diff options
author | Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org> | 2022-05-17 11:04:20 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2022-08-25 11:38:24 +0200 |
commit | 3527e3cbb84d8868c4d4e91ba55915f96d39ec3d (patch) | |
tree | 622b07c9c57cc0b5d0e7f9df77c78c68b238742a | |
parent | 4f7286422a7836459f79445fbbdacff53da3b58b (diff) |
bpf: Fix KASAN use-after-free Read in compute_effective_progs
commit 4c46091ee985ae84c60c5e95055d779fcd291d87 upstream.
Syzbot found a Use After Free bug in compute_effective_progs().
The reproducer creates a number of BPF links, and causes a fault
injected alloc to fail, while calling bpf_link_detach on them.
Link detach triggers the link to be freed by bpf_link_free(),
which calls __cgroup_bpf_detach() and update_effective_progs().
If the memory allocation in this function fails, the function restores
the pointer to the bpf_cgroup_link on the cgroup list, but the memory
gets freed just after it returns. After this, every subsequent call to
update_effective_progs() causes this already deallocated pointer to be
dereferenced in prog_list_length(), and triggers KASAN UAF error.
To fix this issue don't preserve the pointer to the prog or link in the
list, but remove it and replace it with a dummy prog without shrinking
the table. The subsequent call to __cgroup_bpf_detach() or
__cgroup_bpf_detach() will correct it.
Fixes: af6eea57437a ("bpf: Implement bpf_link-based cgroup BPF program attachment")
Reported-by: <syzbot+f264bffdfbd5614f3bb2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=8ebf179a95c2a2670f7cf1ba62429ec044369db4
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220517180420.87954-1-tadeusz.struk@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 70 |
1 files changed, 60 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c index 6aa9e10c6335..d154e52dd7ae 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c @@ -654,6 +654,60 @@ static struct bpf_prog_list *find_detach_entry(struct list_head *progs, } /** + * purge_effective_progs() - After compute_effective_progs fails to alloc new + * cgrp->bpf.inactive table we can recover by + * recomputing the array in place. + * + * @cgrp: The cgroup which descendants to travers + * @prog: A program to detach or NULL + * @link: A link to detach or NULL + * @type: Type of detach operation + */ +static void purge_effective_progs(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog, + struct bpf_cgroup_link *link, + enum bpf_attach_type type) +{ + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; + struct bpf_prog_array *progs; + struct bpf_prog_list *pl; + struct list_head *head; + struct cgroup *cg; + int pos; + + /* recompute effective prog array in place */ + css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &cgrp->self) { + struct cgroup *desc = container_of(css, struct cgroup, self); + + if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&desc->bpf.refcnt)) + continue; + + /* find position of link or prog in effective progs array */ + for (pos = 0, cg = desc; cg; cg = cgroup_parent(cg)) { + if (pos && !(cg->bpf.flags[type] & BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI)) + continue; + + head = &cg->bpf.progs[type]; + list_for_each_entry(pl, head, node) { + if (!prog_list_prog(pl)) + continue; + if (pl->prog == prog && pl->link == link) + goto found; + pos++; + } + } +found: + BUG_ON(!cg); + progs = rcu_dereference_protected( + desc->bpf.effective[type], + lockdep_is_held(&cgroup_mutex)); + + /* Remove the program from the array */ + WARN_ONCE(bpf_prog_array_delete_safe_at(progs, pos), + "Failed to purge a prog from array at index %d", pos); + } +} + +/** * __cgroup_bpf_detach() - Detach the program or link from a cgroup, and * propagate the change to descendants * @cgrp: The cgroup which descendants to traverse @@ -671,7 +725,6 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 flags = cgrp->bpf.flags[type]; struct bpf_prog_list *pl; struct bpf_prog *old_prog; - int err; if (prog && link) /* only one of prog or link can be specified */ @@ -686,9 +739,12 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog, pl->prog = NULL; pl->link = NULL; - err = update_effective_progs(cgrp, type); - if (err) - goto cleanup; + if (update_effective_progs(cgrp, type)) { + /* if update effective array failed replace the prog with a dummy prog*/ + pl->prog = old_prog; + pl->link = link; + purge_effective_progs(cgrp, old_prog, link, type); + } /* now can actually delete it from this cgroup list */ list_del(&pl->node); @@ -700,12 +756,6 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_prog_put(old_prog); static_branch_dec(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key); return 0; - -cleanup: - /* restore back prog or link */ - pl->prog = old_prog; - pl->link = link; - return err; } /* Must be called with cgroup_mutex held to avoid races. */ |