summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2025-08-12 14:57:06 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2025-08-20 18:30:16 +0200
commitbf2809541497749c4f2646b87bf75244f5a2a5d9 (patch)
tree59a7b79a27b1c5b103dd1749a1c95a46084d01a5
parent8cc2020d910f960b5f6708b590d14365fd19c724 (diff)
ACPI: processor: perflib: Move problematic pr->performance check
commit d405ec23df13e6df599f5bd965a55d13420366b8 upstream. Commit d33bd88ac0eb ("ACPI: processor: perflib: Fix initial _PPC limit application") added a pr->performance check that prevents the frequency QoS request from being added when the given processor has no performance object. Unfortunately, this causes a WARN() in freq_qos_remove_request() to trigger on an attempt to take the given CPU offline later because the frequency QoS object has not been added for it due to the missing performance object. Address this by moving the pr->performance check before calling acpi_processor_get_platform_limit() so it only prevents a limit from being set for the CPU if the performance object is not present. This way, the frequency QoS request is added as it was before the above commit and it is present all the time along with the CPU's cpufreq policy regardless of whether or not the CPU is online. Fixes: d33bd88ac0eb ("ACPI: processor: perflib: Fix initial _PPC limit application") Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2801421.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index af342f0e03b3..d81f30ce2341 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ void acpi_processor_ppc_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
int ret;
- if (!pr || !pr->performance)
+ if (!pr)
continue;
/*
@@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ void acpi_processor_ppc_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n",
cpu, ret);
+ if (!pr->performance)
+ continue;
+
ret = acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(pr);
if (ret)
pr_err("Failed to update freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n",