diff options
| author | Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> | 2025-07-25 10:15:50 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2025-08-20 18:30:52 +0200 |
| commit | a2bbe1fcd3519bd31f223bf798174bee9423b85f (patch) | |
| tree | 26c338c5d673237696a22432efb83640cf5affc1 | |
| parent | c0d7c9827239ba5bca987ba54c72edac10e6b568 (diff) | |
ext4: initialize superblock fields in the kballoc-test.c kunit tests
commit 82e6381e23f1ea7a14f418215068aaa2ca046c84 upstream.
Various changes in the "ext4: better scalability for ext4 block
allocation" patch series have resulted in kunit test failures, most
notably in the test_new_blocks_simple and the test_mb_mark_used tests.
The root cause of these failures is that various in-memory ext4 data
structures were not getting initialized, and while previous versions
of the functions exercised by the unit tests didn't use these
structure members, this was arguably a test bug.
Since one of the patches in the block allocation scalability patches
is a fix which is has a cc:stable tag, this commit also has a
cc:stable tag.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250714130327.1830534-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250725021550.3177573-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250725021654.3188798-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/b0635ad0-7ebf-4152-a69b-58e7e87d5085@roeck-us.net/
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c index bb2a223b207c..f13db95284d9 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ static struct super_block *mbt_ext4_alloc_super_block(void) bgl_lock_init(sbi->s_blockgroup_lock); sbi->s_es = &fsb->es; + sbi->s_sb = sb; sb->s_fs_info = sbi; up_write(&sb->s_umount); @@ -801,6 +802,10 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0); grp->bb_free = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb); + grp->bb_largest_free_order = -1; + grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = -1; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node); mbt_generate_test_ranges(sb, ranges, TEST_RANGE_COUNT); for (i = 0; i < TEST_RANGE_COUNT; i++) test_mb_mark_used_range(test, &e4b, ranges[i].start, @@ -873,6 +878,10 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test) ext4_unlock_group(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP); grp->bb_free = 0; + grp->bb_largest_free_order = -1; + grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_order = -1; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_largest_free_order_node); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&grp->bb_avg_fragment_size_node); memset(bitmap, 0xff, sb->s_blocksize); mbt_generate_test_ranges(sb, ranges, TEST_RANGE_COUNT); |