summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2025-09-15 20:28:52 +0200
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2025-09-16 19:51:37 +0200
commitbaf60d5cb8bc6b85511c5df5f0ad7620bb66d23c (patch)
tree10bbe0d4991feddbc32078f8b3a7c991a4173369
parent737c3a09dcf69ba2814f3674947ccaec1861c985 (diff)
ACPI: property: Do not pass NULL handles to acpi_attach_data()
In certain circumstances, the ACPI handle of a data-only node may be NULL, in which case it does not make sense to attempt to attach that node to an ACPI namespace object, so update the code to avoid attempts to do so. This prevents confusing and unuseful error messages from being printed. Also document the fact that the ACPI handle of a data-only node may be NULL and when that happens in a code comment. In addition, make acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() print a diagnostic message for each data-only node with an unknown ACPI namespace scope. Fixes: 1d52f10917a7 ("ACPI: property: Tie data nodes to acpi handles") Cc: 6.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.0+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/property.c12
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c
index f4776a4085e0..c086786fe84c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/property.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c
@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(union acpi_object *desc,
result = true;
if (result) {
+ /*
+ * This will be NULL if the desc package is embedded in an outer
+ * _DSD-equivalent package and its scope cannot be determined.
+ */
dn->handle = handle;
dn->data.pointer = desc;
list_add_tail(&dn->sibling, list);
@@ -224,6 +228,8 @@ static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope,
* strings because there is no way to build full
* pathnames out of them.
*/
+ acpi_handle_debug(scope, "subnode %s: Unknown scope\n",
+ link->package.elements[0].string.pointer);
desc = &link->package.elements[1];
result = acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(desc, NULL, link,
list, parent);
@@ -396,6 +402,9 @@ static void acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data)
struct acpi_data_node *dn;
list_for_each_entry(dn, &data->subnodes, sibling) {
+ if (!dn->handle)
+ continue;
+
acpi_detach_data(dn->handle, acpi_nondev_subnode_tag);
acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(&dn->data);
@@ -410,6 +419,9 @@ static bool acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data)
acpi_status status;
bool ret;
+ if (!dn->handle)
+ continue;
+
status = acpi_attach_data(dn->handle, acpi_nondev_subnode_tag, dn);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_ALREADY_EXISTS) {
acpi_handle_err(dn->handle, "Can't tag data node\n");