diff options
author | Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com> | 2025-05-21 01:07:17 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2025-06-19 15:40:52 +0200 |
commit | ef8fc007c28a30a4c0d90bf755e0f343d99bb392 (patch) | |
tree | 364033d645eed4f7ab2867957f188246ad244129 | |
parent | 1b6543cbf5e10a35ee3c17952ed1f066829964a6 (diff) |
ptp: remove ptp->n_vclocks check logic in ptp_vclock_in_use()
[ Upstream commit 87f7ce260a3c838b49e1dc1ceedf1006795157a2 ]
There is no disagreement that we should check both ptp->is_virtual_clock
and ptp->n_vclocks to check if the ptp virtual clock is in use.
However, when we acquire ptp->n_vclocks_mux to read ptp->n_vclocks in
ptp_vclock_in_use(), we observe a recursive lock in the call trace
starting from n_vclocks_store().
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.15.0-rc6 #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz.0.1540/13807 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888035a24868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, at:
ptp_vclock_in_use drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h:103 [inline]
ffff888035a24868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, at:
ptp_clock_unregister+0x21/0x250 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c:415
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888030704868 (&ptp->n_vclocks_mux){+.+.}-{4:4}, at:
n_vclocks_store+0xf1/0x6d0 drivers/ptp/ptp_sysfs.c:215
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux);
lock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux);
*** DEADLOCK ***
....
============================================
The best way to solve this is to remove the logic that checks
ptp->n_vclocks in ptp_vclock_in_use().
The reason why this is appropriate is that any path that uses
ptp->n_vclocks must unconditionally check if ptp->n_vclocks is greater
than 0 before unregistering vclocks, and all functions are already
written this way. And in the function that uses ptp->n_vclocks, we
already get ptp->n_vclocks_mux before unregistering vclocks.
Therefore, we need to remove the redundant check for ptp->n_vclocks in
ptp_vclock_in_use() to prevent recursive locking.
Fixes: 73f37068d540 ("ptp: support ptp physical/virtual clocks conversion")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250520160717.7350-1-aha310510@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h | 12 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h b/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h index 18934e28469e..528d86a33f37 100644 --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_private.h @@ -98,17 +98,7 @@ static inline int queue_cnt(const struct timestamp_event_queue *q) /* Check if ptp virtual clock is in use */ static inline bool ptp_vclock_in_use(struct ptp_clock *ptp) { - bool in_use = false; - - if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux)) - return true; - - if (!ptp->is_virtual_clock && ptp->n_vclocks) - in_use = true; - - mutex_unlock(&ptp->n_vclocks_mux); - - return in_use; + return !ptp->is_virtual_clock; } /* Check if ptp clock shall be free running */ |