aux);
+	security_bpf_prog_free(prog);
 free_prog:
+	free_uid(prog->aux->user);
 	if (prog->aux->attach_btf)
 		btf_put(prog->aux->attach_btf);
 	bpf_prog_free(prog);
+put_token:
+	bpf_token_put(token);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -3777,7 +3846,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_attach_check_attach_type(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
 		return attach_type == prog->expected_attach_type ? 0 : -EINVAL;
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB:
-		if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+		if (!bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 			/* cg-skb progs can be loaded by unpriv user.
 			 * check permissions at attach time.
 			 */
@@ -3980,7 +4049,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_detach(const union bpf_attr *attr)
 static int bpf_prog_query(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
-	if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+	if (!bpf_net_capable())
 		return -EPERM;
 	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_QUERY))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -4748,15 +4817,31 @@ static int bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(const union bpf_attr *attr,
 	return err;
 }
 
-#define BPF_BTF_LOAD_LAST_FIELD btf_log_true_size
+#define BPF_BTF_LOAD_LAST_FIELD btf_token_fd
 
 static int bpf_btf_load(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, __u32 uattr_size)
 {
+	struct bpf_token *token = NULL;
+
 	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_BTF_LOAD))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!bpf_capable())
+	if (attr->btf_token_fd) {
+		token = bpf_token_get_from_fd(attr->btf_token_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(token))
+			return PTR_ERR(token);
+		if (!bpf_token_allow_cmd(token, BPF_BTF_LOAD)) {
+			bpf_token_put(token);
+			token = NULL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!bpf_token_capable(token, CAP_BPF)) {
+		bpf_token_put(token);
 		return -EPERM;
+	}
+
+	bpf_token_put(token);
 
 	return btf_new_fd(attr, uattr, uattr_size);
 }
@@ -5372,6 +5457,20 @@ out_prog_put:
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#define BPF_TOKEN_CREATE_LAST_FIELD token_create.bpffs_fd
+
+static int token_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
+{
+	if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_TOKEN_CREATE))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* no flags are supported yet */
+	if (attr->token_create.flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return bpf_token_create(attr);
+}
+
 static int __sys_bpf(int cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
 {
 	union bpf_attr attr;
@@ -5505,6 +5604,9 @@ static int __sys_bpf(int cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size)
 	case BPF_PROG_BIND_MAP:
 		err = bpf_prog_bind_map(&attr);
 		break;
+	case BPF_TOKEN_CREATE:
+		err = token_create(&attr);
+		break;
 	default:
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		break;
@@ -5611,7 +5713,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = {
 const struct bpf_func_proto * __weak
 tracing_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
-	return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
+	return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id, prog);
 }
 
 BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sys_close, u32, fd)
@@ -5661,7 +5763,8 @@ syscall_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	switch (func_id) {
 	case BPF_FUNC_sys_bpf:
-		return !perfmon_capable() ? NULL : &bpf_sys_bpf_proto;
+		return !bpf_token_capable(prog->aux->token, CAP_PERFMON)
+		       ? NULL : &bpf_sys_bpf_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_btf_find_by_name_kind:
 		return &bpf_btf_find_by_name_kind_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_sys_close: