Merge branch 'for-6.15/amd_sfh' into for-linus

From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>

Some platforms include a human presence detection (HPD) sensor. When
enabled and a user is detected a wake event will be emitted from the
sensor fusion hub that software can react to.

Example use cases are "wake from suspend on approach" or to "lock
when leaving".

This is currently enabled by default on supported systems, but users
can't control it. This essentially means that wake on approach is
enabled which is a really surprising behavior to users that don't
expect it.

Instead of defaulting to enabled add a sysfs knob that users can
use to enable the feature if desirable and set it to disabled by
default.

1 files changed, 26 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 2f0acef8908e5..506cd411f4ac2 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -205,18 +205,10 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos,
 	/*
 	 * Avoid relying on expanding the stack down in GUP (which
 	 * does not work for STACK_GROWSUP anyway), and just do it
-	 * by hand ahead of time.
+	 * ahead of time.
 	 */
-	if (write && pos < vma->vm_start) {
-		mmap_write_lock(mm);
-		ret = expand_downwards(vma, pos);
-		if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
-			mmap_write_unlock(mm);
-			return NULL;
-		}
-		mmap_write_downgrade(mm);
-	} else
-		mmap_read_lock(mm);
+	if (!mmap_read_lock_maybe_expand(mm, vma, pos, write))
+		return NULL;
 
 	/*
 	 * We are doing an exec().  'current' is the process
@@ -892,7 +884,8 @@ static struct file *do_open_execat(int fd, struct filename *name, int flags)
 		.lookup_flags = LOOKUP_FOLLOW,
 	};
 
-	if ((flags & ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH)) != 0)
+	if ((flags &
+	     ~(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_EXECVE_CHECK)) != 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	if (flags & AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)
 		open_exec_flags.lookup_flags &= ~LOOKUP_FOLLOW;
@@ -912,7 +905,7 @@ static struct file *do_open_execat(int fd, struct filename *name, int flags)
 	    path_noexec(&file->f_path))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
 
-	err = deny_write_access(file);
+	err = exe_file_deny_write_access(file);
 	if (err)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
@@ -927,7 +920,7 @@ static struct file *do_open_execat(int fd, struct filename *name, int flags)
  * Returns ERR_PTR on failure or allocated struct file on success.
  *
  * As this is a wrapper for the internal do_open_execat(), callers
- * must call allow_write_access() before fput() on release. Also see
+ * must call exe_file_allow_write_access() before fput() on release. Also see
  * do_close_execat().
  */
 struct file *open_exec(const char *name)
@@ -1492,7 +1485,7 @@ static void do_close_execat(struct file *file)
 {
 	if (!file)
 		return;
-	allow_write_access(file);
+	exe_file_allow_write_access(file);
 	fput(file);
 }
 
@@ -1564,6 +1557,21 @@ static struct linux_binprm *alloc_bprm(int fd, struct filename *filename, int fl
 	}
 	bprm->interp = bprm->filename;
 
+	/*
+	 * At this point, security_file_open() has already been called (with
+	 * __FMODE_EXEC) and access control checks for AT_EXECVE_CHECK will
+	 * stop just after the security_bprm_creds_for_exec() call in
+	 * bprm_execve().  Indeed, the kernel should not try to parse the
+	 * content of the file with exec_binprm() nor change the calling
+	 * thread, which means that the following security functions will not
+	 * be called:
+	 * - security_bprm_check()
+	 * - security_bprm_creds_from_file()
+	 * - security_bprm_committing_creds()
+	 * - security_bprm_committed_creds()
+	 */
+	bprm->is_check = !!(flags & AT_EXECVE_CHECK);
+
 	retval = bprm_mm_init(bprm);
 	if (!retval)
 		return bprm;
@@ -1806,7 +1814,7 @@ static int exec_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 		bprm->file = bprm->interpreter;
 		bprm->interpreter = NULL;
 
-		allow_write_access(exec);
+		exe_file_allow_write_access(exec);
 		if (unlikely(bprm->have_execfd)) {
 			if (bprm->executable) {
 				fput(exec);
@@ -1845,7 +1853,7 @@ static int bprm_execve(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 
 	/* Set the unchanging part of bprm->cred */
 	retval = security_bprm_creds_for_exec(bprm);
-	if (retval)
+	if (retval || bprm->is_check)
 		goto out;
 
 	retval = exec_binprm(bprm);
@@ -2151,7 +2159,7 @@ static int proc_dointvec_minmax_coredump(const struct ctl_table *table, int writ
 	return error;
 }
 
-static struct ctl_table fs_exec_sysctls[] = {
+static const struct ctl_table fs_exec_sysctls[] = {
 	{
 		.procname	= "suid_dumpable",
 		.data		= &suid_dumpable,