diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2025-08-29 11:22:15 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2025-09-09 15:07:58 -0700 |
commit | 387be23a95b14705a804900c3a0db5a12bf19636 (patch) | |
tree | caab466f0bbe843f9bc2316599f442948d868d91 | |
parent | 3aa9b9a165d5e9afc7d8b5dbcd508810c05c8e89 (diff) | |
parent | 5d40c038c879eeb910039adeaf6102e1c4dda807 (diff) |
Merge branch 'selftests-bpf-fix-expression-result-unused-warnings-with-icecc'
Ilya Leoshkevich says:
====================
selftests/bpf: Fix "expression result unused" warnings with icecc
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250827194929.416969-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v3 -> v4: Go back to the original solution (Yonghong, Alexei).
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250827130519.411700-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v2 -> v3: Do not touch libbpf, explain how having two function
declarations works (Andrii).
Fix bpf-gcc build (CI).
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250508113804.304665-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
v1 -> v2: Annotate bpf_obj_new_impl() with __must_check (Alexei).
Add an explanation about icecc.
I took another look at the "expression result unused" warnings I've
been seeing, and it turned out that the root cause was the icecc
compiler wrapper and what I consider a clang bug. Back then I've
reported that the problem was reproducible with plain clang, but now
I see that it was clearly a mixup, sorry about that.
The solution is to add a few awkward (void) casts. I've added a
detailed explanation of why they are helpful to the commit message.
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250829030017.102615-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_fail.c | 5 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h index d67466c1ff77..f90531cf3ee5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_arena_spin_lock.h @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int arena_spin_lock_slowpath(arena_spinlock_t __arena __arg_arena *lock, u32 val * barriers. */ if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK) - smp_cond_load_acquire_label(&lock->locked, !VAL, release_err); + (void)smp_cond_load_acquire_label(&lock->locked, !VAL, release_err); /* * take ownership and clear the pending bit. @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ queue: /* Link @node into the waitqueue. */ WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node); - arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended_label(&node->locked, release_node_err); + (void)arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended_label(&node->locked, release_node_err); /* * While waiting for the MCS lock, the next pointer may have diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_fail.c index 6438982b928b..ddd26d1a083f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_fail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list_fail.c @@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ int obj_new_no_composite(void *ctx) SEC("?tc") int obj_new_no_struct(void *ctx) { - - bpf_obj_new(union { int data; unsigned udata; }); + (void)bpf_obj_new(union { int data; unsigned udata; }); return 0; } @@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ int new_null_ret(void *ctx) SEC("?tc") int obj_new_acq(void *ctx) { - bpf_obj_new(struct foo); + (void)bpf_obj_new(struct foo); return 0; } |