diff options
author | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2024-01-26 22:31:42 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-02-23 08:41:54 +0100 |
commit | 443b16ee3d9ce0a3ece0e3526a5af883e5b16eaf (patch) | |
tree | 20a8ef6cbe45918d1c5d98bf3ac5de6d1ff07ac9 | |
parent | bfc0647791d7a8f3e178a896a26c4ef7794876b7 (diff) |
stddef: Introduce DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() helper
commit 3080ea5553cc909b000d1f1d964a9041962f2c5b upstream.
There are many places where kernel code wants to have several different
typed trailing flexible arrays. This would normally be done with multiple
flexible arrays in a union, but since GCC and Clang don't (on the surface)
allow this, there have been many open-coded workarounds, usually involving
neighboring 0-element arrays at the end of a structure. For example,
instead of something like this:
struct thing {
...
union {
struct type1 foo[];
struct type2 bar[];
};
};
code works around the compiler with:
struct thing {
...
struct type1 foo[0];
struct type2 bar[];
};
Another case is when a flexible array is wanted as the single member
within a struct (which itself is usually in a union). For example, this
would be worked around as:
union many {
...
struct {
struct type3 baz[0];
};
};
These kinds of work-arounds cause problems with size checks against such
zero-element arrays (for example when building with -Warray-bounds and
-Wzero-length-bounds, and with the coming FORTIFY_SOURCE improvements),
so they must all be converted to "real" flexible arrays, avoiding warnings
like this:
fs/hpfs/anode.c: In function 'hpfs_add_sector_to_btree':
fs/hpfs/anode.c:209:27: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'struct bplus_internal_node[0]' [-Wzero-length-bounds]
209 | anode->btree.u.internal[0].down = cpu_to_le32(a);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
In file included from fs/hpfs/hpfs_fn.h:26,
from fs/hpfs/anode.c:10:
fs/hpfs/hpfs.h:412:32: note: while referencing 'internal'
412 | struct bplus_internal_node internal[0]; /* (internal) 2-word entries giving
| ^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c: In function 'es58x_fd_tx_can_msg':
drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:360:35: warning: array subscript 65535 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds]
360 | tx_can_msg = (typeof(tx_can_msg))&es58x_fd_urb_cmd->raw_msg[msg_len];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_core.h:22,
from drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.c:17:
drivers/net/can/usb/etas_es58x/es58x_fd.h:231:6: note: while referencing 'raw_msg'
231 | u8 raw_msg[0];
| ^~~~~~~
However, it _is_ entirely possible to have one or more flexible arrays
in a struct or union: it just has to be in another struct. And since it
cannot be alone in a struct, such a struct must have at least 1 other
named member -- but that member can be zero sized. Wrap all this nonsense
into the new DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() in support of having flexible arrays
in unions (or alone in a struct).
As with struct_group(), since this is needed in UAPI headers as well,
implement the core there, with a non-UAPI wrapper.
Additionally update kernel-doc to understand its existence.
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/137
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kovalev <kovalev@altlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/stddef.h | 13 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/uapi/linux/stddef.h | 16 | ||||
-rwxr-xr-x | scripts/kernel-doc | 3 |
3 files changed, 31 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h index 938216f8ab7e7..31fdbb784c24e 100644 --- a/include/linux/stddef.h +++ b/include/linux/stddef.h @@ -84,4 +84,17 @@ enum { #define struct_group_tagged(TAG, NAME, MEMBERS...) \ __struct_group(TAG, NAME, /* no attrs */, MEMBERS) +/** + * DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() - Declare a flexible array usable in a union + * + * @TYPE: The type of each flexible array element + * @NAME: The name of the flexible array member + * + * In order to have a flexible array member in a union or alone in a + * struct, it needs to be wrapped in an anonymous struct with at least 1 + * named member, but that member can be empty. + */ +#define DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) \ + __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) + #endif diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h b/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h index c3725b4922632..7837ba4fe7289 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/stddef.h @@ -28,4 +28,20 @@ struct { MEMBERS } ATTRS; \ struct TAG { MEMBERS } ATTRS NAME; \ } + +/** + * __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() - Declare a flexible array usable in a union + * + * @TYPE: The type of each flexible array element + * @NAME: The name of the flexible array member + * + * In order to have a flexible array member in a union or alone in a + * struct, it needs to be wrapped in an anonymous struct with at least 1 + * named member, but that member can be empty. + */ +#define __DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(TYPE, NAME) \ + struct { \ + struct { } __empty_ ## NAME; \ + TYPE NAME[]; \ + } #endif diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc index 19af6dd160e6b..7a04d4c053260 100755 --- a/scripts/kernel-doc +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc @@ -1232,7 +1232,8 @@ sub dump_struct($$) { $members =~ s/DECLARE_KFIFO\s*\(([^,)]+),\s*([^,)]+),\s*([^,)]+)\)/$2 \*$1/gos; # replace DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR $members =~ s/DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR\s*\(([^,)]+),\s*([^,)]+)\)/$2 \*$1/gos; - + # replace DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY + $members =~ s/(?:__)?DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY\s*\($args,\s*$args\)/$1 $2\[\]/gos; my $declaration = $members; # Split nested struct/union elements as newer ones |