diff options
| author | Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> | 2021-01-15 08:32:39 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2021-03-04 12:15:11 +0100 |
| commit | 6ffd6b38d9d1151ea4d5cf52e2952be4dab0882f (patch) | |
| tree | 56193e88bcdcd8e1e756c8b00db35efe330a8735 | |
| parent | c9a2ed3fdd037314a71e6a6ba5d99a3605f6f9c7 (diff) | |
pwm: iqs620a: Fix overflow and optimize calculations
[ Upstream commit 72d6b2459dbd539c1369149e501fdc3dc8ddef16 ]
If state->duty_cycle is 0x100000000000000, the previous calculation of
duty_scale overflows and yields a duty cycle ratio of 0% instead of
100%. Fix this by clamping the requested duty cycle to the maximal
possible duty cycle first. This way it is possible to use a native
integer division instead of a (depending on the architecture) more
expensive 64bit division.
With this change in place duty_scale cannot be bigger than 256 which
allows to simplify the calculation of duty_val.
Fixes: 6f0841a8197b ("pwm: Add support for Azoteq IQS620A PWM generator")
Tested-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c index 5ede8255926e..14b18fb4f527 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-iqs620a.c @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static int iqs620_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, { struct iqs620_pwm_private *iqs620_pwm; struct iqs62x_core *iqs62x; - u64 duty_scale; + unsigned int duty_cycle; + unsigned int duty_scale; int ret; if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL) @@ -70,7 +71,8 @@ static int iqs620_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, * For lower duty cycles (e.g. 0), the PWM output is simply disabled to * allow an external pull-down resistor to hold the GPIO3/LTX pin low. */ - duty_scale = div_u64(state->duty_cycle * 256, IQS620_PWM_PERIOD_NS); + duty_cycle = min_t(u64, state->duty_cycle, IQS620_PWM_PERIOD_NS); + duty_scale = duty_cycle * 256 / IQS620_PWM_PERIOD_NS; mutex_lock(&iqs620_pwm->lock); @@ -82,7 +84,7 @@ static int iqs620_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, } if (duty_scale) { - u8 duty_val = min_t(u64, duty_scale - 1, 0xff); + u8 duty_val = duty_scale - 1; ret = regmap_write(iqs62x->regmap, IQS620_PWM_DUTY_CYCLE, duty_val); |