diff options
author | Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org> | 2025-09-27 11:40:44 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2025-09-29 18:23:36 -0700 |
commit | c912f935a5c7e43f2b6be94d76e4ddbb6ff14c6d (patch) | |
tree | 2fe6af3b1cadc7420824a6e136e2bc54132ef190 | |
parent | 59701b1870032c1bf32244d87476bcd4b5ecb41b (diff) |
selftests: mptcp: join: validate new laminar endp
Here are a few sub-tests for mptcp_join.sh, validating the new 'laminar'
endpoint type.
In a setup where subflows created using the routing rules would be
rejected by the listener, and where the latter announces one IP address,
some cases are verified:
- Without any 'laminar' endpoints: no new subflows are created.
- With one 'laminar' endpoint: a second subflow is created.
- With multiple 'laminar' endpoints: 2 IPv4 subflows are created.
- With one 'laminar' endpoint, but the server announcing a second IP
address, only one subflow is created.
- With one 'laminar' + 'subflow' endpoint, the same endpoint is only
used once.
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250927-net-next-mptcp-rcv-path-imp-v1-8-5da266aa9c1a@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-rwxr-xr-x | tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 69 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/pm_nl_ctl.c | 9 |
2 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh index a94b3960ad5e..c90d8e8b95cb 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh @@ -2320,6 +2320,74 @@ signal_address_tests() fi } +laminar_endp_tests() +{ + # no laminar endpoints: routing rules are used + if reset_with_tcp_filter "without a laminar endpoint" ns1 10.0.2.2 REJECT && + mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "mptcp_pm_get_endp_laminar_max$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 + join_syn_tx=1 \ + chk_join_nr 0 0 0 + chk_add_nr 1 1 + fi + + # laminar endpoints: this endpoint is used + if reset_with_tcp_filter "with a laminar endpoint" ns1 10.0.2.2 REJECT && + mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "mptcp_pm_get_endp_laminar_max$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 flags laminar + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 + chk_join_nr 1 1 1 + chk_add_nr 1 1 + fi + + # laminar endpoints: these endpoints are used + if reset_with_tcp_filter "with multiple laminar endpoints" ns1 10.0.2.2 REJECT && + mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "mptcp_pm_get_endp_laminar_max$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 flags signal + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 dead:beef:3::2 flags laminar + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 flags laminar + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.4.2 flags laminar + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 + chk_join_nr 2 2 2 + chk_add_nr 2 2 + fi + + # laminar endpoints: only one endpoint is used + if reset_with_tcp_filter "single laminar endpoint" ns1 10.0.2.2 REJECT && + mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "mptcp_pm_get_endp_laminar_max$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 2 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 flags signal + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 flags laminar + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 + chk_join_nr 1 1 1 + chk_add_nr 2 2 + fi + + # laminar endpoints: subflow and laminar flags + if reset_with_tcp_filter "sublow + laminar endpoints" ns1 10.0.2.2 REJECT && + mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "mptcp_pm_get_endp_laminar_max$"; then + pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 4 + pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 2 4 + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.1.2 flags subflow,laminar + pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 flags subflow,laminar + run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 + chk_join_nr 1 1 1 + chk_add_nr 1 1 + fi +} + link_failure_tests() { # accept and use add_addr with additional subflows and link loss @@ -4109,6 +4177,7 @@ all_tests_sorted=( f@subflows_tests e@subflows_error_tests s@signal_address_tests + L@laminar_endp_tests l@link_failure_tests t@add_addr_timeout_tests r@remove_tests diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/pm_nl_ctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/pm_nl_ctl.c index d4981b76693b..65b374232ff5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/pm_nl_ctl.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/pm_nl_ctl.c @@ -830,6 +830,8 @@ int add_addr(int fd, int pm_family, int argc, char *argv[]) flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW; else if (!strcmp(tok, "signal")) flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SIGNAL; + else if (!strcmp(tok, "laminar")) + flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_LAMINAR; else if (!strcmp(tok, "backup")) flags |= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_BACKUP; else if (!strcmp(tok, "fullmesh")) @@ -1018,6 +1020,13 @@ static void print_addr(struct rtattr *attrs, int len) printf(","); } + if (flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_LAMINAR) { + printf("laminar"); + flags &= ~MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_LAMINAR; + if (flags) + printf(","); + } + if (flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_BACKUP) { printf("backup"); flags &= ~MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_BACKUP; |