summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/core.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-04-02 11:03:07 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-04-02 11:03:07 -0700
commitc2bcb4cf021121d7c162e44b7773281891e3abc2 (patch)
tree8f37f13ff2292f0435cd523507d40b7a384cb8c6 /kernel/bpf/core.c
parentbd78980be1a68d14524c51c4b4170782fada622b (diff)
parent89d69c5d0fbcabd8656459bc8b1a476d6f1efee4 (diff)
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2021-04-01 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. We've added 68 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain a total of 70 files changed, 2944 insertions(+), 1139 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) UDP support for sockmap, from Cong. 2) Verifier merge conflict resolution fix, from Daniel. 3) xsk selftests enhancements, from Maciej. 4) Unstable helpers aka kernel func calling, from Martin. 5) Batches ops for LPM map, from Pedro. 6) Fix race in bpf_get_local_storage, from Yonghong. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/core.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/core.c47
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 75244ecb2389f..f5423251c118c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -143,25 +143,25 @@ int bpf_prog_alloc_jited_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog)
if (!prog->aux->nr_linfo || !prog->jit_requested)
return 0;
- prog->aux->jited_linfo = kcalloc(prog->aux->nr_linfo,
- sizeof(*prog->aux->jited_linfo),
- GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ prog->aux->jited_linfo = kvcalloc(prog->aux->nr_linfo,
+ sizeof(*prog->aux->jited_linfo),
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!prog->aux->jited_linfo)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
-void bpf_prog_free_jited_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+void bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
- kfree(prog->aux->jited_linfo);
- prog->aux->jited_linfo = NULL;
-}
+ if (prog->aux->jited_linfo &&
+ (!prog->jited || !prog->aux->jited_linfo[0])) {
+ kvfree(prog->aux->jited_linfo);
+ prog->aux->jited_linfo = NULL;
+ }
-void bpf_prog_free_unused_jited_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- if (prog->aux->jited_linfo && !prog->aux->jited_linfo[0])
- bpf_prog_free_jited_linfo(prog);
+ kfree(prog->aux->kfunc_tab);
+ prog->aux->kfunc_tab = NULL;
}
/* The jit engine is responsible to provide an array
@@ -217,12 +217,6 @@ void bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog,
insn_to_jit_off[linfo[i].insn_off - insn_start - 1];
}
-void bpf_prog_free_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- bpf_prog_free_jited_linfo(prog);
- kvfree(prog->aux->linfo);
-}
-
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size,
gfp_t gfp_extra_flags)
{
@@ -1849,9 +1843,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
/* In case of BPF to BPF calls, verifier did all the prep
* work with regards to JITing, etc.
*/
+ bool jit_needed = false;
+
if (fp->bpf_func)
goto finalize;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) ||
+ bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(fp))
+ jit_needed = true;
+
bpf_prog_select_func(fp);
/* eBPF JITs can rewrite the program in case constant
@@ -1866,14 +1866,10 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
return fp;
fp = bpf_int_jit_compile(fp);
- if (!fp->jited) {
- bpf_prog_free_jited_linfo(fp);
-#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
+ bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(fp);
+ if (!fp->jited && jit_needed) {
*err = -ENOTSUPP;
return fp;
-#endif
- } else {
- bpf_prog_free_unused_jited_linfo(fp);
}
} else {
*err = bpf_prog_offload_compile(fp);
@@ -2354,6 +2350,11 @@ bool __weak bpf_jit_needs_zext(void)
return false;
}
+bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_kfunc_call(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
/* To execute LD_ABS/LD_IND instructions __bpf_prog_run() may call
* skb_copy_bits(), so provide a weak definition of it for NET-less config.
*/