diff options
| author | Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> | 2025-03-28 10:06:23 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> | 2025-03-31 14:12:14 +0300 |
| commit | 9900e35a3ab14e1dcd5987b7ea13150e9ba2dc02 (patch) | |
| tree | d2ea2e0442cb331a4ad314170ed7e8136d2abe7f | |
| parent | 94f608992f8cabe9cc2e318d81b2beac87802cba (diff) | |
drm/i915/psr: Add PSR pause/resume reference count
We have now seen this:
<4> [2120.434153] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] drm_WARN_ON(psr->paused)
<4> [2120.434196] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4430 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c:2227 intel_psr_pause+0x16e/0x180 [i915]
Comment for drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, psr->paused) in intel_psr_pause says:
"If we ever hit this, we will need to add refcount to pause/resume"
This patch is implementing PSR pause/resume refcount.
v3: Incorporate changes missing from v2
v2: Add drm_warn for detecting possible unbalanced pause/resume
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250328080623.1183669-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 31 |
2 files changed, 18 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h index 7d9cc430a6b8..367b53a9eae2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h @@ -1620,7 +1620,7 @@ struct intel_psr { bool sink_support; bool source_support; bool enabled; - bool paused; + int pause_counter; enum pipe pipe; enum transcoder transcoder; bool active; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c index c4be3f46511f..55414fa55b12 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c @@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, intel_psr_enable_source(intel_dp, crtc_state); intel_dp->psr.enabled = true; - intel_dp->psr.paused = false; + intel_dp->psr.pause_counter = 0; /* * Link_ok is sticky and set here on PSR enable. We can assume link @@ -2199,7 +2199,6 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, */ void intel_psr_pause(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { - struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp); struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr; if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp) && !CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp)) @@ -2212,12 +2211,10 @@ void intel_psr_pause(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return; } - /* If we ever hit this, we will need to add refcount to pause/resume */ - drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, psr->paused); - - intel_psr_exit(intel_dp); - intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(intel_dp); - psr->paused = true; + if (intel_dp->psr.pause_counter++ == 0) { + intel_psr_exit(intel_dp); + intel_psr_wait_exit_locked(intel_dp); + } mutex_unlock(&psr->lock); @@ -2233,6 +2230,7 @@ void intel_psr_pause(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) */ void intel_psr_resume(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) { + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp); struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr; if (!CAN_PSR(intel_dp) && !CAN_PANEL_REPLAY(intel_dp)) @@ -2240,13 +2238,18 @@ void intel_psr_resume(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) mutex_lock(&psr->lock); - if (!psr->paused) - goto unlock; + if (!psr->enabled) + goto out; - psr->paused = false; - intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); + if (!psr->pause_counter) { + drm_warn(display->drm, "Unbalanced PSR pause/resume!\n"); + goto out; + } -unlock: + if (--intel_dp->psr.pause_counter == 0) + intel_psr_activate(intel_dp); + +out: mutex_unlock(&psr->lock); } @@ -3298,7 +3301,7 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct intel_display *display, * we have to ensure that the PSR is not activated until * intel_psr_resume() is called. */ - if (intel_dp->psr.paused) + if (intel_dp->psr.pause_counter) goto unlock; if (origin == ORIGIN_FLIP || |